« Strategic Needs - Why Congress Is Helping the Financial Markets | Main | Apparently there's not enough equality in suicide for feminists »

Not all Experience is Good Experience

With all the economic chaos being hyped by the media and Obama lackeys, it's hard to see the trees through the forest.. It seems every time an administration needs an economic advisory position filled, it turns to Wall Street executives who have run their corporate ships into the shoals of economic ruin. For example, through the last 20 years there have been an inordinate number of ex-Goldman Sachs CEOs and Board members to which the political establishment has turned for economic "leadership". So much so, the firm has been dubbed "Government Sachs".. While this presents an obvious conflict of interest, since these appointed officials will be the ones overseeing and implementing the rules under which firms like Goldman Sachs operate, it also seems to not have worked well for the country economically.. Apparently, Obama will continue with this disingenuous tradition.

Henry Paulson, the current bumbling Secretary of the Treasury, was a board member of Goldman Sachs. At that same time, Jon Corzine was also on the Goldman Sachs board, where he amassed his estimated $320 million dollar fortune when the company IPO was floated. The same fortune he used, some say, to buy his way into the US Senate to the tune of $60 million. Corzine has since been elected Governor of New Jersey (a particularly odious thought, as I live in New Jersey), and was reportedly on Obama's short list for Secretary of the Treasury before he picked Timothy Geithner, the current New York Federal Reserve head.

For all of Obama's rhetoric regarding corporate CEO salaries, bonuses, and private jets, he has chosen to look the other way when floating people such as Gov. Corzine for the post. People like these are fine as long as they are wealthy Democrats and influential liberal contributors.

In fact, according to OpenSecrets.org, 7 of the top 20 political donors are brokerage firms. Out of those 7, 6 have contributed a substantially higher percentage to Democrats than Republicans.

Goldman Sachs is #2 on the list of 100 contributing entities, spending an estimated $4,960,609 in political contributions, with a whopping 73% going to Democratic candidates.

Decimated and weakened, Goldman Sachs is a shell of itself.. It's stock price, which, at the beginning of 2008, was $234 per share, has dropped as low as $47 this year alone. One of the biggest pushers of AIG, it allegedly tried to prime the stock price of the now impotent insurance giant, at one point pumping up the stock to $90 per share right up to the time AIG crashed and burned. This, along with the Democratic mishandling of mortgage slush fund giants Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, was the impetus for all the economic troubles we now face.

And to be barely outdone in the political contribution department, CitiGroup is #3 on the list, with donations of $4,191,630, 64% of which was contributed to Democratic candidates.

Aside from Obama picking other Clinton scraps for his cabinet, Robert Rubin, the treasury secretary under Bill Clinton, and an economic adviser to Obama, worked at Goldman Sachs for 26 years before taking his cabinet post. He, until August 2007, was Chairman of CitiGroup until he resigned, but not before lining his pockets with an estimated $117 million dollars since 1999. This is the same CitiGroup that has just been handed a $306 billion bailout from the government, due to gross mismanagement and risky real estate lending practices.

Not surprisingly, Larry Summers, a protege of Robert Rubin and his Goldman Sachs pedigree, is also now on Obama's economic advisory team..

For all the railings about salaries, bonuses, and corporate jets, Obama has an easy time of ignoring the fortunes of those around which he chooses to collabarate. It seems, however, that this type of action has proved to be a detriment to the economic health of the country, and we could do without this misguided experience for a while.


Wouldn't that be change we can believe in?

By Shawn Mallow



TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/33306.

Comments (6)

2 points:1 - who a... (Below threshold)
DJ Drummond:

2 points:

1 - who are you, O mystery guest? You forgot your tag at the end.

2 - Goldman Sachs is a mixed bag, like many companies. Until recently, GS had a strong reputation. Like most companies, it is neither as bad nor good (depending on the news) as we are told it is.

Sorry about forgeting the t... (Below threshold)
lowmal:

Sorry about forgeting the tag..

Fixed it.

Thanks!

With all of Obama's slogans... (Below threshold)
hermie:

With all of Obama's slogans about 'change', you would think he would actually bring in someone other than the same old players, or the assistants to the same old players.

You bring in the people who were responsible for the financial system debacle, and tell people these guys are going to be responsible for fixing the mess.

Your conflict of interest r... (Below threshold)
ODA315:

Your conflict of interest reference is right on. Why Bush would appoint a WS banker at Sec Tres was a mystery to begin with....well, maybe not.

Unfortunately the more we dig the uglier this thing gets. One need only look at the auto bailout to realize the dept of politician deceipt and self-service we're being subjected to. The bailout has alot more to do with paying back the unions than saving the car companies. Anyone who's gone thru chpt 11 knows what happens to the unions. And how about politician's "friends" like Rubin on Wall Street? He's not the only one btw. If you're a large brokarage or IB firm why wouldn't you put politically-connected people on your board and make them filthy rich?? Need a little "regulatory help" (see Franklin Raines, Barney Frank, Jim Johnson, and Chris Dodd for starters)? Well just make a few "calls" amd all's well.

This shit will continue until WE put a stop to it. Our elected reps have no stomach for it, even if it's "the most ethical congress ever" LOLOLOL.

The choice is ours.

"Change we can DECEIVE in"... (Below threshold)
Robert L:

"Change we can DECEIVE in"

It's no longer a question o... (Below threshold)

It's no longer a question of whether or not we're stuck with cronyism, it's a question of whose pack of cronies we're stuck with.
http://rightklik.blogspot.com/




Advertisements









rightads.gif

beltwaybloggers.gif

insiderslogo.jpg

mba_blue.gif

Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile

Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links

Credits

Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login



Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy