Just when I was beginning to resign myself to the fact that the auto industry would eventually get its bailout and its current failing business model would continue as usual, I am met with some great news. Thank goodness there's a Republican with a backbone. Senator Richard Shelby is threatening to filibuster any auto bailout bill.
Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.), a staunch ally of the U.S. carmakers, and Shelby, who has emerged as the leading opponent of any aid package for the Big Three, sparred over the whether the American government should rescue U.S. automakers during an appearance on "Fox News Sunday."Levin said he was "confident" that Congress would consider a bailout bill for the auto industry, but stopped short of predicting whether it would pass. Democratic leaders in the House and Senate are considering a $15 billion "bridge loan" to help out the automakers.
"I think they're very close to a deal, I think there will be a deal and that will happen in 24 hours," Levin told host Chris Wallace. "Obviously, that's a much more complicated question of whether the votes are there. What I'm confident of is that a bill will be introduced."
But Shelby, who also voted against the $700 bailout bill for the financial industry, called it a "bridge loan to nowhere," and said General Motors, Ford and Chrysler have to undergo a fundamental restructuring of their operations rather than look for federal help.
He also predicted auto industry executives would soon come back to Washington looking for more money, beyond any assistance they are given now.
"This is a down payment on many billions to come," Shelby warned. "This is not something that happened overnight. This is 30 years in the making. These companies basically have failed or are failing. They probably need, according to some people, about 60 percent of the management to go, and about 40 percent downsize of the workers."
Shelby also threatened a filibuster of any auto aid agreement, but was unsure whether he had the votes to sustain it.
He may not have enough votes to sustain a filibuster right now, but that could easily change with the vast majority of Americans opposing any auto industry bailout. People don't want good money being thrown after bad, and the contracts that the US auto companies are strapped with right now are killing them. No amount of money from the US government can save them. They need to declare Chapter 11, get out of their contracts, and reorganize their companies.
Of course the CEO's don't want to do that because they'd lose their jobs. The UAW leadership don't want bankruptcy because they'd lose their jobs. Yes, some line workers would lose their jobs as well, but they've been living pretty high on the hog with high hourly wages and super expensive health care packages. It's time to come down to the reality the rest of us are living.
Update: Some commenters on this post are arguing that filing Chapter 11 would ruin the US auto industry, but this is totally wrong. Chapter 11 will benefit these companies in the long run. Besides, this is what Chapter 11 is for. Anyone who says Americans won't buy cars from these companies because the warranties won't be honored if they enter Chapter 11 don't know what they're talking about. If the Big 3 went into Chapter 11, all warranties would be priority claims and would be paid before almost anything else. The companies could run advertising campaigns to let their customers know that they can buy cars without any fear that their warranties wouldn't be honored. Many companies entered Chapter 11 over the years and have come out on the other side significantly stronger and better run companies. Owens Corning and K-Mart are two companies that are vastly improved since their Chapter 11 filings.
Besides, if these companies are in such bad shape that even Chapter 11 can't help them, then they should go the way of the buggy whip as far as I'm concerned. Under no circumstances should the American people be forced to support companies that have such awful business models that they can't sustain themselves. Since nature abhors a vacuum, I'm certain an enterprising and intelligent businessman will see the huge market available and will take the risk and start his own American car company. That means he will be required to American workers and American business will begin anew, free from the entanglements that are killing the American automakers now. Just imagine the kinds of exciting and cutting edge cars that could be produced with fresh thinking and an innovative business model.






Comments (6)
It must be nice to be in a ... (Below threshold)1. Posted by jpm100 | December 8, 2008 12:10 AM | Score: -5 (7 votes cast)
It must be nice to be in a position to kill industry in another state in order to help their competitors in your own state.
Which happen in be in your state from billion dollar inducements you helped get them.
A state that consistently takes more Federal tax dollars than it pays freeing up money for those inducements.
And the state that your killing the industry in consistently pays more Federal taxes than they take.
1. Posted by jpm100 | December 8, 2008 12:10 AM |
Score: -5 (7 votes cast)
Posted on December 8, 2008 00:10
2. Posted by jmc | December 8, 2008 12:11 AM | Score: -5 (7 votes cast)
Actually Kim about 2-4 million people would lose their jobs if we lose our auto industry.
Not to mention the people who stayed in a crap job for 30 years so they could get their pension. Instead of retirement they would get to return to their workforce in their 50s and 60s with their retirement gone, and an exciting career as wall mart greeters ahead of them. This would be a disaster for America.
2. Posted by jmc | December 8, 2008 12:11 AM |
Score: -5 (7 votes cast)
Posted on December 8, 2008 00:11
3. Posted by Brian | December 8, 2008 1:18 AM | Score: -5 (5 votes cast)
Roll over for the $1 trillion giveaway (which Republicans supported once enough pork was added to satisfy them), but stand firm against the $15 billion loan. That's what passes for "backbone" these days amongst the right?
3. Posted by Brian | December 8, 2008 1:18 AM |
Score: -5 (5 votes cast)
Posted on December 8, 2008 01:18
4. Posted by JFO | December 8, 2008 7:23 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Nothing like a whore (Shelby) for the Japanese and German auto industries suggesting a filibuster against American auto companies. You go Priestap.
4. Posted by JFO | December 8, 2008 7:23 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on December 8, 2008 07:23
5. Posted by AT | December 8, 2008 8:52 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Why do you hate American workers so much that you will help foreigners and become an American traitor?
5. Posted by AT | December 8, 2008 8:52 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on December 8, 2008 08:52
6. Posted by Rick Caird | December 8, 2008 10:09 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Sheesh, no one is talking about losing the auto industry. People are talking about chapter 11 vs $34 billion in loans. We will not be losing 2-4 million jobs. If the pensions are not sustainable, then they have to be modified. It is extremely doubtful they vanish unless GM does, in fact, close the doors, but chapter 11 does not close the doors.
Their are two problems with the loans. The first is there is little indication of a restructuring that will go along with the loans to bring costs in line with the rest of the industry. Secondly, Congress is taking this opportunity to tell the manufacturers what to build and sell. Congress cannot run their own business. What makes them think they are now automotive engineers and marketing executives?
Rick
6. Posted by Rick Caird | December 8, 2008 10:09 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on December 8, 2008 10:09