« Gee, Agenda Much? | Main | John McCain, Hero »

Today's lesson in Irony II

Newspapers love leaks, except when it directly involves them.

NEW YORK Owners of the Philadelphia Inquirer and Philadelphia Daily News say someone wrongly leaked information from a private conference call earlier this week that resulted in a Standard & Poor's report on the ownership missing an interest payment.

Jay Devine, a spokesman for Philadelphia Media Holdings, declined to confirm or deny the report that the company missed a June 1 interest payment on $85 million of loans and is in talks with lenders for relief. But he said the report was the result of an improper leak by someone involved in the conference call just days ago.

"The report was the result of someone breaking a confidence of a conference call that was held the other day between the bankers, our company and financial analysts," he told E&P Friday, declining to say what day the call occurred. "We will express our disappointment and try to reiterate the fact that they are confidential discussions and private discussions and ask people to honor that confidence."

Ethically the leaker was probably wrong and Philadelphia Media Holdings is within its right to complain.. Answer me this Mr. Devine, if similar information about a major Philadelphia corporation had been leaked to Philadelphia Media Holdings, would your employer reported on it or not?

  • Currently 4.6/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rating: 4.6/5 (12 votes cast)


Close

Email this entry to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):


AddThis Feed Button

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://wizbangblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/30189

Comments (5)

If it bleeds it leads. ... (Below threshold)

If it bleeds it leads.

Wow, love the indignation t... (Below threshold)
GarandFan[TypeKey Profile Page]:

Wow, love the indignation that someone within a news organization wouldLEAK information to outsiders. Have they, at long last, no shame?

Moreover, if sensitive secu... (Below threshold)
Paul:

Moreover, if sensitive security information was provided to the paper that could result in the loss of American interests, would the paper not print that as well?

Hypocritical, sure, but iro... (Below threshold)

Hypocritical, sure, but irony?

Of course they would leak i... (Below threshold)

Of course they would leak it. The irony is that if the leaker were a newsie, he/she probably expedited their own demise.


Post a comment




Advertisements








rightads.gif

beltwaybloggers.gif

insiderslogo.jpg

mba_blue.gif

Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

tips@wizbangblog.com

Categories

Archives

Credits

Publisher: Kevin Aylward

Section Editor: Jay Tea

Comment Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Jim Addison, Charlie Quidnunc, Jayson Javitz, Cassy Fiano

All original content copyright © 2003-2007 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type 3.35

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login

Site Meter


Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice