« Out in the cold again *UPDATED* | Main | Ted Kennedy back in D. C. »

The Obvious, Overdue

Utah should be the national champion in NCAA Division 1 football this year. No, I am not a fan of the Utes particularly, in fact I have not even seen them play a single game, but they hold a qualification unique in major college football; they are the only undefeated team among the major colleges. The 31-17 Sugar Bowl win over Alabama was Utah's second BCS bowl win as an undefeated team in the last four years.

Yet the BCS committee has already decided that the winner of Thursday's game between Oklahoma and Florida will be the National Champion. Never mind that both teams have lost a game and Utah has not, never mind that Utah beat 4th-ranked Alabama handily on both sides of the ball. Utah is not from the "right" conference, so even perfect is not good enough.

Some of the readers may suspect that I am not completely serious in selling Utah as the National Champion, and to a degree I agree that Utah does not strike me as a champion in the way that other teams might, but the NCAA has failed to allow the obvious resolution - let the contenders play for the title. Every other NCAA sport has playoffs to determine the champion, in fact every other level of football, from pee wee to the professional leagues has playoffs to decide the matter. Even the NCAA has playoffs for football - except for Division 1. There is simply no honest argument against having a playoff, and everyone knows it. And for all the noise from the schools which have tried to make the championship a Good-ol-Boys club reserved for the largest state schools, the facts are plain to anyone who has played the game.

1. Scoreboard trumps all other arguments
2. If you think your 1-loss team is the champ when someone else is undefeated, see rule 1.

So there you are. No one but Utah made it through the schedule without losing along the way. Utah beat Michigan at Ann Arbor to start the season, finished by beating Alabama in the Sugar Bowl, and in between scored 40 or more points six times (30 or more ten times), and held four opponents to 10 points or less. But most of all, Utah won all of their games.

Scoreboard.

Should someone else be national champion? When there's a playoff, we can have that discussion. For now, the NCAA has denied that obvious solution for more than a century, so no matter who gets the trophy from the con men from the NCAA, your national champion is Utah.

How's that feel, Sooners? How's that taste, Gators? You like that, Longhorns? It's not a championship if you didn't earn it. Listen to your fans and wake up your AD and scream for them to set up a playoff. It's half past overdue.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/33834.

Comments (41)

Amen to that, DJ. The curr... (Below threshold)
Ray H.:

Amen to that, DJ. The current system doesn't work besides ensuring each bowl game can maximize it's profits.

To your point about Utah beating Michigan. I think the local high school team here in town could have beat Michigan this year, so wouldn't use that as part of my arguement.

I think something will happen in the next few yearz. Even though I don't think it should happen this way, I think there will be political pressures that will start to mount forcing a change.

But where is it written (or... (Below threshold)

But where is it written (or even understood) that win-loss record is the sole criteria for determining a national champion?

The standard from (I believe ) Day One of college football for determining the 'national champion', and I'm fine with leaving it that way, is letting the people with the best understanding of college football (writers and coaches) pick the team they feel is the best team in college football (and for all of the complaining over the BCS computer rankings, let's not forget that computers merely compute based on the criteria the program designers decide to use).

So if the experts want to discount Utah with its perfect record because they think either a one-loss Florida or Oklahoma team could mop the floor with the Utes, so be it.

I'm for a playoff.... (Below threshold)

I'm for a playoff.

That being said, it's not the NCAA's fault there are no playoffs. The individual colleges who ran FBS way back when it was called Division I are to blame for that.

The BCS was created with one thing in mind. To make money for the main "BCS conferences". If we want playoffs, then we're going to have to stop sending money to the advertisers. Screaming to the ADs will have no effect. Screaming to the presidents of the PAC 10 and the Big 10(11), and most importantly, Jim Delaney, will have about as little effect as well. They're the ones who leveraged the current system we have now, and their conferences are the ones who benefit the most from it.

Follow the money.

Oh, and one more thing. The current BCS contract with ESPN expires after 2015. We're stuck with this crap until at least then.

So Steve, should the NFL go... (Below threshold)
kbiel Author Profile Page:

So Steve, should the NFL go to a BCS/Bowl game system instead of having a post season? How about high school football? After all, there are a lot more AAAAA high school football teams in Texas than there are division I college teams. Don't the high school athletes deserve some kind of bowl system where more than one team can consider themselves the winner?

There are no official 'expe... (Below threshold)
DJ Drummond:

There are no official 'experts', Steve. Coaches and writers do not know every team of the 100+ that play in Division 1 (I'm old school I call it what it was for most of its history), and it's ridiculous to let PR and media decide a question best settled on the field. And there is a serious conflict-of-interest problem between the NCAA and the bowl directors.

As I wrote at the start, playoffs are used for every other sport, and every other category of football. There's just no honest reason not to have a playoff.

I can't wait for the folks ... (Below threshold)

I can't wait for the folks who don't like playoffs to dust off their tired, debunked arguments as well.

- "The regular season is diluted with a playoff."

Nope, sorry. The season would determine who gets into the playoff. If you think the regular season will get diluted, how do you explain a 6-6 Notre Dame team (now 7-6) matching up with a 7-6 Hawaii team (now 7-7) in the bowl season? Looks to me that their regular seasons didn't mean anything either.

- "There is always going to be controversy, it will be no different with a playoff."

Wrong again. The controversy now is who gets into the Championship Game. The controversy with a playoff is who gets the last seed. I'd much rather have the controversy there than with the game to determine a National Champion.

- "It'll unnecessarily extend the season."

Fine. Shorten the regular season. Everyone complains about cupcake games anyway. Each team plays every other team in the conference, conference champions get an automatic seed, then the rest is determined by the Top 25. Simple. If you still want to have the 6-6 team vs. 6-6 team in a meaningless bowl game in addition to the playoff...by all means. Knock yourself out.

As DJ said...every other sport has a playoff, including every other division you can think of in football. Should we go ahead and install the BCS-type system to every other sport and make them all be like figure skating? I think not.

First, who in their right m... (Below threshold)

First, who in their right mind ought to really care how college football decides a national champion? Or which team is #1? #2? $12? I sure enjoy watching football (pro more than college, but more because the names don't change with the regularity of college ball) but I'm sure not going to lose any sleep because 'my' team (or more accurately, as Seinfeld so nicely put it, my 'laundry') isn't ranked as high as some other team.

Second, it's a bunch of hooey to describe the current system as less than honest. The NCAA is well within their rights as a private organization to decide how the respective postseasons are conducted. The 'rules' are there for all to see from the beginning of every season in every sport. If the NCAA decides to maximize dollars (from all the silly fools whose lives seem to depend on whether their laundry wins on a given weekend) by staying with a system that doesn't have a playoff, so be it.

Third, no school is forced to stay with the NCAA and if membership wasn't a net positive for the schools, they could strike out on their own. That Utah doesn't take the high road and go on their own (or, alternatively, joining one of the 'power' conferences), instead preferring to stay in the NCAA and reap the rather nice benefits, offers us a new definition of chutzpah.

"First, who in their rig... (Below threshold)

"First, who in their right mind ought to really care how college football decides a national champion?"

So......the BCS committee is out of their minds for caring how CFB declares a National Champion?

"The NCAA is well within... (Below threshold)

"The NCAA is well within their rights as a private organization to decide how the respective postseasons are conducted."

The NCAA has absolutely zero involvement in the BCS, nor in determining the National Champion. It's the reason the BCS is in charge anyway.

Since your 2nd point is based on misinformation, this means your 3rd point is moot, although I'm not so sure Utah is complaining as much as those who would like to see a playoff system implemented. And Utah certainly understands the benefits of sticking with the NCAA.

I understand where you're coming from though.

Tom: allow me to clarify, w... (Below threshold)

Tom: allow me to clarify, who in their right mind - other than those whose paychecks depend on it - ought to care how college football decides a national champion?

Oh, boo hoo! I just can't ... (Below threshold)
Baron Von Ottomatic:

Oh, boo hoo! I just can't live with the indignity of more than one team claiming to be national champion!

Frankly, I think fans bitching about how their team got screwed by the system/polls three decades ago is part of what makes college football great.

Besides, the conferences aren't going to give up the money from conference championship games and bowl payouts. Why would the SEC or Big 12 forgo the ~$50 million in bowl money they'll be splitting among 12 teams for a kitty to be shared among 119 teams?

Yeah, we should scrap 100 years of bowl traditions for the NFL Lite. Because arguing over who's the best college football team is just so gauche.

"Tom: allow me to clarif... (Below threshold)

"Tom: allow me to clarify, who in their right mind - other than those whose paychecks depend on it - ought to care how college football decides a national champion?"

Let me point out the absurdity of that question by asking you a similar one.

Who in their right mind out to care how the United States determines who is elected into office as President of the United States and how it's done?

See what I mean?

Any sports fan cares, steve. It's the nature of sports. There's obviously enough interest and money being thrown into schools, tickets, clothing and other merchandise, not to mention vacation packages and bowl tickets that support the current system, to justify having a vested interest into making sure that there is a National Champion crowned. Therefore, there is a vested interest to anyone following the game, and to everyone else involved, to ensure college football uses the best system available to ensure fairness to all parties involved.

Unfortunately, the BCS isn't really interested in crowning a champion. The BCS is more interested in making money. I'd like to think they could try to do both.

Sigh. Should read:<p... (Below threshold)

Sigh. Should read:

Who in their right mind ought to care how the United States determines who is elected into office as President of the United States and how it's done?

"Frankly, I think fans b... (Below threshold)

"Frankly, I think fans bitching about how their team got screwed by the system/polls three decades ago is part of what makes college football great."

Frankly, I think that's what sucks about it. It leads to stupid arguments like, "SEC SPEEEEEEEED." Not to mention clueless ESPN reporters pontificating about who they think is number 1, and all they care about is whether a certain coach or president likes them, rather than reporting the news.

Sort of like what we have in politics now. Sports is supposed to be a safe haven from all that crap.

I'm not so sure if the stor... (Below threshold)
Bsix:

I'm not so sure if the story is about "UTAH" not winning a national championship as much as what denying Utah means.

If a team from a non-BSC can't win a national championship with their credentials...then no non-BCS team will ever win an national championship.

The presumption has always been that the perfect-record, non-BCS teams are Cinderellas. That is, teams from inferior conferences who piled up a high scoring perfect record playing non-entities.

Utah is the BCS buster who beat four ranked teams this season and has won two BCS bowl games in two tries. They have won their last EIGHT bowl games! They are not a Cinderella. Yet, they won't win the national championship.

If the likes of Utah can't win...what non-BCS conference team ever will? What would it take? Being undefeated for three or four seasons...and...winning 5-6 ranked teams per season...and...winning three BCS bowls in a row?

That is an impossible scenario. The national championship is owned by the teams from the BCS conferences.

<a href="http://sportsillus... (Below threshold)
Baron Von Ottomatic:
I think Bsix has it right, ... (Below threshold)
splint:

I think Bsix has it right, Utah HAS to play 8 conference games and won them all. Their 5 out-of-conference games were at Michigan, at Utah St (rivalry), Weber St (2nd in Big Sky Conference, DIV I-AA team), Oregon St (bowl game winner), and Alabama. Those out of conference games, with the exception of Weber St, aren't cupcakes. Throw in the fact that no powerhouse football team wants to schedule with Utah and basically the Utes put together the best season any non-BCS team can put together and they can't even sniff a championship. The fact that it's impossible for a team to win the championship is ridiculous.

Also the BCS uses strength ... (Below threshold)
Allen:

Also the BCS uses strength of conference to help decide who is #1, 2, etc. And that is IMO, wrong. The PAC 10 sent 5 teams to BCS bowl games, and won all five. Problem is, most PAC 10 teams play in the late afternoon or evening. Guess who is in bed at that time, it's all the east coast sports writers.

Right now I think Utah would give any team a hell of a fight, and probably would win. Same as UCS. Those two teams need to be considered contenders for #1, with Utah getting the nod as they are undefeated.

BVO:It's definitel... (Below threshold)

BVO:

It's definitely going to be a long time before the BCS gone, and playoffs are instituted. The BCS just signed a contract with ESPN, who'll take over in 2011. That contract doesn't expire until 2015. I expect it to be in place for some time after that.

However, I would also say that the BCS is simply a baby step towards the playoff system. The Plus One, which is a definite possibility, is yet another baby step towards it.

The slow, inevitable slide towards a playoff started way back in 1998. It'll be here someday.

splint:I wholehear... (Below threshold)

splint:

I wholeheartedly agree with you except for one small, minor detail. Michigan was a cupcake on Utah's schedule this year, as they finished the year 3-8.

Come to think of it...Michigan has been a cupcake on Ohio State's schedule for the last 8 years now! :-)

Tom, Yeah, true, ... (Below threshold)
splint:

Tom,

Yeah, true, Michigan was terrible this year but let's keep in mind that Utah went to Michigan for the first game of the season, before their epic awfulness was evident. Michigan was favored by 3 in that game. And note that it'll be a long time before you see Michigan football in Salt Lake City. My point is that Utah has to fight just to get good non-conference games and they'll never get a home and home from a major school. So, they basically take what they can get. This year they put together the best non-conference schedule a non-BCS team can hope for and they still are so far from a BCS championship it's silly.

The sad part is that a play... (Below threshold)
LenS:

The sad part is that a playoff would bring in way more money for everyone. You could still have bowl games for the non-playoff winning teams (generating revenue for the cities and ESPN). The bigger bowls could act as playoff rounds, which would clearly help the ratings for them in most cases. But you'd also get some huge rating nights in mid-January for the semifinals and championship games. And that would mean more money for some cities that already hosted a bowl game already. Look how much cash a Super Bowl is worth to the networks, NFL and host cities. A college Super Bowl would probably generate at least half that much revenue. The BCS conferences would get more than they do now even with sharing with the other conferences.

Utah should be ... (Below threshold)
clark smith:
Utah should be the national champion in NCAA Division 1 football this year. --DJ Drummond

Why is that claim ludicrous? Three words: "Strength of schedule."

'Nuff said.

Ok, one more thing; you honestly expect people to buy the notion that the Utes are even close to as good as the Sooners or Gators? You've got to be nuts.

The BCS is controlled by th... (Below threshold)
Stan25:

The BCS is controlled by the big liberal sports writers that went to the schools are listed. That is why Notre Dame is always in a bowl game, even when they are 0-11. On the other hand, Utah and the other schools in the Mountain West Conference, do not have any big time sports writers that are alumnus from these schools, thus are excluded from any chance of getting a national championship.

Another thing that keeps the playoff system that is all over the sports world are the bowls. These are huge bucks for the promoters and participants. If there was a playoff system, such has been suggested, the big time promoters would be out of business.

Clark,I don't thin... (Below threshold)
splint:

Clark,

I don't think the point is whether or not Utah should be champs (I personally don't think they're the best team) but the fact that basically they can't ever be champions because despite their perfect season they just won't ever get enough votes for the sole reason that they're the Utah Utes. That's a flawed system. They'll never be able to schedule 5 non-conference games that would be better than what they have this year.

Tom: yeah, our lives are eq... (Below threshold)
stevesturm:

Tom: yeah, our lives are equally affected by the President and the #1 team in college football.

Might I suggest a compromis... (Below threshold)
DodoDavid:

Might I suggest a compromise?

Simply refer to the winner of the Florida-Oklahoma game as being the BCS champion, not the NCAA champion.

There cannot be a NCAA champion until there is a NCAA playoff.

The bigger bowls c... (Below threshold)
Baron Von Ottomatic:
The bigger bowls could act as playoff rounds, which would clearly help the ratings for them in most cases.

Yeah, the Rose Bowl committee would go all out for two teams that want zero distractions after they fly in on a Thursday, have a walk-through at the stadium on Friday, then play Saturday and fly out Saturday night.

The major bowls would cease to exist except in name only. Then [email protected]^king parasites like Jerry Jones would hijack the games to sterile, regional settings. All in the name of money.

The ratings only matter to the network selling commercials during the games. ESPN just upped the ante from $82 million a year to $125 million a year for the BCS rights. The ratings obviously aren't a worry to the people writing the check.

On the up side we can look forward to more commercials extending games from the current three and a half plus hours to four hours plus.

"Tom: yeah, our lives ar... (Below threshold)

"Tom: yeah, our lives are equally affected by the President and the #1 team in college football."

Congratulations. You've missed my point completely. I can't tell if you did it on purpose or not.

At any rate, thank you Captain Obvious, for pointing that out.

By the way, steve, would yo... (Below threshold)

By the way, steve, would you like to respond to any other of the points in my comment at #12?

Here, let me help you:

Any sports fan cares, steve. It's the nature of sports. There's obviously enough interest and money being thrown into schools, tickets, clothing and other merchandise, not to mention vacation packages and bowl tickets that support the current system, to justify having a vested interest into making sure that there is a National Champion crowned. Therefore, there is a vested interest to anyone following the game, and to everyone else involved, to ensure college football uses the best system available to ensure fairness to all parties involved.

Unfortunately, the BCS isn't really interested in crowning a champion. The BCS is more interested in making money. I'd like to think they could try to do both.

Posted by clark smith | Jan... (Below threshold)
scrub_oak:

Posted by clark smith | January 7, 2009 6:26 PM |

Ok, one more thing; you honestly expect people to buy the notion that the Utes are even close to as good as the Sooners or Gators? You've got to be nuts.

That's funny, Clark. All the "pundits" said the same thing regarding the Crimson Tide before the Sugar Bowl. They had 'Bama up by 10 points. What a shock to the flawed BCS system to see a mid-major wreak havoc on the beloved SEC. The point is that there is no way to uncategorically crown a national champions without a playoff. With the BCS system all you get is the top team from a BCS conference, not the to

Posted by clark smith | Jan... (Below threshold)
scrub_oak:

Posted by clark smith | January 7, 2009 6:26 PM |

Ok, one more thing; you honestly expect people to buy the notion that the Utes are even close to as good as the Sooners or Gators? You've got to be nuts.

That's funny, Clark. All the "pundits" said the same thing regarding the Crimson Tide before the Sugar Bowl. They had 'Bama up by 10 points. What a shock to the flawed BCS system to see a mid-major wreak havoc on the beloved SEC. The point is that there is no way to uncategorically crown a national champions without a playoff. With the BCS system all you get is the top BCS team, not the top team in the NCAA.

It is inevitable that a pla... (Below threshold)
Alan Orfi:

It is inevitable that a playoff system will eventually be institued because of scenarios such as this one, but Utah simply did not play nearly as difficult a schedule as teams in the SEC that have a war on their hands each and every conference game. Compare Florida's schedule against Utah's and we can see the enormous disparity between the two teams' strength of schedules.

The bottom line is that if Utah played Florida at a neutral site, the line would favor the Gators by about nine. I know there are exceptions, most notably Alabama's failure to show up against Utah last week, but this line, which is comprised by the millions of folks who actually put money up to back their opinions, would probably verify.

Some responsibility is incumbent on teams like Utah to schedule tougher non-conference games, particularly when their own conferences are not top-caliber. Utah simply played too many easy games to be declared national champions.

The problem for you, Alan, ... (Below threshold)
DJ Drummond:

The problem for you, Alan, is tha you are assuming Florida would win. It's probable but frankly we do not know. Alabama was supposed to have no trouble with Utah, yet the loss was not only decisive, it was not as close as the score suggested. Utah kicked 'Bama's butt, and looked for real. In the end, what you do on the field is what matters, and ONLY Utah won all its games. Say what you want about anything else, Utah is the only team that cleared the table, and everything else is just trash talk. Florida or Oklahoma might be better than Utah, but they cannot rightly say they are the champions, because they have an inferior record. There needs to be a playoff, but for here and now, there's only one undefeated team, and it's an inconvenient one for the BCS con men.

The argument for or against... (Below threshold)

The argument for or against a playoff are old and well rehersed, but the basic fact doesn't change.

First, with 12 game regular seasons and no systematic scheduling there is really no way to determine the top 8 teams. We can pretend that we can take the 6 BSC conference champs, but other than the Pac-10 those conferences allow teams to avoid playing as many as 3 other teams within their own conference, so the winner could possibly not play anyone worthy and still win the conference. This has happened in the Big-10 where Wisconsin missed both Michigan and Ohio State and caught Penn State in a down season, so Wisconsin went undefeated and won the conference, but where they really the best?

And that doesn't even acknowledge the fact that the Big East is a weaker conference than the Mountain West Conference that Utah plays in.

But say they add the Mountain West and leave 1 spot open for arguments over that last at large spot. Does it go to the 11-1 Texas, or 12-1 Alabama this season? Trust me, whichever you choose fans of the other team would have been livid about being left out.

Worse, its a 12 game season. The NFL has 1/3 the teams and takes 4 more games before they pull out 12 teams to form their playoff group. They take 37% of their teams into the playoff. The biggest playoff proposed is 8 of the 119 current Div 1A teams. That's not exactly anywhere close to the number of any other playoff, including the other NCAA sports. Even Basketball (the usually cited example of how a college playoff can "work") is 64/320 or about 18%. Football would be 7%

So we are taking too small a sample for any playoff, with not enough games to understand who is good, and with a guaranteed argument over any at large spots, and scheduling that allows teams to pad their schedule to avoid real opponents, even within their conference. (Alabama avoided many of the better teams, beating up on 5 teams which were 3-5 or 2-6 within the SEC. Only Georgia was an upper tier opponent until they faced Florida in the "championship" game.)

Sorry, but I am absolutely against a playoff for the simple fact that despite all the rhetoric about one, I see no way a college football playoff will fix the problems everyone complains about. It will merely change the stage at which the arguments occur and accomplish nothing positive.

There's too much money at s... (Below threshold)

There's too much money at stake in the BCS and bowl games and Vegas betting parlors. The thing has to be controlled so The Right People profit.

Also a playoff would take power away from the sportswriters and pollsters and talking heads who feel it is their divine priviledge to decide the Nat'l Champ for us rubes.

There will never be a tournament or playoff to determine the NCAA 1A football National Champion.

Alan said: "Some responsibi... (Below threshold)
splint:

Alan said: "Some responsibility is incumbent on teams like Utah to schedule tougher non-conference games, particularly when their own conferences are not top-caliber."

Your missing the point, NO big BCS school wants to play someone like Utah because there's a chance they might lose and there's no big gain from winning. So schools like Utah can't get the top-notch conference games and if they by some miracle do get one, it's certainly not going to be a home and home. Utah's non-conference schedule this year is about as good as any non-BCS team can possible schedule without pure luck.

mvargus said: "I see no way a college football playoff will fix the problems everyone complains about. It will merely change the stage at which the arguments occur and accomplish nothing positive"

That's ridiculous, you're saying that an argument about who's number one is the same caliber as an argument as to who gets the final seed in a playoff. That's simply not true. People would quickly forget about who got left out of the 6 or 8 seed. You'd have several legitimate #1's going for the title. You'd see teams like Utah actually have a shot at a championship because as it is, teams like Utah will never get a shot a title game, never. Sure, arguments would continue but they'd be wholly diminished in their importance.

DJ,Utah's strength... (Below threshold)
Baron Von Ottomatic:

DJ,

Utah's strength of schedule was 61st vs. 2nd for OU and 5th for UF.

Throw out the I-AA teams all three played and half (6) of Utah's games were against teams with losing records vs. 4 for OU and 2 for UF.

Utah played six bowl teams vs. nine for OU and eleven for UF.

Boise State circa 2006 at 13-0 wasn't the best team in the country for the same reason Utah is not this season - they don't play the same caliber of opponent every week that an SEC or Big 12 team sees. You can't discount the level of competition.

I don't believe anyone can ... (Below threshold)
splint:

I don't believe anyone can make a iron clad argument that Utah is the best team out there. The elephant in the room is that nothing Utah can do will ever get them in the title game because 1. They'll never get enough votes simply because they're Utah. 2. Their conference works against them. 3. No big BCS school wants to schedule them because there's no incentive. If they beat them, great, but if they lose, there goes title hopes.

The argument isn't that Utah is the best team in the country, the argument is that teams like Utah won't ever even get a chance to sniff the title because it's impossibly stacked against them.

If this were 1984, Utah would be national champs. Anyone remember undefeated BYU versus a 6-5 Michigan?

To go from having a chance at the title, to absolutely no chance, is absurd.

Well, the line was 6 for Fl... (Below threshold)
Alan Orfi:

Well, the line was 6 for Florida and it verified as expected. The line against Utah would be around 9 or 10 and this would be the inevitable result. Of course, one can fantasize with all the cute "what ifs" in different scenarios, but the bottom line is Utah simply didn't play the same schedule and cannot possibly be considered anywhere close to the caliber of the Gators. Again, the line would be Gators by at least nine in a matchup against Utah on a neutral field... end of story. Florida is clearly the best team in the nation once again.

DJ, regarding your fears ab... (Below threshold)
LaMedusa:

DJ, regarding your fears about cancer. You are always in my prayers. May I ask you to take a leap of faith and review this information?
"Run from the cure..."
http://www.youtube.com/chrychek
Then take a further leap of faith...
http://www.nutsonline.com/seedsspices/hemp.html
Then maybe one more...is it any wonder it's "illegal" to manufacture a proven cure? Where would the pharmaceutical companies be if we didn't need them? Scroll down and you will find the recipe. Please ask God, then use His best answer:
http://www.greenpassion.org/f15/how-do-i-make-hemp-oil-6301/




Advertisements









rightads.gif

beltwaybloggers.gif

insiderslogo.jpg

mba_blue.gif

Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile

Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links

Credits

Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login



Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy