« WE ARE DESPERATE!!! | Main | Obama And 'Tax Cuts' - Come Again? »

Profiles In Courage

This is truly an odd election. While it's true that every election is unique (as well as "the most important one in history" and will inevitably tally "the most votes ever recorded in a presidential election"), I don't think we've ever seen two tickets where the candidates so perfectly parallel each other -- if you switch the top and bottom of one of them.

On each ticket, you have an older white guy who's been in the Senate for decades. And he's partnered with someone a couple of decades younger, who's exciting and different and inspiring and most definitely NOT a white man. One way or another, this November the white male's lock on the Executive branch is going down -- and as a white male, I couldn't care less.

But there are other parallels, too. Both of the old white guys had their younger lives racked with almost unbearable tragedy.

In 1992 1972, Joe Biden was first elected to the Senate. Before he could take office, his family was involved in a horrible car accident. Biden's wife and daughter were killed; his two sons were gravely injured (but recovered). Biden almost gave up his Senate seat, but was persuaded to keep it and actually took his oath of office at his son's bedside.

(For the record, despite Biden's latest revisions, the accident was NOT caused by a drunk driver.)

As far as John McCain, I keep hearing these rumors that he might have spent some time as a prisoner of war, but I haven't been able to track them down.

On the other end of those tickets, we have two people who have had to face adversity in their lives, but never confronted with violence and danger and tragedy like Biden and McCain have. Rather, they've had opportunities to demonstrate personal courage in other ways, to take chances and be threatened in ways that don't involve life and death. Both found themselves as part of very corrupt political machines, and had to decide how they would react to each.

Sarah Palin, as a rising star of the Alaskan Republican party, found herself under great pressure to "go along to get along," and was given a sinecure as a consolation prize after losing the race for lieutenant governor. Instead of quietly collecting her six-figure annual salary and biding her time to be rewarded, she went after the most corrupt officials in her own Republican party. She took on the chairman of the party, the attorney general, and the sitting governor himelf -- and took them all down.

Barack Obama came up through the ranks of the Chicago Democratic machine, easily one of the most corrupt regimes in the nation. He found himself rubbing elbows with some of the most venal, greedy, abusive, decadent politicians this nation has ever produced.

And what was his response? He went along to get along. He turned a blind eye to the gross misdeeds that went on all around him, never taking his gaze of his ultimate goal of going beyond Chicago.

Over the weekend, David Axelrod, Barack Obama's chief strategist, went on Fox News Sunday. Host Chris Wallace asked him to cite a single time Obama has seriously challenged his own party's leadership, and Axelrod was left sputtering and reciting off-topic talking points.

It's amazing. Barack Obama has made the key point of his campaign "hope and change," but somehow mainly succeeded in energizing the Republicans to put forward two candidates who have actually brought about change, who have not only stood up to their party's leadership, but soundly defeated them. And at the same time, the Democrats' nominees have been revealed as two men who have made a career out of being good team players, of being safe, reliable, consistent party apparatchiks and have been rewarded accordingly for their loyalty.

The choice Americans face this November is getting clearer all the time -- and more confusing.

But always more and more entertaining.

Forget football, baseball, NASCAR, hockey, even cornholing. The single greatest American spectator sport is politics, and it's reasserting its dominance all over again.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/31459.

Comments (8)

Great post!... (Below threshold)

Great post!

In 1992, Joe Biden was f... (Below threshold)
Brian The Adequate:

In 1992, Joe Biden was first elected to the Senate.

1972

Good analysis though as always

For the life of me I cannot... (Below threshold)
WildWillie:

For the life of me I cannot understand why Obama picked one of the most entrenched insider senator for his VP. It made a joke of his "change" motto. Great post JT. ww

I'm from Illinois and when ... (Below threshold)
hermie:

I'm from Illinois and when Obama claimed that he wanted change, while knowing his Daley machine connections, I thought : "Well, that'll be debunked by the press in no time." Of course, that was wishful thinking as the months went by and only John Kass of the Chicago Tribune had the courage to say what a phoney Obama was regarding 'Change'.

To this day, the NYT, the WP, ABC, NBC etc, have had this desire to glean rumors, second-hand whispers, and outright lies about McCain and Palin, but couldn't be bothered to even glance at Obama's actual history in Chicago and Illinois.

Obama benefited greatly from his compliance with Daley Machine dictates. There is no instance whatsoever, that he ever donned the mantle of reformer, and fought the corruption in his own party.

Oh the treachery of using W... (Below threshold)
epador:

Oh the treachery of using Wiki as a reference. You been cornholed, JT.

Quick question.I k... (Below threshold)
ExSubNuke:

Quick question.

I know that Palin is going to be doing an interview now... so it's really a non-issue (as if it EVER was)... but just how many interviews did Biden give since the convention?

If he hasn't, why isn't THAT an issue? It's been 2 weeks since he was named VP. Why is he being protected/sequestered?

If you want to see Obama's ... (Below threshold)

If you want to see Obama's history in Chicago, you could try Obamatracker.com...it is a Chicago based website that has been tracking stories about him for years.

Ted Stevens, Sarah Palin's ... (Below threshold)
yihdego:

Ted Stevens, Sarah Palin's cover up. Explain that away and then I might believe that she is a reformer. She wasn't taking down a corrupt republican for good, she just wanted what he was getting. Which is getting federal money to buy her groceries.




Advertisements









rightads.gif

beltwaybloggers.gif

insiderslogo.jpg

mba_blue.gif

Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile

Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

tips@wizbangblog.com

Fresh Links

Credits

Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login



Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy