Much has been made recently of the meaning of the plot-line behind WALL-E, Pixar's newest animation. Conservatives have been debating whether this movie is an attempt at environmental indoctrination of our kids or a well camouflaged conservative message. World Magazine did an interview with Andrew Stanton, WALL-E's filmmaker, for its June 28th edition and asked about the movie's meaning. The entire interview is worth reading, but this part is particularly interesting:
WORLD: How does WALL•E represent your singular vision?STANTON: Well, what really interested me was the idea of the most human thing in the universe being a machine because it has more interest in finding out what the point of living is than actual people. The greatest commandment Christ gives us is to love, but that's not always our priority. So I came up with this premise that could demonstrate what I was trying to say--that irrational love defeats the world's programming. You've got these two robots that are trying to go above their basest directives, literally their programming, to experience love.
With the human characters I wanted to show that our programming is the routines and habits that distract us to the point that we're not really making connections to the people next to us. We're not engaging in relationships, which are the point of living--relationship with God and relationship with other people.
WORLD: The depiction of humanity is pretty stark in this movie.
STANTON: Well, when I started outlining humanity in the story, I asked myself: What if everything you needed to survive--health care, food--was taken care of and you had nothing but a perpetual vacation to fill your time? What if the result of all that convenience was that all your relationships became indirect--nobody's reaching out to each other? A lot of people have suggested that I was making a comment on obesity. But that wasn't it, I was trying to make humanity big babies because there was no reason for them to grow up anymore.
That's the argument that conservatives have been making against more government control and womb to the tomb governmental care. It will make Americans, independent and resourceful by nature, lazy and unambitious. In my book, that's a good message for American kids - all kids - to learn today.
Megan Basham, the author of the World piece has a side bar in which she offers her take on the movie and she offers this:
And though on the surface WALL-E looks like it's selling the easiest, trendiest message going today - environmentalism - it's too smart for that.True, the foundation for the story is that humanity has left the planet heaped in garbage. But far weightier themes - like how technology distances us from the wonder of creation and how that distance cripples us spiritually - play a bigger role. In fact, if Stanton criticizes people for anything, it's for worship of leisure. Because they live to be cared for rather than to care, the few human beings WALL-E meets have become, to use Stanton's words, giant babies - literally feeding on milk rather than solid food. In contrast, WALL-E, the meek little trash collector, accepts stewardship in a way that people have rejected. And because love springs from service, he comes to love the creatures that inhabit Earth. That's not an environmental message, it's a biblical one.




Comments (9)
Amen. Great Post to follow... (Below threshold)1. Posted by epador | July 4, 2008 10:22 AM | Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
Amen. Great Post to follow the DI.
1. Posted by epador | July 4, 2008 10:22 AM |
Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
Posted on July 4, 2008 10:22
2. Posted by Maggie | July 4, 2008 11:08 AM | Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
I am looking forward to seeing this
movie, and this isn't something I
ordinarily do.
2. Posted by Maggie | July 4, 2008 11:08 AM |
Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
Posted on July 4, 2008 11:08
3. Posted by cirby | July 4, 2008 1:27 PM | Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Wall-E is certainly one of the best films I've seen in a LONG time - so much so that I'm going to go see it again some time this weekend, and it's been years since that happened.
I even bought toys (a little Wall-E and Eve set) to put by my computer. And I'm an old fart.
3. Posted by cirby | July 4, 2008 1:27 PM |
Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on July 4, 2008 13:27
4. Posted by Dodo David | July 4, 2008 8:36 PM | Score: -3 (3 votes cast)
I have seen the movie, and it is a simple love story. I see no reason to analyze it.
4. Posted by Dodo David | July 4, 2008 8:36 PM |
Score: -3 (3 votes cast)
Posted on July 4, 2008 20:36
5. Posted by The Listkeeper | July 4, 2008 10:09 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Pixar making a good movie that has a moral hidden in it? Say it ain't so!
5. Posted by The Listkeeper | July 4, 2008 10:09 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 4, 2008 22:09
6. Posted by bryanD | July 4, 2008 11:33 PM | Score: -5 (5 votes cast)
Grasping on to a film maker because he gives a religious publication the time of day and isn't an avowed satanist so maybe he likes you. Or your kids. Or does he? Update when the message is deciphered.
Which reminds me of the time I first saw Pasolini's "The Gospel According to Saint Matthew" thanks to the socialists at PBS who were probably keen on Pasolini's avowed Marxism. But, hey: best "Jesus movie" ever made, including Mel Gibson's root canal. So it just goes to show: script, camera. The rest is tensil, lines for your mind to connect.
Check it out. Italian neo-realism, non-actors, zero budget, best angel ever, bookends the movie perfectly. *****/*****
http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=the+gospel+according+to+saint+matthew&sitesearch=#
Confession: Re: "messages" and influences: I was dragged to CS Lewis "Christian" borefest (Narnia/Caspian) and found myself having impure thoughts about Georgie Henley the whole time.
6. Posted by bryanD | July 4, 2008 11:33 PM |
Score: -5 (5 votes cast)
Posted on July 4, 2008 23:33
7. Posted by epador | July 4, 2008 11:50 PM | Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
bryanD:
Best go back to your milk so's you don't have another impure tantrum.
7. Posted by epador | July 4, 2008 11:50 PM |
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on July 4, 2008 23:50
8. Posted by Bob | July 17, 2008 11:55 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
"Conservatives have been debating whether this movie is an attempt at environmental indoctrination of our kids or a well camouflaged conservative message."
I figured the movie would be environmental indoctrination, but after watching it I thought it might be the other way.
Didn't someone like Rush Limbaugh (conservative) say that global warming is inevitable whether we pollute or not?
If you squint your eyes, doesn't the movie kind of say that if global warming will eventually fix itself? If we can somehow weather the storm, after like 800 years the planet will be fine... Maybe the movie is indoctrinating people to not worry about the environment... everything will be fine.
8. Posted by Bob | July 17, 2008 11:55 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 17, 2008 11:55
9. Posted by patrick | July 17, 2008 7:11 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Wall-E totally looks like the robot from "Short Circuit"... minus the cheesy 80's style of course
9. Posted by patrick | July 17, 2008 7:11 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 17, 2008 19:11