« Supreme Court Update | Main | Meet Dr. Norman Spack, the nutjob who wants to give sex changes to kids! »

Liberals DO hate the troops, and we can prove it

When they're out in public and in front of a microphone, liberals like to talk a big game when it comes to supporting the United States Military. Unfortunately for them, they tend to forget about keeping the facade going all the time, and their true colors come out rather often -- usually followed by fake apologies with declarations of endless respect and admiration for the troops!

It's just too bad that there's this little thing called the Internet, which makes the libtards' military-hating colors impossible to hide.

John Hawkins at Right Wing News got the best of the worst quotes in the battle of libtards vs. the military, and here's a few of the choicest ones:

"Through every Abu aib and Haditha, through every rape and murder, the American public has indulged those in uniform....We pay the soldiers a decent wage, take care of their families, provide them with housing and medical care and vast social support systems and ship obscene amenities into the war zone for them, we support them in every possible way, and their attitude is that we should in addition roll over and play dead, defer to the military and the generals and let them fight their war, and give up our rights and responsibilities to speak up because they are above society?... [T]he recent NBC report is just an ugly reminder of the price we pay for a mercenary - oops sorry, volunteer - force that thinks it is doing the dirty work." -- Washington Post blogger, William Arkin

"American fighters of the Pacific War were not heroes. The desperation of island combat included exchanged barbarities of which no one would willingly speak for a generation. On the American side, there were foul racism, vengeful refusals to take prisoners, a generalized brutality that extended to a savage air war." -- James Carroll in the Boston Globe
"For those of you who do, as a matter of principle, oppose war in any form, the idea of supporting a conscientious objector who's already been inducted [and] in his combat service in Iraq might have a certain appeal. But let me ask you this: Would you render the same support to someone who hadn't conscientiously objected, but rather instead rolled a grenade under their line officer in order to neutralize the combat capacity of their unit?"

Later, in a question-and-answer period, Churchill was asked whether the trauma "fragging" inflicts on that officer's family back home should be considered, he responded: "How do you feel about Adolf Eichmann's family?" - From Ward Churchill via WorldNetDaily

"Real freedom will come when [U.S.] soldiers in Iraq turn their guns on their superiors." -- Warren County Community College adjunct English professor, John Daly
"Democrat flaks jump on this like ducks on a June-bug, and in the process themselves reproduce the sick militarism of this culture that automatically valorizes anyone who wears a uniform. How dare you insult a soldier! Like its some sacred calling instead of an imperial employment program steeped in the culture of machismo and misogyny.(And you can gasp as theatrically as you want... I spent more than two decades wearing a uniform... that is exactly what it is.)" -- Stan Goff at the Huffington Post
"The Iraqis who have risen up against the occupation are not 'insurgents' or 'terrorists' or 'The Enemy.' They are the REVOLUTION, the Minutemen, and their numbers will grow -- and they will win." -- Michael Moore
"Over time, however, the endless war in Iraq began to play a role in natural selection. Only idiots signed up; only idiots died. Back home, the average I.Q. soared." -- Ted Rall
"You don't have money to fund the war or children, but you're going to spend it to blow up innocent people if we could get enough kids to grow old enough for you to send to Iraq to get their heads blown off for the president's amusement." -- Democratic Congressman Pete Stark

The sad thing is, this is just the tip of the iceberg. There are tons more for you to read -- make sure to check out the whole sorry bunch. Every time you hear some liberal bragging about how much they love our troops, remember this.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/29771.

Comments (31)

"Liberals DO hate the troop... (Below threshold)
jp2:

"Liberals DO hate the troops, and we can prove it"


Yeah, except Pat Tillman...

This is absolute trash, Cassy.

"Yeah, except Pat Tillman..... (Below threshold)
cirby:

"Yeah, except Pat Tillman... This is absolute trash"

They HATED pat Tillman until he died. Then he was their new cause celebre.

REALLY bad example, there.

Cassy,I sometimes ... (Below threshold)
bond:

Cassy,

I sometimes wonder if their are limits to your stupidity. So far, we haven't reached them. Why are conservatives blocking a new GI bill for the troops?

Gosh, by your sick standards it must be because they hate the troops.


Rather poor attempt at non ... (Below threshold)
SPQR:

Rather poor attempt at non sequitur, bond. Quite lame in fact.

JP and Bond - do you... (Below threshold)
macofromoc:


JP and Bond - do you stand by the quotes that were mentioned in Cassy's post? You never commented on that.

I don't know if you can cla... (Below threshold)
Scrapiron:

I don't know if you can classify envy of what the troops do, and hate for yourself because you don't have the balls to do what the troops do, as hate for the troops. It is hate of a sorts, like BDS, it will eventually eat them up inside and millions will resort to suicide as the only out. Good on them.

"Liberals DO hate the troop... (Below threshold)
bryanD:

"Liberals DO hate the troops, and we can prove it"-cassy

_"Chickenhawk Droppings"_

!starring Peanut & Kern!

-a Dwayne D. Bathtub production-


Nice job Cassy.I s... (Below threshold)
ODA315:

Nice job Cassy.

I see you're trolling for asshats again.....

Looks like a good catch.

Rather poor attempt at n... (Below threshold)
Brian:

Rather poor attempt at non sequitur, bond. Quite lame in fact.

Except... it wasn't a non sequitur. In a post accusing liberals of hating the troops based on their quotes, asking why conservatives hate the troops based on their actions is entirely on topic. Or should he have had a quote from someone blocking the GI bill instead?

Nice try, but once again you're all snark, no substance.

Let me say first of all I c... (Below threshold)
ArmyReserveWife:

Let me say first of all I consider myself a conservative.

I have to say at least the above quotes are said out loud. Our ever loving Republican's just say one thing then lie and go back and cut funding, cut troop strength, or geez maybe go in without overwhelming force so we don't have to occupy a foreign country for YEARS and send home our men and women in body bags and either physically or mentally not at 100%. Which one is worse? Democrat or Republican? I personally can't tell anymore.

So, Bond, have you actually... (Below threshold)
Ryan:

So, Bond, have you actually READ the GI bill?

Just because it says it gives money to the troops, does that mean its worth passing right off? DO you know if, perhaps, it has unacceptable add - ons in it? Just because you don't want to add a bunch of pork or, perhaps, realize there are limits to entitlements when we already have trouble paying for the entitlements we have _right now_ doesn't make you non - supportive. For some reason liberals have this disease. THey think that the only way of being supportive of something is with other people's money.

Rightwinger hate Blacks! I ... (Below threshold)

Rightwinger hate Blacks! I can prove it by listing a bunch of racist quotes by conservatives!

Americans hate Jews! I can prove it by listing a bunch of ant-Semitic quotes by Americans!

And so on.

Jackass.

As a liberal, I have to say... (Below threshold)
WildWillie:

As a liberal, I have to say Cassy is correct, we hate the troops. Always have, always will. (disclaimer:I am not a liberal, I have an intellect and ability to know right from wrong which hinders me from becoming a liberal) ww

When you cannot distinguish... (Below threshold)
Weegie:

When you cannot distinguish "liberal" rhetoric and radical Islamic propaganda, one has to question whether they really support the troops or not.

Calling the troops murderers and comparing them to Nazis isn't what I consider "support". Calling the commander of our forces in Iraq a liar isn't what I consider "support". At least, it isn't support for OUR side.

Words and actions have meaning and consequence, "liberals".

You dopey liberals should f... (Below threshold)
moseby:

You dopey liberals should feel real proud of that list of comments in Cassy's post. Real proud. I am suprised your hero keeth oberdouche wasn't included.

"Why are conservatives bloc... (Below threshold)
Rick13:

"Why are conservatives blocking a new GI bill for the troops"

Because it has a time line for a withdrawal of all troops built into it. That is the reason they are "blocking" it. I am here in Iraq right now. I can tell you honestly, that a vast majority of the troops here do not want a withdrawal until we have completed our mission.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/05/06/house.war.funding/

I only wish the liberals an... (Below threshold)
irongrampa:

I only wish the liberals and dems in this world would take their undying "support" for our military and SHOVE it until they CHOKE on it.

Conservatives hate thinking... (Below threshold)
bond:

Conservatives hate thinking and I can prove it.

Look at all they have written on this board. (particularly Cassy and any comment by the wild moron)The best part is when their logical fallicies are pointed out to them it doesn\'t even register.
depp=true
notiz=Broad brushing will get you every time, horrifying!

Leftists clearly do support... (Below threshold)
P. Bunyan:

Leftists clearly do support the troops. They supported the North Vietnamese troops in the 60's and 70's and today they support Al Qaeda and Iran's proxy troops in Iraq. Hell Obama has pledged to lead them to certain victory in Iraq if he's elected.

See? Leftists can honestly make the clain that they support the troops. It's not a matter of them not supporting the troops, it's just a matter of which troops they support.

No irony that this post was... (Below threshold)
JFO:

No irony that this post was filed under the label asshat. That aptly describes the author of the post and the likes of the resident commie fighter et al. Vacuous minds one and all.

Rick13 touched on exactly t... (Below threshold)
Oyster:

Rick13 touched on exactly the question I was going to ask. What is attached to this bill that some have found too distasteful to vote for?

Stop and read the bill before you go spouting off on that same old tired rhetoric, that Republicans hate the troops/children/elderly/poor because they didn't vote for [insert bill here].

Okay?

Democrats have a terrible habit of attaching all manner of horrid legislation to issues of great importance, issues that both sides readily agree on, and then they go spouting off to the media that Republicans won't vote for [insert only the good part here].

There are far too many bills and measures that could quickly and easily pass on their own merits. But when someone has a pet project that they know won't pass, or their intent is just to make the other guy look bad (like during a heated election season) they simply attach it to a bill that evokes great emotion among Americans and then tell only half truths.

We all should have learned this lesson years ago. In fact, for any new comers to politics we have had a hefty plateful of it for the first four years of Bush's presidency.

A small example includes, but is not limited to:

"Republicans cut funding for housing!" When they actually raised it, but not as much as the Democrats wanted.

"Republicans cut funding for education!"

Wash, rinse, repeat.

"No irony that this post... (Below threshold)
Oyster:

"No irony that this post was filed under the label asshat."

The irony is that you showed up.

OysterYou're like ... (Below threshold)
JFO:

Oyster

You're like a fart in the wind. Stinky, but you fade quickly.

OysterSince you mu... (Below threshold)
JFO:

Oyster

Since you must obviously have read the Bill why don't you enlighten us with your specific objections. Otherwise, why do you not support out troops?

With all due respect to Rick 13, the Bill he was referring to was the Iraq funding Bill, not the GI Bill. The link he posted was to the funding authorization. I see no such provision in the GI Bill.

Your hypocrisy is showing, ... (Below threshold)
minnie:

Your hypocrisy is showing, wizbang. If your going to remove one max post, why not remove them all? For that matter, why not remove all posts that you don't like? Then the echo chamber will be complete.

JFO, I have not read the bi... (Below threshold)
Oyster:

JFO, I have not read the bill. Therefore, I do not have specific objections. Which then begs the question: Why would you come to the conclusion that unless I've read it and have specific objections, I do not support the troops? I'm having a bit of trouble seeing how your logic flows there.

If you'll re-read my comment, I asked what part of the bill was so unsavory. You did read that part, right?

JFO - "With all due res... (Below threshold)
marc:

JFO - "With all due respect to Rick 13, the Bill he was referring to was the Iraq funding Bill, not the GI Bill. The link he posted was to the funding authorization. I see no such provision in the GI Bill."

Ok, then how about this as a good reason to not support the bill.

The bill as written would give the new bene's to those that serve only three years (the Pentagon what 6 years min) in the service. That has the serious potential to undermine troop strength because most enlistments are for 4 or more years.

A six year minimum isn't too much to ask when the cost foe each service member would be approx $120,000 for a four year degree.

Additionally is the added cost of retraining troops to replace those that may opt out of re-enlisting if they get out after 2-3 years of service.

BTW JFO are you going to whine about the House version of the bill that passed with Republican support? It included a .47 increase in taxes for the WEALTHY, you know the ones you lefttoids all think the R's bend over backwards to pander to.

And P.S. apparently you didn't read the new G.I. Bill purposal either it includes a major expansion of state unemployment benefits.

NITWIT

OysterOf course yo... (Below threshold)
JFO:

Oyster

Of course you not reading the bill has nothing whatsoever to do with whether or not you support the troops. It's as fallacious an argument as when some asshats on the left make ignorant and stupid comments about the troops, and silly generalizations are made about liberals from asshats such as the author of the post. I was being sarcastic. I know nothing more about whether and how you support troops than anyone here knows about me.

MarcI'll try to re... (Below threshold)
JFO:

Marc

I'll try to respond to you with no pejoratives, which with you is not easy.

You have legitimate points about the bill. It isn't in final form yet and most likely there will be compromises before it becomes final.

I'm not whining about anything. Of course this will be a bill supported by both sides when it reaches its final form If for no other reason then people from both sided will do it to save their own political asses. (I have no more respect for Congress - Democrat or Republican -than anyone else).

There is a view which I think has some validity that the administration is luke warm about the bill because they are afraid people won't re-enlist in order to leave and use the expanded benefits. It that's true it's incredibly pathetic.

JFO - "It that's true i... (Below threshold)
marc:

JFO - "It that's true it's incredibly pathetic."

Pathetic to be concerned about troop retention, moral and strength?

That's the Pentagon's job nitwit.

That's what I said? Gee.</p... (Below threshold)
JFO:

That's what I said? Gee.




Advertisements









rightads.gif

beltwaybloggers.gif

insiderslogo.jpg

mba_blue.gif

Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile

Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links

Credits

Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login



Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy