« Upside down | Main | Seriously Questionable Timing »

The Silver Lining

It seems that every day another name is leaked about possible Cabinet positions in the Obama administration. And it seems that every one has some serious baggage. John Kerry. Hillary Clinton. Jamie Gorelick. Eric Holder. And so on.

This has quite a few people troubled, but I've found a good way to look at it.

The Cabinet officers are, by and large, extensions of the president. They have some autonomy, but for the most part their role is to carry out the policies of the president. They are essentially advisers.

As such, presidents have been traditionally given a lot of leeway about who they want to hold those offices. They do require approval by the Senate, but the main questions are usually "are they qualified?" and "do they have some legal or ethical or moral issues that would interfere with the duties of the office?"

In that sense, Obama should be given a great deal of latitude in choosing his cabinet. And if he chooses to surround himself with people like those listed above, so be it -- he will be judged on their performance, after all.

But that doesn't mean we can't have a little fun.

Let's suppose that Obama does nominate Eric Holder for Attorney General. Imagine the hearings, should Senate Republicans choose do demonstrate some testicular fortitude. Holder was a key player in the Clinton administration justice department, and was instrumental in the slew of last-minute rush of pardons Clinton issued in his waning days -- most often to people who had made substantial financial donations to the Clintons and their family, to Democrats in general, or were in a position to help Hillary Clinton win her Senate seat.

Gee, wouldn't that be a grand time to ask Holder about his actions when he was leaving office? We could re-hash the whole Clinton pardon scandal all over again, with one of the key figures right there under oath.

Gorelick would be an even bigger circus. The woman has been a "Typhoid Mary" of politics, going from one disastrous policy and institution to another. She was in the Justice Department when she helped craft the horrific "wall of separation" between law enforcement and intelligence agencies. She left that to go to work for Fannie Mae just as it began its accounting fraud. She bailed on them to go serve on the 9/11 Commission (astonishingly, not as a witness, but a Democratically-appointed commissioner), then went on to defend Duke University while it persecuted its lacrosse team for a rape that never happened. I could spend weeks watching her discuss all that and never get bored.

But that's sheerest fantasy. In fact, I wonder if she was brought up only to make whoever else Obama might nominate look good by comparison.

In the end, the Republicans would probably have to allow someone like Holder to take office. But there's no rule that says they can't make him sweat for it.

And it would be more than justified. In fact, I think it would be a moral imperative.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/33052.

Comments (10)

JT, I say the republicans a... (Below threshold)
WildWillie:

JT, I say the republicans adopt the rule the senate democrats used for Ashlcroft. Neuter him. Try to make a joke out of him. Make fun of his religion. Call him corrtupt for recommending pardoning for a criminal that defrauded the government for millions of dollars. They submit his name to the full senate to vote. That is what the senate did to Ashcroft, and he was a senator. ww

"he will be judged on their... (Below threshold)
GarandFan:

"he will be judged on their performance, after all."

I doubt it. The MSM and Obamatons (but I repeat myself) will make excuse after excuse for every fuckup. And there will be A LOT of fuckups.

While Eric Holder is highly... (Below threshold)

While Eric Holder is highly skilled, I'm still deeply troubled by some of his actions under Janet Reno at the Justice Department. And hopefully funny stuff from Bill Clinton won't upstage Hillary as Secretary Of State. These people better be on their very best possible behavior to not be troublesome as well as produce reasonable results or else the public will be very unhappy.

First, I have to apologize ... (Below threshold)
WildWillie:

First, I have to apologize for the misspellings in my first comment. I am at work and sometimes respond "on the fly".

Secondly, Paul, the old saying a tiger does not change its stripes applies here. I think the pouring in of all the Clinton regime already makes it easy for the republican candidate in 2012 to point out how Obama's "change" was a huge hoax. And they will be right.

My advice to Obama: Keep appointing them. ;) ww

Change we can believe in?</... (Below threshold)
P. Bunyan:

Change we can believe in?

The incoming Obama regime is looking more and more like change that scares the hell out of intelligent, informed people.

But it is the kind of change that helps fuel the masturbatory fantacies of the Wizblue authors.

"The MSM and Obamatons (... (Below threshold)
P. Bunyan:

"The MSM and Obamatons (but I repeat myself) will make excuse after excuse for every fuckup. And there will be A LOT of fuckups"

They will only have one excuse, but will use it for everything: It's George Bush's Fault.

Bunyan, I agree, but that e... (Below threshold)
GarandFan:

Bunyan, I agree, but that excuse will wear thin after about 6 months.

Do you think Obama will say... (Below threshold)
Allen:

Do you think Obama will say"you doing a heck of a good job---------, (put any name there). If so, he will just be following Bush's statement, right?

Gorelick, Clinton, Emmanuel... (Below threshold)

Gorelick, Clinton, Emmanuel, Biden, Holder ... wow, I guess it's true. The more things "CHANGE" the more they remain the "SAME".

Bill and Hillary in the Oba... (Below threshold)
John S:

Bill and Hillary in the Obama administration? How stupid! But never interrupt an enemy that's making a big mistake.




Advertisements









rightads.gif

beltwaybloggers.gif

insiderslogo.jpg

mba_blue.gif

Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile

Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links

Credits

Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login



Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy