What if they built an airport but nobody will fly there.
Japan's $268 million Ibaraki Airport is on schedule to open for business in March 2010. The hard part will be persuading an airline to fly there.No major Japanese airlines flying into it, over two hours from Tokyo by car, no train service. Will the bright person or person step forward so I can give you a Knucklehead award.The government and Ibaraki prefecture, home to 3 million people, are paying for the airport north of Tokyo, which won't have train services and is a half-hour drive from Ibaraki's capital, Mito. Japan Airlines Corp. and All Nippon Airways Co., which operate 90 percent of flights in the country, don't plan to use it.
As the global credit crunch drives Japan into its first recession since 2001, the country is building roads and airports that have helped make it the world's most indebted major economy. Critics say many of the projects have little economic value beyond the building industry.
"The government is squeezing health care and other social programs and then spending billions and trillions of yen on useless construction projects," said Stephen Church, an economist at securities researcher JapanInvest in Tokyo. "Ibaraki is just a small example of that."
Japan has borrowed money every year since 1965 to finance its budget, saddling each household with the equivalent of 17 million yen ($182,000) in debt. The spending has pushed the government's debt to the highest among the Group of Seven economies -- 170 percent of annual gross domestic product last year, compared with 63 percent in the U.S., according to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
No Planes
Ibaraki's airfield will open just as Japan's biggest international airport, Narita, an hour's drive to the south, completes an expansion. Tokyo's Haneda airport, the world's fourth-busiest, is set to open a new runway the same year.
"We're not planning any flights from Ibaraki Airport," Japan Air President Haruka Nishimatsu said on Dec. 2. "It's out of the question."
His company and All Nippon have cut unprofitable local routes and slashed profit forecasts this year as higher jet-fuel prices and a global economic slowdown led to fewer passengers.
Japan Air recorded its biggest decline in international passengers in five years in September, while All Nippon flew fewer people overseas for a seventh straight month.
I've been to Japan and Narita aka Tokyo-Narita airport. Narita Airport is well over an hour by car from central Tokyo, something thanks be to God, I never attempted. The very convenient Narita Express train service will get you to Tokyo in about an hour. The trains were clean and comfortable when the wife and I traveled in one back in 1994.
Nikita Khrushchev would have been so proud of the people who pushed the Ibaraki Airport project. Politicians really are the same all over. They build airports without airlines to fly to it.
Comments (4)
So as a makework project it... (Below threshold)1. Posted by JLawson | December 7, 2008 4:35 PM | Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
So as a makework project it was a success, in that it put people to work.
As a usable airport, it's a failure - because it's not going to have any traffic worth measuring, because it's built so far out in the metaphorical boonies that no airline wants to give it service. Without planes flying in and out, it's going to be hard to recoup the cost of building it. So - economically it's a net loss.
It's all very well to talk about government projects to stimulate the economy - but every project ends eventually, and there'd better be something created by that project that actually needs jobs or creates jobs, otherwise the money's wasted.
(Hoover Dam, for example, is an example of a project that created a lot of jobs short-term, but had long-term ramifications and results that FAR outshone the temporary economic stimulus of the workers wages.)
1. Posted by JLawson | December 7, 2008 4:35 PM |
Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on December 7, 2008 16:35
2. Posted by GarandFan | December 7, 2008 4:45 PM | Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Just wait, you haven't seen anything. Let's see what kind of car Congress can come up with. Will it be called a Reidmobile or a Pelosi? Probably have 3 engines. One gas, one bio-fuel, one solar. All hooked to a battery that will contain a 15 minute charge. 3 tires (so that you can run 4 cars instead of 3). It'll also be bio-degradable if left out in direct sunlight for more that 2 weeks. Probably cost about $100,000 each.
2. Posted by GarandFan | December 7, 2008 4:45 PM |
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on December 7, 2008 16:45
3. Posted by bobdog | December 7, 2008 7:20 PM | Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Hey, kids! I've got an idea! Let's replace the heating and air conditioning systems in all of our government buildings! Look at the jobs we could create!
Then let's resurface all of our highways! What a great idea! Plus, we can do it all over again in four years after we get re-elected!
Why don't we just pass a regulation requiring all government vehicles to overinflate their tires? Think of the jobs we could create around that - a rulemaking and testing body, an enforcement arm, liason positions with the tire industry, a government mandated tire pressure gauge certification facility. Why the list is endless.
Considering the cost of all these giveaway programs and makework projects, how long will it be before we stop worrying about recession and start worrying about hyperinflation?
3. Posted by bobdog | December 7, 2008 7:20 PM |
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on December 7, 2008 19:20
4. Posted by Matt | December 7, 2008 11:34 PM | Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Sounds a lot like the Denver Airport. To far out from the city to do any good, not roads, no train service etc. Only built to support freinds and relatives of the Mayor and airport commission. Still waiting for it to fail, any minute now...
4. Posted by Matt | December 7, 2008 11:34 PM |
Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on December 7, 2008 23:34