« "You Keep Using That Word. I Do Not Think It Means What You Think It Means." | Main | Tongue tied »

Rielle Hunter: John Edwards could be the next Gandhi

Or maybe Martin Luther King. Take your pick. Rielle says John was her "project", and she could make him great:

I struck up a conversation with the woman at the next event, as we waited outside. She told me her name and asked me what my astrological sign was, which I thought was a little unusual. I told her. She smiled, and began telling me her life story: how she was working as a documentary-film maker, living with a friend in South Orange, N.J., but how she'd previously had "many lives." She'd worked, she said, as an actress and as a spiritual adviser. She was fiercely devoted to astrology and New Age spirituality. She'd been a New York party girl, she'd been married and divorced, she'd been a seeker and a teacher and was a firm believer in the power of truth.

...

I would soon learn that there was no such thing as small talk with Rielle Hunter. She told me that she'd felt a connection to me when we'd first met, that she could tell I was a very old soul. This meant a lot to Rielle. Her speech was peppered with New Age jargon--human beings were dragged down by "blockages" to their actual potential; history was the story of souls entering and escaping our field of consciousness. A seminal book for her had been Eckhart Tolle's "The Power of Now." Her purpose on this Earth, she said, was to help raise awareness about all this, to help the unenlightened become better reflections of their true, repressed selves.

Her latest project was John Edwards. Edwards, she said, was an old soul who had barely tapped into any of his potential. The real John Edwards, she believed, was a brilliant, generous, giving man who was driven by competing impulses--to feed his ego and serve the world. If he could only tap into his heart more, and use his head less, he had the power to be a "transformational leader" on par with Gandhi and Martin Luther King. "He has the power to change the world," she said.

...

By this point, we were each well into our second glass of wine. "So tell me," I asked, "what do you think of Elizabeth Edwards?" "I've only met her once," Rielle said. "She does not give off good energy. She didn't make eye contact with me."

...

When I next saw Rielle weeks later, she told me that she'd been fired by the Edwards campaign. She seemed perfectly cheerful about it, but she proceeded to tell me a tale of woe--how the campaign hadn't understood her, how they'd ruined the Webisodes, how they'd impeded her vision and how Edwards himself had failed to defend her. The chief villain in this saga was Elizabeth Edwards. "Someday," Rielle said, "the truth about her is going to come out."


Shocker of all shockers, the mistress sees the wife as the villain. That's a new one.

But about the Gandhi/MLK thing. Is it just me, or does Rielle Hunter remind you of Penny Lane from the movie Almost Famous? I mean, check out this quote:

Groupies?! We are not groupies. This is Penny Lane, man, show some respect. Groupies sleep with rock stars 'cause they wanna be near someone famous. We're here because of the music. We are Band Aids. She used to run a school for Band Aids. We don't have intercourse with them. We inspire the music. We're here because of the music. She was the one who changed everything. She was the one who said, "No more sex. No more exploiting our bodies and our hearts." - Right. Just blowjobs, that's it. -

Sounds scarily similar to me. And it's probably because they're cut from the same mold: insecure women who are desperate to feel special and loved by someone important, so they sleep with them and then invent a way to make themselves feel less cheap.

What was also interesting was another project Rielle said she was going to do, where she "helped" men get out of bad marriages by sleeping with them. She called it a "genius" idea. Was John Edwards her first test subject?

Now, Rielle's probably right that John Edwards could be great if he just got out of his head. Someone get the guy a brain transplant, quick, so that he'll have the capability of being a decent human being. I mean, let's run down the list. He exploited families with sick children for financial gain. He manipulated tension between financial classes while living a more lavish lifestyle than most rockstars do. He used donations from supporters to pay for $400 haircuts and pricey trips to spas. He used his cancer-stricken wife as a shield from political attacks because he wasn't enough of a man to face his challengers himself. He then cheated on his wife, in all likelihood even when she was diagnosed with terminal cancer. I mean, could the guy be a worse human being? I think the only way he could sink lower is if he raped kittens and murdered Grandma.

So hey, maybe Rielle was right. If he could just get out of his head -- a.k.a, become a different person -- he could be great. Someone find a list of possible brain donors!

And just for old times sake, here's some LOL fun from last summer:

Hat Tip: Hot Air


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/30929.

Comments (7)

Wonder what Hunter will say... (Below threshold)
GarandFan:

Wonder what Hunter will say when the money runs out?

Excellent post! Really like... (Below threshold)
Rose:

Excellent post! Really like to hear "the blogger's take" and not just what the media reports. Seems like Elizabeth Edwards caught on to the affair before Rielle was fired. So, why would Elizabeth Edwards risk the entire Democratic party for the 2008 election by letting her horny, compromised creep of a husband, John, seek the nomination? Seems that Elizabeth is on a power-trip also and not thinking clearly.

Why let John Edwards define... (Below threshold)
Manny:

Why let John Edwards define himself as a narcissist? How is he different from any other cheating husband? Seems to me that he's just a grade A (and stupid) Adulterer.

If John Edwards is a narcissist, then lets compare this to the DSM psychiatric criteria for his personality disorder:

Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) is a personality disorder defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM IV-R), the diagnostic classification system used in the United States, as "a pervasive pattern of grandiosity, need for admiration, and a lack of empathy."

A pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behavior), need for admiration, and lack of empathy, beginning by early adulthood and present in a variety of contexts, as indicated by five (or more) of the following[1]:

1. has a grandiose sense of self-importance
2. is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love
3. believes that he or she is "special" and unique
4. requires excessive admiration
5. has a sense of entitlement
6. is interpersonally exploitative
7. lacks empathy
8. is often envious of others or believes others are envious of him or her
9. shows arrogant, haughty behaviors or attitudes

So, let John Edwards call himself a narcissist. Obviously, someone has told him this in the past. So, if you voted for Edwards, then you have to ask yourself why you would put the United States in the hands of such a person?

Of course, if John Edwards was smart, he'd have claimed that Rielle was simply a surrogate holding his baby (from artificial insemination). Elizabeth had full knowledge and expected the child to be turned over, but John was meeting with Rielle after she reconsidered. This explanation even covers the money payments. Well, seems like John really ain't too bright!! Just a poor liar and a cheat!

Someone may be paranoid wit... (Below threshold)
epador:

Someone may be paranoid without being a paranoid schizophrenic.

Folks with narcissistic Cluster B traits may not have Narcissistic Personality Disorder. These traits are often seen in high achievers. Its inappropriate to link him so impetuously. Although you might want to argue the "high-achiever" label, he has ben very successful at liability torts.

Lets not shrink John Edwards too much. Men have been unfaithful for millennia, sometimes learning and sometimes not from the effect their dalliances have upon others and themselves. The Bible is full of such examples. To label all men who have affairs as irredeemable seems to be a broad inappropriate brush.

His handling of the discovery and cover up of the affair is much more appropriate to discuss than the affair, and how it reflects upon his personality.

Now folks with Borderline Personality Disorder tend to perceive people and events as black or white: either good or evil (sometimes dramatically switching from one to the other with little evident reason). That doesn't mean that posters here who seem to lean dramatically one or another way have BPD, as opposed to BDS. It also doesn't negate the fact that a lot of BS gets spread around here at times.


Cassy, why are you so hard ... (Below threshold)
Imhotep:

Cassy, why are you so hard on the New Age thinkers?

Not very Christian of you to make fun of some one else's belief system....especially one that doesn't involved beheading non-believers and the stoning of females for being raped.

The author of the NewsWeek ... (Below threshold)
epador:

The author of the NewsWeek piece is no lightweight. His article seems genuine.

http://www.newsweek.com/id/33581

Curiouser and curiouser.

Her speech was peppered ... (Below threshold)
drjohn:

Her speech was peppered with New Age jargon--human beings were dragged down by "blockages" to their actual potential;

I guess Edwards blasted through at least one of those "blackages."




Advertisements









rightads.gif

beltwaybloggers.gif

insiderslogo.jpg

mba_blue.gif

Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile

Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

tips@wizbangblog.com

Fresh Links

Credits

Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login



Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy