« Obama to Make Foreign Policy Speech in Islamic Capital | Main | My Christmas Gift for Obama »

Wants and Needs

As I sit and listen to the latest fevered announcements on the news or the Internet about the latest economic happenings, I think back to the advice on money given to me by my father:

Wants and Needs.

His point was that until you could distinguish between the two - and act accordingly - you would not get ahead financially. Money, he would say, should be put to work to meet your needs. Only then would you be able to afford those things that you wanted in life.

To be fair, distinguishing between a "want" and "need" isn't always that easy. To my father, a mathematically inclined person denied the chance to finish even high school by the Great Depression; education was a "need" not a "want". With education he believed, people had choices and opportunities that a person without an education did not have. He and my mother worked toward the common goal of a college education for their children above anything else they may have wanted.

But for some, education is a luxury, not a need. Decades ago I read a book written by the mother of a woman who married a distant cousin of mine. She had been born in Lithuania, immigrated to Ohio where she married and the daughter who married my cousin was born. She then returned, with her daughter and husband (an American of Lithuanian heritage), to Lithuania to buy a farm and to give birth to a son. As the situation in Europe deteriorated, her husband and daughter, as American citizens, were permitted to leave and go back to Ohio. It would be over 20 years before she saw either one of them again.

One night Soviet troops came to her home and she just had moments to decide what possessions to take with her to sustain her and her son in the Gulag. I don't recall the entire list of what she took but one thing still stands out years later - lard. She credited lard with sustaining their lives until she could figure out the system and find a new source of food. How many of us could, in a few minutes, choose those items we need to sustain life not only for ourselves, but our children AND carry it with us?

So, what does this all have to do with the economic crisis we're currently find ourselves in? A few specific moments come to mind:

1) Private Jets: Hat in hand begging for money from the American tax payers, auto execs went to Washington in not one, but three private jets. Throughout this crisis, those who helped create it have been unbelievably tone deaf about their own situations.

American taxpayers may not have to choose what items to take to the Gulag, but they are cutting back and not because it is what they want to do. Hearing that the leaders of the big three auto makers can't even fly commercial in a crisis does nothing to convince anyone that a real crisis exists.

And what of the lawmakers listening to their pleas? We have lawmakers who have sweetheart deals from mortgage lenders they supposedly were overseeing and others who don't think the tax code - that they helped to write - should apply to them. Can they be trusted to look out for the American taxpayer?

2) Economic gurus: Are there two who agree on what should be done in this crisis? Every time you turn the page or a station, there seems to be another opinion. If there is a consensus, it isn't apparent ... and not helped by seeing friends of those gurus getting their own piece of the bailout pie.

3) The media: When the experts and the lawmakers cannot be trusted to tell the truth, who can we go to but the media to ask the hard questions? Or can we?

Anyone who has taken a look at the bottom line of various media outlets knows that they are likely to be the next in the bailout line. It isn't in their own self-interest to ask too many of the hard questions let alone to follow up until those people responsible provide some real answers.

So, we, the American tax payers, are screwed. Or are we?

It's time to ask ourselves what is it we want and what is it that we need.

Don't understand what your real financial situation is - or are you afraid to find out? Suck it up and ask someone you personally feel that you can trust to explain it to you. You can't do anything about it until you know where you really stand. This type of education is a need, not a want, in this circumstance.

Warning - it may not be fun. Too many of us have too much debt.

However, a certain amount of the stress many of us are feeling these days is manufactured stress. We don't know where we really stand and we are afraid to find out because, if we do, then we will have to take some responsibility to do something about it.

Well - surprise. You may not be in all that bad of shape and some of your worry may be unnecessary.

Then take an honest look at what your wants and needs are and do something about it. Do it as a couple (if applicable) and include the kids if they are old enough. Make it a family project to find places that you can save. Pick a goal to work toward together. Depend on yourselves first, but be educated about your choices and your opportunities. Then, help someone else do the same.

It's a good bet that your lawmaker or a CEO of a major corporation is not going to be looking out for you.

Author: Rose Hughes (OhioAnne)


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/33341.

Comments (6)

Great post,replete with com... (Below threshold)
Dave Noble:

Great post,replete with common sense(like they say in the add, "priceless")

I know I'm in the .0001% mi... (Below threshold)
Les Nessman:

I know I'm in the .0001% minority on this, but here goes:

I'm sick to death of hearing about this 'private jets issue'. These are the bosses of multi-billion dollar international businesses. You want them to waste their time driving 13 hours thru the night to go from Detroit to D.C. and then testify before congress? (One local a-hole radio host was whining about the CEOs flying, then when he heard they were going to drive to D.C., he started whining that the CEOs probably wouldn't actually do all the driving themselves and would have a chauffer drive them.)

Or you want them to fly commercial (coach, of course, or else everyone would bitch about them flying first-class)? Have you flown recently? So we have them waiting around the airport for hours instead of working. (Ignore the hype, WIFI isn't as good as working in a real work environment).
"Gee, Mr. CEO, why did you miss the most important meeting of your company's life?"
'Well, my commercial flight was delayed. I couldn't take a private jet because that would 'look bad'. Oh well.'

I know the car CEOs helped eff up their companies. I know we are supposed to boo and hiss when we see them. Fine. I'll go along with all that. But come on, people.

This is one of the practical, useful purposes of a private jet. Let's not get too carried away with the class warfare.

I agree with you. Let's no... (Below threshold)
Rose Hughes:

I agree with you. Let's not get carried away with "class warfare" ... like by suggesting that CEO's should NEVER mingle with the little folk who just happen to buy their product.

Believe it or not, CEO's of various corporations fly commercial everyday - some even do it on purpose. It gives them an opportunity to get a sense of the concerns that the people who actually buy their product or service have day to day.

I am not suggesting - nor have I ever suggested - that the CEO's of the car companies should fly commercial exclusively.

However, there is a time and place to *NOT* do "business as usual" and one of them is when you are on the verge of bankruptcy.

If driving 13 hours from Michigan allows you to showcase a car that you believe is the future of your company AND it gets you 25 billion dollars, then it is a cheap use of your time.

Look, I understand: the car... (Below threshold)
Les Nessman:

Look, I understand: the car CEOs are the villans in the public's minds. I get that. I even agree with it for the most part.

If they fly private jet, people will bitch about it.
If they fly commercial, people will bitch that they should fly coach.
If they fly at all, people will bitch that they should have driven.

If they drive, people will bitch that they shouldn't have driven SUVs, they should have driven the cheapest econo-box the company makes.

If they drive el cheapo econo-boxes thru the night to get to a meeting in D.C. the next morning, people will bitch that the CEOs didn't actually do all the driving themselves.(Yes, I actually did hear the local radio host whine about this.)

If they come to town riding a donkey while wearing sackcloth and ashes, people will bitch about cruelty to animals.

pffft. Whatever. Whether they fly or not, it's just about P.R. and public image. People will waste time talking about this, meanwhile there are more important real issues to debate in this car company debacle.

Fire all of the current car CEOs and let the new guys use private jets when they need to.


Funny thing is that I am no... (Below threshold)
Rose Hughes:

Funny thing is that I am not the one who is continuing to discuss the issue - you are. I not only never said what you are discussing, I have already rejected it.

You are the one that is placing the importance on automaker CEO's flying jets at will regardless of the circumstance.

So, it begs the question:

Why, in the midst of an economic crisis that threatens to send the automakers into bankruptcy (or so they claim), do you believe that it is an important issue to save their "right" to travel whenever and wherever they choose by private jet?

"Funny thing is that I a... (Below threshold)
Les Nessman:

"Funny thing is that I am not the one who is continuing to discuss the issue.."
Actually, since you just typed that sentence, you are.

"do you believe that it is an important issue to save their "right" to travel whenever and wherever they choose by private jet? "

I don't.
I think it is a small, almost non-issue that keeps cropping up in nearly every story I have read about this issue lately, including your article. So I responded to it, I didn't initiate it.

Also, I guess I find it especially galling to hear lawmakers complain about CEOs flying in private jets while asking for money, when gov't leaders do the exact same thing.

Look, as I said previously, I know I am in the distinct minority on this subject. I'm not trying to pick a fight or be disrespectful with you or anyone else on this.

I don't know why this pushed my button, but it did. 99.999% of the people think it's a Big Deal that CEOs are flying private jets, I don't think it's all that horrible.
finis.




Advertisements









rightads.gif

beltwaybloggers.gif

insiderslogo.jpg

mba_blue.gif

Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile

Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links

Credits

Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login



Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy