President-elect Obama has denied any direct contact with Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich. He hasn't denied that others may have been in contact with Blagojevich. From the criminal complaint it seems that Blagojevich knew that he wasn't going to get a deal from Obama, leading many to believe that did attempt to (either directly or indirectly) cash in by offering to appoint Obama's close friend and adviser Valerie Jarrett for the Senate seat for a price.
Blagojevich indicates in the transcripts that he knows that he won't get a deal from Obama. How did he know that? One would presume that he knew that because he asked.
Earlier I noted that a tipster has floated the possibility that Obama's chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, reported Blagojevich to the feds. Emanuel has reportedly denied that story.
If Emanuel was aware of the pay for play scheme (Note: There's no evidence of that yet) things might get much messier for Emanuel and Obama. Consider the following scenario:
- Blagojevich tries to strong-arm Emanuel for money to select Obama's preferred candidate.
- Emanuel balks at the "pay for play" plan.
- Emanuel takes no further action.
That means the Chief of Staff to the President-elect knew of a plot to auction off the President-elect's former Senate seat and did nothing to stop it. That's not good.
Emanuel better hope there's nothing to connect him, or anyone else in the transition team, to the Governor's scheme or Obama's going to have to throw someone else under the bus...






Comments (34)
Your desparation to dispara... (Below threshold)1. Posted by Smiles | December 9, 2008 9:21 PM | Score: -13 (23 votes cast)
Your desparation to disparage Obama is pathetic.
1. Posted by Smiles | December 9, 2008 9:21 PM |
Score: -13 (23 votes cast)
Posted on December 9, 2008 21:21
2. Posted by Hal | December 9, 2008 9:37 PM | Score: 8 (14 votes cast)
And yours to uplift The(Wrong)One is equally so.
2. Posted by Hal | December 9, 2008 9:37 PM |
Score: 8 (14 votes cast)
Posted on December 9, 2008 21:37
3. Posted by epador | December 9, 2008 9:38 PM | Score: 5 (13 votes cast)
Your desperation to ignore the Obama work ethic is predictable, slimeez.
3. Posted by epador | December 9, 2008 9:38 PM |
Score: 5 (13 votes cast)
Posted on December 9, 2008 21:38
4. Posted by Smiles | December 9, 2008 10:01 PM | Score: -5 (13 votes cast)
There is no evidence what so ever that Obama new anything yet you make wild accusations. You might as well call this site the National Wizbang Enquirer.
4. Posted by Smiles | December 9, 2008 10:01 PM |
Score: -5 (13 votes cast)
Posted on December 9, 2008 22:01
5. Posted by Tom Blogical
| December 9, 2008 10:10 PM | Score: 7 (9 votes cast)
"You might as well call this site the National Wizbang Enquirer."
As I recall, the National Enquirer broke the John Edwards mistress scandal, and liberals were scoffing then, too.
I think it would be wise for everyone to wait until all the details come out before drawing any conclusions yet.
5. Posted by Tom Blogical
| December 9, 2008 10:10 PM |
Score: 7 (9 votes cast)
Posted on December 9, 2008 22:10
6. Posted by DaveD | December 9, 2008 10:17 PM | Score: 1 (3 votes cast)
I agree with Tom B. completely. I think it is appropriate to watch from the sidelines and stop speculating at this point.
6. Posted by DaveD | December 9, 2008 10:17 PM |
Score: 1 (3 votes cast)
Posted on December 9, 2008 22:17
7. Posted by Allen | December 9, 2008 10:28 PM | Score: -7 (13 votes cast)
I also agree with Tom B, But so many GOP people have their crystal balls, and they just know everything.
The only ones who really know is mostly likely the US Attorney, yup, the same one the GOP called all kinds of names, etc when he nailed good old Scooter Libby for the lying scumbag he is.
But like Tom said: just wait until all the details come out.
7. Posted by Allen | December 9, 2008 10:28 PM |
Score: -7 (13 votes cast)
Posted on December 9, 2008 22:28
8. Posted by Crusty Dem | December 9, 2008 10:33 PM | Score: -3 (13 votes cast)
There is absolutely no reason to believe this is true. None, nada, zip, zero. The whole article is absurd speculation.
8. Posted by Crusty Dem | December 9, 2008 10:33 PM |
Score: -3 (13 votes cast)
Posted on December 9, 2008 22:33
9. Posted by Speculation | December 9, 2008 10:49 PM | Score: 1 (3 votes cast)
Tom, I agree, it is unfair to speculate until more details are known.
I certainly believe if found guilty, Blagojevich should rot in a jail cell. However,I do find it rather odd that one month after Republicans were defeated pretty convincingly and one month before the inauguration they finally decide to press charges on a guy they have been investigating for four years! There is politics at play here folks. Get ready for a GOP comeback in two years.
The real concern is, when will our system rid itself of corruption, ego, partisan bickering and finger pointing? My best guess is when we the voter stop buying the BS from both parties and give em the boot.
9. Posted by Speculation | December 9, 2008 10:49 PM |
Score: 1 (3 votes cast)
Posted on December 9, 2008 22:49
10. Posted by jmc | December 9, 2008 11:02 PM | Score: -3 (11 votes cast)
I'd say that pretty much sums up your whole post Kevin.
10. Posted by jmc | December 9, 2008 11:02 PM |
Score: -3 (11 votes cast)
Posted on December 9, 2008 23:02
11. Posted by Baron Von Ottomatic | December 9, 2008 11:12 PM | Score: 7 (7 votes cast)
Does the Republican party even have a pulse in Illinois? Anyone who could make a run at the Senate seat in a special election? Someone who could take the Governor seat?
11. Posted by Baron Von Ottomatic | December 9, 2008 11:12 PM |
Score: 7 (7 votes cast)
Posted on December 9, 2008 23:12
12. Posted by GianiD | December 9, 2008 11:42 PM | Score: 1 (3 votes cast)
Axelrod has admitted on tape speaking with the lying lib guv.
The left will brush this off, but, this is the only way libs know how to operate.
Maybe MSNBC can startup a Lockup:Libs series with Wm Jefferson, the Ill. Gov, rezco, etc etc etc
12. Posted by GianiD | December 9, 2008 11:42 PM |
Score: 1 (3 votes cast)
Posted on December 9, 2008 23:42
13. Posted by hyperbolist | December 9, 2008 11:42 PM | Score: 0 (10 votes cast)
Doesn't Alan Keyes still own a home in Illinois, Baron?
13. Posted by hyperbolist | December 9, 2008 11:42 PM |
Score: 0 (10 votes cast)
Posted on December 9, 2008 23:42
14. Posted by Marc | December 9, 2008 11:57 PM | Score: 2 (6 votes cast)
"speculation" - "There is politics at play here folks. Get ready for a GOP comeback in two years."
I guess the simple fact obama was just elected and his Senate seat became available never crossed your mind before you knee-jerked your way into wimpering about how "they been investigating for four years!"
14. Posted by Marc | December 9, 2008 11:57 PM |
Score: 2 (6 votes cast)
Posted on December 9, 2008 23:57
15. Posted by Mersman | December 10, 2008 12:30 AM | Score: 2 (8 votes cast)
It is looking more and more likely that it was Emmanuel that helped expose Blagojevich and speed up the federal prosecutor's case. It takes time to get a wiretap and it takes time to gather evidence. These accusations are dangerous and way too early. The guy you are accusing is likely the guy who blew the whistle on this whole thing.
15. Posted by Mersman | December 10, 2008 12:30 AM |
Score: 2 (8 votes cast)
Posted on December 10, 2008 00:30
16. Posted by Kirk | December 10, 2008 12:58 AM | Score: -8 (14 votes cast)
"Axelrod has admitted on tape speaking with the lying lib guv."
Source?
"The left will brush this off, but, this is the only way libs know how to operate."
Umm, yeah, it works the same on both side. Deny, scream, and make excuses when a scandal arises. Then when the evidence is insurmountable, only then does the accused party shut up. But I guess you don't notice that the Repubs do the same thing...
"Maybe MSNBC can startup a Lockup:Libs series with Wm Jefferson, the Ill. Gov, rezco, etc etc etc"
Umm, there's actually more Republicans who've been convicted recently than Democrats, and that trend will probably continue for a while. But, of course, an extreme right winger also wouldn't notice that either.
16. Posted by Kirk | December 10, 2008 12:58 AM |
Score: -8 (14 votes cast)
Posted on December 10, 2008 00:58
17. Posted by peabody3000 | December 10, 2008 1:33 AM | Score: -7 (13 votes cast)
pick your battles, neocons... this kind of behavior happens every day all over the country and within every party. to me, obama's biggest challenge, providing he is anywhere near as clean as he projects (yes, yes, i know most right-wingers will be giving no benefit of doubt), would be leading a non-corrupt government effectively. he'll have to pull a major coup to obstruct corrupt govt-business-as-usual and not to become a serpico figure hung out to dry by friends and foes alike
17. Posted by peabody3000 | December 10, 2008 1:33 AM |
Score: -7 (13 votes cast)
Posted on December 10, 2008 01:33
18. Posted by Eric | December 10, 2008 6:29 AM | Score: 6 (6 votes cast)
I suggest some of you geniuses actually read the indictment by Fitzgerald.
1) The investigation of Blago has been going on for years for other reasons.
2) The wiretapping began before the election and was approved by a Federal Judge.
3) Blago allegedly started auctioning off the seat BEFORE the election
4) The indictment indicates that Blago had conversations with Obama's people, the Smoking Gun says that the person identified in the indictment as "President-Elect Advisor" is Rahm Emmanuel. Obviously, Blago had conversations with Obama's people, otherwise how would Blago know that there was no deal. In the indictment Blago is furious with Obama for not giving him any deal.
So somebody in Obama's camp knew that Blago was auctioning off the seat. Did they or didn't they go to the DoJ about it?
The right is leaping to the conclusion that he didn't, the left is leaping to the conclusion that he did. Frankly, we don't know yet, because Fitz hasn't said one way or the other.
18. Posted by Eric | December 10, 2008 6:29 AM |
Score: 6 (6 votes cast)
Posted on December 10, 2008 06:29
19. Posted by Oyster | December 10, 2008 6:31 AM | Score: 2 (12 votes cast)
I question the timing.
I don't know about you guys, but I'm girding my loins.
19. Posted by Oyster | December 10, 2008 6:31 AM |
Score: 2 (12 votes cast)
Posted on December 10, 2008 06:31
20. Posted by epador | December 10, 2008 7:28 AM | Score: 2 (6 votes cast)
Pea, if Obama hadn't risen on the stinking shoulders of Illinois Chicago corruption, you might have a point. But you don't, only an attempt at Orwellian Newspeak that fails our BS filter.
20. Posted by epador | December 10, 2008 7:28 AM |
Score: 2 (6 votes cast)
Posted on December 10, 2008 07:28
21. Posted by epador | December 10, 2008 7:33 AM | Score: 1 (9 votes cast)
I do have to agree with slimeez (4.) that nothing is new to Obama, and he never new anything. He always do the same Ol' thing he always done.
21. Posted by epador | December 10, 2008 7:33 AM |
Score: 1 (9 votes cast)
Posted on December 10, 2008 07:33
22. Posted by Pretzel Logic | December 10, 2008 8:43 AM | Score: 1 (7 votes cast)
Barry and Blago are thick as thieves. It was only in the last few weeks as Barrys people caught wind of what Fitz had that they stiff armed Blago. Just like JFK dissin Sinatra.
22. Posted by Pretzel Logic | December 10, 2008 8:43 AM |
Score: 1 (7 votes cast)
Posted on December 10, 2008 08:43
23. Posted by Lynette | December 10, 2008 10:48 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I would think that the guy who informed would be the good guy in this case. Of course, no one is going to just yelp something like that as soon as he gets wind of it; it has to be investigated so whether the person heard it three months ago or yesterday seems hardly a reason for finger-pointing.
23. Posted by Lynette | December 10, 2008 10:48 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on December 10, 2008 10:48
24. Posted by peabody3000 | December 10, 2008 1:06 PM | Score: -1 (7 votes cast)
epador - i think the term "orwellian newspeak" is itself a good example of orwellian newspeak. there is however that small kernal of cogent thought in your response: yes obama comes from the illinois political arena. that mere guilt-by-association angle wasnt a point of this blog post, but yes, as america already well knows, obama has practiced politics in a famously corrution-tinged state. you have my unending gratitude for digging deep and pointing that out, lest any of us forget the long history, from al capone to mayor daley, of chicago. you get a gold star
=]
24. Posted by peabody3000 | December 10, 2008 1:06 PM |
Score: -1 (7 votes cast)
Posted on December 10, 2008 13:06
25. Posted by HughS | December 10, 2008 1:48 PM | Score: 4 (4 votes cast)
Rick Moran is asking the same questions:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/12/democratic_party_scandal_how_h.html
If Emanuel is "Advisor B" he's dancing awfully close to the fire.
25. Posted by HughS | December 10, 2008 1:48 PM |
Score: 4 (4 votes cast)
Posted on December 10, 2008 13:48
26. Posted by tammy | December 10, 2008 2:11 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Obama and his aides disparage themselves great and do not need our help with it!!
26. Posted by tammy | December 10, 2008 2:11 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on December 10, 2008 14:11
27. Posted by max | December 10, 2008 2:16 PM | Score: -3 (5 votes cast)
Wow, wizbang never ceases to amuse me.
I say you put Kim on the case. She'll get to the bottom of it.
And Oyster, what does that even mean?
27. Posted by max | December 10, 2008 2:16 PM |
Score: -3 (5 votes cast)
Posted on December 10, 2008 14:16
28. Posted by speculation | December 10, 2008 3:51 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Marc, I am not wimpering about anthing. I am simply stating that it is typical that when one party is down, the other always seems to make a comeback because the other one is plagued with scandals. Personally, I think both parties are worthless turds.
28. Posted by speculation | December 10, 2008 3:51 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on December 10, 2008 15:51
29. Posted by epador | December 10, 2008 4:59 PM | Score: 0 (4 votes cast)
As Obama participated and used the corrupt political machine, rather than deftly maneuvering around it, in the Chicago area, your attempt at spinning dexterously (or perhaps sinisterly) is simply a flat spin into uncontrolled flight, leading to abrupt kinetic disassembly, P3.
29. Posted by epador | December 10, 2008 4:59 PM |
Score: 0 (4 votes cast)
Posted on December 10, 2008 16:59
30. Posted by peabody3000 | December 10, 2008 5:27 PM | Score: 1 (3 votes cast)
abrupt kinetic disassembly... orwell called. he wants his newspeak back haha
please describe in any meaningful way how obama "used the corrupt political machine"
dont "deftly maneuver arount it" =] lets hear it
30. Posted by peabody3000 | December 10, 2008 5:27 PM |
Score: 1 (3 votes cast)
Posted on December 10, 2008 17:27
31. Posted by WildWillie | December 10, 2008 6:21 PM | Score: 0 (6 votes cast)
I am having a great laugh. Obama hasn't even been sworn in and his people are already in trouble with the law. Not surprised but I am by the speed. Axlerod knew, Obama's close campaign manager but not Obama. That is sweet. I love all the ah's and um's Obama threw out at that impromptu question. This is going to be a really fun two years. ww
31. Posted by WildWillie | December 10, 2008 6:21 PM |
Score: 0 (6 votes cast)
Posted on December 10, 2008 18:21
32. Posted by J House | December 11, 2008 9:19 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
If Rahm is the 'President-elect advisor', he will have to resign.
He was asked by reporters today, and he didn't issue a denial.
He could not have fignered Blago to the Feds. They have had him under court-auth. surv. for months, likely before any discussions came up on Obama's open Senate seat.
32. Posted by J House | December 11, 2008 9:19 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on December 11, 2008 21:19
33. Posted by tammi | December 11, 2008 11:38 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
'President-elect advisor' was mentioned only as someone Blago wanted to ask for a favor, but whoever he talked to in the Obama administration was not playing ball in regards to the Senate seat, so no reason to believe they were willing to help him out with anything else he wanted, especially since the Feds are not going after anyone besides Blago and his cos.
33. Posted by tammi | December 11, 2008 11:38 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on December 11, 2008 23:38
34. Posted by Zoe | December 11, 2008 11:46 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Just a few days ago, people were saying Rahm was the one who ratted Blagojevich out.
34. Posted by Zoe | December 11, 2008 11:46 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on December 11, 2008 23:46