No, this is not a joke.
Australia's Australia Broadcasting Corporation (which is taxpayer funded) released the Greenhouse Calculator for kids. The very first thing you see upon entering the site is a sign saying:
Prof. Schpinkee's Greenhouse Calculator
Tacked to the sign is a note that says:
Find out when you should die!
Kids are then asked:
How big a greenhouse pig are you?Click the question numbers across the top and select your answer for each one (the Australian average answer is indicated).
With each answer, see how your CO2 production compares to the Average Aussie greenhouse pig, and to an environmentally sustainable "green" pig.
When you're done, click on [skull and crossbones] to find out what age you should die at so you don't use more than your fair share of Earth's resources!
The test asks you questions about how often you drive a car, how fuel efficient your car is, how much energy you use in your home, how big your home is, how often you eat meat, etc. If you spent over $100,000 your pig grows to be gigantic and grotesquely disgusting, unsurprisingly.
I did the test. Right before it calculates your you-should-have-died-for-Gaia age, your pig explodes. Blood and pig guts fly all over the place, and then it gives you your you-should-have-died-for-Gaia age. Apparently, I was supposed to die at 7.5 years old.
The site accomplishes two tasks at once: instilling antihuman environmentalist propaganda, while at the same time establishing that authorities are in a position to determine how long you should live.
Which means it's the perfect liberal tool! I love the "fair share" meme too. We all have a pre-determined amount of resources we're allowed to use, and government authorities are the perfect people to let us know what that amount is.
Pretty sickening stuff, huh? I wonder how long it'll be before the Goracle, the UN, PETA, and all the other enviro-weenies are demanding that we have similar death calculators for kids here in the U.S., and for the kiddies in Europe.
Anyone still want to deny that global warming is an evil cult?
... Anyone?
Hat Tip: Moonbattery
Comments (74)
My life span was projected ... (Below threshold)1. Posted by moseby | May 28, 2008 11:30 AM | Score: 7 (7 votes cast)
My life span was projected at 2.3 years...and loving it!!!
1. Posted by moseby | May 28, 2008 11:30 AM |
Score: 7 (7 votes cast)
Posted on May 28, 2008 11:30
2. Posted by Donnie | May 28, 2008 11:36 AM | Score: -18 (20 votes cast)
I guess the elephant-in-the-room has to stick its trunk further up your neverparts. Iceberg Scott McClellan must be cold distress.
The fall of Bush republicanism has a certain grandeur remaniscent of the fall of the Soviet Union or the sinking of the Titanic.
2. Posted by Donnie | May 28, 2008 11:36 AM |
Score: -18 (20 votes cast)
Posted on May 28, 2008 11:36
3. Posted by Donnie | May 28, 2008 11:42 AM | Score: -15 (15 votes cast)
btw, Whatever happened to funny fave commenters like Jo or Kim...
And, yes, I meant netherparts above.
3. Posted by Donnie | May 28, 2008 11:42 AM |
Score: -15 (15 votes cast)
Posted on May 28, 2008 11:42
4. Posted by Why is his comment left here? | May 28, 2008 11:49 AM | Score: 9 (9 votes cast)
Well, I for one would like to hear more off-topic BDS rants. Tell us more, Donnie!
4. Posted by Why is his comment left here? | May 28, 2008 11:49 AM |
Score: 9 (9 votes cast)
Posted on May 28, 2008 11:49
5. Posted by P. Bunyan | May 28, 2008 11:54 AM | Score: 10 (10 votes cast)
First I did the test with my actual answers and it said I should have died at 5.2 years old.
Then I started playing with it to see how they weighted things. It appears that it's more about the typical Marxist ideals than "environmental" concerns. Then again, Marxism and leftist "environmentalism" are one in the same so that wasn't really surprising.
Well actually they are not exactly one in the same, but rather the leftists use pseudo-environmentalism as a means to achieve their ultimate goal of Marxist socialism. I guess if you believe in leftist ideals it's o.k. to lie to people and play on their fears.
5. Posted by P. Bunyan | May 28, 2008 11:54 AM |
Score: 10 (10 votes cast)
Posted on May 28, 2008 11:54
6. Posted by Donnie | May 28, 2008 12:14 PM | Score: -16 (16 votes cast)
OK, w.i.t.c.l.h.
Scott McClellan's admissions contain nuggets that are...Criminal. Crimes committed against the Constitution and the People it purports to represent.
6. Posted by Donnie | May 28, 2008 12:14 PM |
Score: -16 (16 votes cast)
Posted on May 28, 2008 12:14
7. Posted by Clay | May 28, 2008 12:18 PM | Score: 12 (12 votes cast)
The fall of Bush republicanism has a certain grandeur remaniscent(sic) of the fall of the Soviet Union or the sinking of the Titanic.
Scott McClellan's admissions contain nuggets that are...Criminal.
Just more datapoints in my theory that lefties have a predilection for Attention Deficit. Or Tourette Syndrome.
Now, back to the topic: The basic premise behind all altruistic doctrines is that my injury is required in order to ensure the welfare of the collective. Not only is my suffering acceptable, it is necessary. And the level of my suffering for the good of the collective is found on a sliding scale that leads me to my ultimate sacrifice.
Yep. Sounds like a cult to me.
7. Posted by Clay | May 28, 2008 12:18 PM |
Score: 12 (12 votes cast)
Posted on May 28, 2008 12:18
8. Posted by Donnie | May 28, 2008 12:31 PM | Score: -16 (16 votes cast)
Clay-
Some more "datapoints for your eledictionz" Filled my tank today...Nearly seventy bucks...asshole.
8. Posted by Donnie | May 28, 2008 12:31 PM |
Score: -16 (16 votes cast)
Posted on May 28, 2008 12:31
9. Posted by min | May 28, 2008 12:36 PM | Score: -15 (17 votes cast)
That is truly f**ked up. But, by all means, use this obscure piece of crap from the other side of the world to "broad-brush" all "liberals" everywhere. A liberal being defined as anyone having differing political views from you.
9. Posted by min | May 28, 2008 12:36 PM |
Score: -15 (17 votes cast)
Posted on May 28, 2008 12:36
10. Posted by Scrapiron | May 28, 2008 12:36 PM | Score: 5 (7 votes cast)
The 'kill all the green pigs' idea won't work in the U.S. First to die would be Algorabge and all of the Holy-wood wonks along with their offspring. Actually everyone in Holy-wood and the surrounding area would have to die within 12 hours. The members of the U.S. congress would be next in line.
Funny what ideas about life come out of the mental facilities around the world. This idea is a prime example and millions of democrats will jump on the bandwagon, none will jump off the cliff to do their part.
10. Posted by Scrapiron | May 28, 2008 12:36 PM |
Score: 5 (7 votes cast)
Posted on May 28, 2008 12:36
11. Posted by Clay | May 28, 2008 12:37 PM | Score: 7 (9 votes cast)
Filled my tank today...Nearly seventy bucks.
Hey putz. Back on topic. Good job.
You can blame environmentalists like Prof. Schpinkee for the price of gas.
Are you twelve?
11. Posted by Clay | May 28, 2008 12:37 PM |
Score: 7 (9 votes cast)
Posted on May 28, 2008 12:37
12. Posted by Scrapiron | May 28, 2008 12:44 PM | Score: 12 (14 votes cast)
Hey Donnie the dense. I put $80.50 worth of gas in my F-150 4 x 4 yesterday and will do it again next week. Funny thing is that gas has went up 67% since the democrats took control of congress a short 16 months ago. Before the democrats 'leadership' the cost would have been around $35. I just look at it as the cost of electing the appeasers in 06 and it will get worse in 09. The liberals leadership want it all and don't want the average worker (that's you Donnie) to have anything. We used to call it Nazism or Communism, now we call it leadership by democrats. Is that democratism?
12. Posted by Scrapiron | May 28, 2008 12:44 PM |
Score: 12 (14 votes cast)
Posted on May 28, 2008 12:44
13. Posted by Clay | May 28, 2008 12:44 PM | Score: 9 (9 votes cast)
First to die would be Algorabge and all of the Holy-wood wonks along with their offspring.
The concept doesn't apply to them. They're exempt. That's the whole beauty of collectivism. The elite need not change their lifestyles. Cool, huh?
13. Posted by Clay | May 28, 2008 12:44 PM |
Score: 9 (9 votes cast)
Posted on May 28, 2008 12:44
14. Posted by Donnie | May 28, 2008 12:47 PM | Score: -17 (17 votes cast)
The face of seventy dollar fill-ups is poltroonish George WTF Bush. Care to elaborate?
14. Posted by Donnie | May 28, 2008 12:47 PM |
Score: -17 (17 votes cast)
Posted on May 28, 2008 12:47
15. Posted by Clay | May 28, 2008 12:54 PM | Score: 15 (15 votes cast)
Donnie,
Bowing to environmentalist demands since the 1970s, Congress has blocked oil and gas drilling from areas like the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (10.4 billion barrels of oil, according to the U.S. Geological Service) and the Outer Continental Shelf (86 billion barrels of oil, according to the Minerals Management Service).
As Cuba works out deals with Canadian, Spanish and Chinese companies to explore for oil as close as 50 miles to Key West, Sen. Mel Martinez, R-Fla., - apparently trying to appease the League of Conservation Voters which has given him a 10 percent rating - dubbed a proposal by Rep. John Peterson, R-Pa., to allow drilling 20 miles off the Florida coast as "crazy."
Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., and Rep. Connie Mack, R-Fla., also oppose OCS drilling thanks to oil spill hysteria whipped up by the Sierra Club.
You're up.
15. Posted by Clay | May 28, 2008 12:54 PM |
Score: 15 (15 votes cast)
Posted on May 28, 2008 12:54
16. Posted by Donnie | May 28, 2008 1:00 PM | Score: -17 (17 votes cast)
Clay-
The eggs you place in ANWR and Florida are shells. Nearly empty shells. Peak oil ist Peak Oil.
16. Posted by Donnie | May 28, 2008 1:00 PM |
Score: -17 (17 votes cast)
Posted on May 28, 2008 13:00
17. Posted by Clay | May 28, 2008 1:04 PM | Score: 8 (8 votes cast)
Your turn to elaborate. And cite sources, please, as did I.
17. Posted by Clay | May 28, 2008 1:04 PM |
Score: 8 (8 votes cast)
Posted on May 28, 2008 13:04
18. Posted by JLawson | May 28, 2008 1:07 PM | Score: 11 (11 votes cast)
Clay -
How DARE you actually bring stats to something like this! Don't you realize that you're supposed to look at Donnie's handwaving statements, nod sagely and go "You're right! How could I have been so blind!" instead of arguing on a fact-based level?
:-)
18. Posted by JLawson | May 28, 2008 1:07 PM |
Score: 11 (11 votes cast)
Posted on May 28, 2008 13:07
19. Posted by Clay | May 28, 2008 1:10 PM | Score: 7 (7 votes cast)
Just call me wacky that way.
19. Posted by Clay | May 28, 2008 1:10 PM |
Score: 7 (7 votes cast)
Posted on May 28, 2008 13:10
20. Posted by hyperbolist | May 28, 2008 1:22 PM | Score: -14 (14 votes cast)
I needed a car for a weekend so I rented a Prius. Gas isn't expensive if you don't need it. You know what I would've done, Clay, if I were as concerned as you about the lack of exploration/drilling? Adjusted my behaviour. You maybe could have started with asking a European how they have coped with gas prices historically far higher than ours. Personally, I got rid of my car and moved within walking distance of my office. That's not possible for everyone, but people seem far more likely to start demanding solutions to expensive commodities, rather than coping with the price of said commodities.
Blaming an impotent Democratic congress and/or an incompetent Republican administration for the cost of gas and oil is a bit ridiculous.
20. Posted by hyperbolist | May 28, 2008 1:22 PM |
Score: -14 (14 votes cast)
Posted on May 28, 2008 13:22
21. Posted by Clay | May 28, 2008 1:28 PM | Score: 10 (10 votes cast)
Okay. I'm patient. Go get your Ritalin and then read my comment...r-e-a-l slow.
You said that ANWR and the OCS were 'empty shells'. Please elaborate and cite sources. Unless, of course, you're purposefully being evasive.
21. Posted by Clay | May 28, 2008 1:28 PM |
Score: 10 (10 votes cast)
Posted on May 28, 2008 13:28
22. Posted by Clay | May 28, 2008 1:37 PM | Score: 7 (7 votes cast)
You know what I would've done, Clay, if I were as concerned as you about the lack of exploration/drilling?
Can none of you follow conversations? I'm not complaining about the price of gas, Donnie is. I only offered explanations that perhaps he hadn't considered. The price of gas has given me an excuse to make my 4-cyl Scout a daily driver. I'm having a blast. But, you're not projecting, are you? I mean, you don't think that you're the only one smart enough to make adjustments, do you?
22. Posted by Clay | May 28, 2008 1:37 PM |
Score: 7 (7 votes cast)
Posted on May 28, 2008 13:37
23. Posted by Donnie | May 28, 2008 1:39 PM | Score: -9 (9 votes cast)
Clay- real slow-
How much do you pay for a gallon of gas?
Get it?
23. Posted by Donnie | May 28, 2008 1:39 PM |
Score: -9 (9 votes cast)
Posted on May 28, 2008 13:39
24. Posted by kevino | May 28, 2008 1:41 PM | Score: 4 (4 votes cast)
As the Instapundit said, "I'll believe it's a crisis when the people who keep telling me it's a crisis act like it's a crisis."
In that context, if this was truly a cult, then Vice President Al Gore would drink the cool-aid and kill himself immediately. No amount of preaching can ever atone for his wasteful life as a greenhouse pig. Al, please, save the planet!
24. Posted by kevino | May 28, 2008 1:41 PM |
Score: 4 (4 votes cast)
Posted on May 28, 2008 13:41
25. Posted by Clay | May 28, 2008 1:43 PM | Score: 9 (9 votes cast)
Donnie,
You said that ANWR and the OCS were 'empty shells'. Please elaborate and cite sources. Let's start there. If not, then I get your game.
25. Posted by Clay | May 28, 2008 1:43 PM |
Score: 9 (9 votes cast)
Posted on May 28, 2008 13:43
26. Posted by Clay | May 28, 2008 1:49 PM | Score: 6 (6 votes cast)
if this was truly a cult, then Vice President Al Gore would drink the cool-aid
I respectfully disagree. The leaders of cults always place themselves above the masses.
I still say it's a cult.
26. Posted by Clay | May 28, 2008 1:49 PM |
Score: 6 (6 votes cast)
Posted on May 28, 2008 13:49
27. Posted by apb | May 28, 2008 1:51 PM | Score: 6 (6 votes cast)
Feh -
For 30 years Congress has proven its impotence - we WOULD be energy-independent through expansion of drilling locations, refineries, and nuke plants. Problem is, our favorite Congresswhores have sold us all out.
I noticed that the socialist Tool slams all the ills of financial success - no surprise. For the Gaia-worshipping yahoos, let it stand that my death age *should* have been negative - they never gave me the option of selecting my 7.4 liter gas-burner as a mode of transport.
Chevy 3500 - the anti-Prius.
27. Posted by apb | May 28, 2008 1:51 PM |
Score: 6 (6 votes cast)
Posted on May 28, 2008 13:51
28. Posted by Donnie | May 28, 2008 1:57 PM | Score: -13 (13 votes cast)
Clay- Do you really think ANWR is an endless reserve? Do you really think Florida is the answer?
They are the epitome of empty souless shells.
28. Posted by Donnie | May 28, 2008 1:57 PM |
Score: -13 (13 votes cast)
Posted on May 28, 2008 13:57
29. Posted by Donnie | May 28, 2008 2:09 PM | Score: -10 (10 votes cast)
Remember the go-to guestion--How much are you paying for a galllon of gas?
29. Posted by Donnie | May 28, 2008 2:09 PM |
Score: -10 (10 votes cast)
Posted on May 28, 2008 14:09
30. Posted by Lamedusa | May 28, 2008 2:15 PM | Score: 5 (5 votes cast)
Donnie says-
"Some more "datapoints for your eledictionz" Filled my tank today...Nearly seventy bucks...asshole."
What kind of car do you drive? Can't be one of those "eco-friendly" hybrids.
"They are the epitome of empty souless shells."
Talk to your friend min about "broad brushing".
30. Posted by Lamedusa | May 28, 2008 2:15 PM |
Score: 5 (5 votes cast)
Posted on May 28, 2008 14:15
31. Posted by Sheik Yur Bouty | May 28, 2008 2:15 PM | Score: 10 (10 votes cast)
Dummie,
No, no, no.
HOW MUCH is only relevant if you are prepared to ask WHY you are paying that much...and prepared to deal with the answer.
You don't seem to have the, ahhhh, faculties necessary for the WHY.
31. Posted by Sheik Yur Bouty | May 28, 2008 2:15 PM |
Score: 10 (10 votes cast)
Posted on May 28, 2008 14:15
32. Posted by suhnami | May 28, 2008 2:36 PM | Score: 5 (5 votes cast)
Donnie,
You should really supply some stats instead of one liners. Yes, we get gas is expensive, Clay explained why with good stats. He's asked for yours. You've supplied nothing. You are unlikely to win any favor. Not being mean, just trying to be helpful. Also a spel chekker is helpful good grammer use to good.
32. Posted by suhnami | May 28, 2008 2:36 PM |
Score: 5 (5 votes cast)
Posted on May 28, 2008 14:36
33. Posted by Clay | May 28, 2008 2:56 PM | Score: 5 (7 votes cast)
Do you really think ANWR is an endless reserve? Do you really think Florida is the answer?
You don't have stats, do you? Typical leftie. Turns evasive when the talk turns to reality.
33. Posted by Clay | May 28, 2008 2:56 PM |
Score: 5 (7 votes cast)
Posted on May 28, 2008 14:56
34. Posted by Clay | May 28, 2008 3:00 PM | Score: 4 (4 votes cast)
Remember the go-to guestion--How much are you paying for a galllon of gas?
That wasn't the question, and you know it. You are being evasive. You keep saying that ANWR & OCS are 'empty shells', but you refuse to back it up. Produce the stats or shut up.
34. Posted by Clay | May 28, 2008 3:00 PM |
Score: 4 (4 votes cast)
Posted on May 28, 2008 15:00
35. Posted by Master Shake | May 28, 2008 3:28 PM | Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
Awwww, poor Donnie's just mad that Cassie referred to this calculator as "the perfect liberal tool" when Donnie knows that he is the perfect liberal tool!
35. Posted by Master Shake | May 28, 2008 3:28 PM |
Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
Posted on May 28, 2008 15:28
36. Posted by Joel | May 28, 2008 3:41 PM | Score: 6 (6 votes cast)
Stats are here: http://www.eia.doe.gov/neic/infosheets/petroleumproductsconsumption.html
US oil consumption in 2005 was 20.8MM barrels per day, 60% imported. That means we need 12.5MM barrels of additional domestic production to wean us off foreign oil.
Let's see: 96.4 billion barrrels from ANWR and OCS (Clay - 15 above) divided by 12.5MM barrels per day = 21.13 years. Finite shells yes, but hardly empty.
36. Posted by Joel | May 28, 2008 3:41 PM |
Score: 6 (6 votes cast)
Posted on May 28, 2008 15:41
37. Posted by hyperbolist | May 28, 2008 3:48 PM | Score: -11 (11 votes cast)
Worth hundreds of billions in new refineries, Joel? Um, no. Howzabout huge tax breaks for people who buy hybrids? Howzabout massive investment in public transportation? Seriously, subways and streetcars are fun to ride to work (read the paper, play with the 'Pod), but if you need to commute, the Prius was totally sweet, give it a try. It's like driving... in the future.
37. Posted by hyperbolist | May 28, 2008 3:48 PM |
Score: -11 (11 votes cast)
Posted on May 28, 2008 15:48
38. Posted by Clay | May 28, 2008 3:49 PM | Score: 7 (9 votes cast)
The problem is that liberals simply don't think. They make proclamations that are not founded in fact. Donnie says that George Bush is the villain behind the price of gas, yet it can be so easily demonstrated that this problem is 30 years in the making. The source of the problem can be traced back to the environmentalists (who are collectivists) making the claim that we must go back to the stone age or risk extinction. All the while the leaders of this collective make no concessions in their own lives and are perfectly willing for this problem to rest on the shoulders of the masses. I tell you that the collectivists are absolutely gleeful that the price of gas is rising. It forces us to make the concessions they desire. This is the culmination of 30+ years of work. Donnie is just an unwitting instrument. Emphasize the unwitting.
BTW, keep in mind that as the gas prices rise, so does their tax windfall. In the meantime, they march the oil execs into session and portray solidarity with the masses they victimize. Now ask yourselves who the real culprits are.
How're ya doing on those stats, Donnie?
38. Posted by Clay | May 28, 2008 3:49 PM |
Score: 7 (9 votes cast)
Posted on May 28, 2008 15:49