NPR has learned that Supreme Court Justice David Souter will retire at the end of the court's current term.
At 69, Souter is nowhere near the oldest member of the court, but he has made clear to friends for some time now that he wanted to leave Washington, a city he has never liked, and to return to his native New Hampshire.Now, according to reliable sources he has decided to take the plunge and has informed the White House of his decision.
Souter's retirement would give President Obama his first appointment to the high court, and most observers expect that he will appoint a woman.
So, who do you think Obama will nominate? There are many, many radical leftists out there that he could nominate. We already have a feel for what kind of judges he likes:
President Obama's first appellate nominee, Judge David Hamilton of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, has a long résumé of activism that suggests clearly where his "empathy" lies. His first job, fresh out of college, was as a fundraiser for the Philadelphia branch of ACORN, the "community-organizing" group that has been accused of serial election fraud. He later served as a board member, and vice president for litigation, of the Indiana ACLU. And it is very much ACORN/ACLU/Obama-style "empathy" on display in Hamilton's judicial opinions.






Comments (18)
Gird your loins, indeed. O... (Below threshold)1. Posted by Baron Von Ottomatic | April 30, 2009 10:18 PM | Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
Gird your loins, indeed. Oh the humanity!
1. Posted by Baron Von Ottomatic | April 30, 2009 10:18 PM |
Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
Posted on April 30, 2009 22:18
2. Posted by GarandFan | April 30, 2009 10:26 PM | Score: 3 (5 votes cast)
Anyone with an ACORN or ACLU background will be in the running. He might even nominate Bill Ayers.
2. Posted by GarandFan | April 30, 2009 10:26 PM |
Score: 3 (5 votes cast)
Posted on April 30, 2009 22:26
3. Posted by Unrepentant Democrat | April 30, 2009 10:28 PM | Score: -3 (5 votes cast)
So now we'll have some "radical" judges from the left to balance all those "radical" judges from the right appointed during the Bush Regime. Isn't our republic a wonderful thing?
3. Posted by Unrepentant Democrat | April 30, 2009 10:28 PM |
Score: -3 (5 votes cast)
Posted on April 30, 2009 22:28
4. Posted by kevino | April 30, 2009 10:41 PM | Score: 2 (4 votes cast)
Justice Souter was a disaster. It's one thing to be useless and brainless, but being useless, brainless, and oblivious is a terrible combination.
But elections have consequences, and now President Obama gets to pick another empty-headed statist utopian demigod to replace him - maybe a clone of Justice Ginsberg. Gag.
Note the Souter: When you retire, don't go back to New Hampshire. Many of us would appreciate it if you'd call someplace else "home". How about California?
4. Posted by kevino | April 30, 2009 10:41 PM |
Score: 2 (4 votes cast)
Posted on April 30, 2009 22:41
5. Posted by RicardoVerde | April 30, 2009 10:55 PM | Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Just when did reading the constitution and deciding it means what it says become radical?
5. Posted by RicardoVerde | April 30, 2009 10:55 PM |
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on April 30, 2009 22:55
6. Posted by retired military | April 30, 2009 10:58 PM | Score: -1 (1 votes cast)
My vote goes to Hillary for being the Supreme court justice.
6. Posted by retired military | April 30, 2009 10:58 PM |
Score: -1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on April 30, 2009 22:58
7. Posted by MichaelC | April 30, 2009 11:08 PM | Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
It is certainly clear that the second 100 days has gotten off to a bad start.
7. Posted by MichaelC | April 30, 2009 11:08 PM |
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on April 30, 2009 23:08
8. Posted by shirgall
| April 30, 2009 11:15 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
My bet: Judge Stephen Reinhardt
8. Posted by shirgall
| April 30, 2009 11:15 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 30, 2009 23:15
9. Posted by jp2 | April 30, 2009 11:35 PM | Score: -1 (1 votes cast)
Maybe an old, unqualified crony like Harriet Miers?
9. Posted by jp2 | April 30, 2009 11:35 PM |
Score: -1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on April 30, 2009 23:35
10. Posted by Jason | April 30, 2009 11:36 PM | Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Hold on to your copy of the Constitution people, it's gonna be a rough ride.
http://www.rightklik.net
10. Posted by Jason | April 30, 2009 11:36 PM |
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on April 30, 2009 23:36
11. Posted by Brett | May 1, 2009 12:07 AM | Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
That would have been a good way (from the President Pinhead perspective) to get rid of her for good, but I think the Secretary of State has pretty well done that already.
What's scary is that Bill Ayers *isn't* obviously out of the running.
It was a nice country, shame it's gone.
11. Posted by Brett | May 1, 2009 12:07 AM |
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on May 1, 2009 00:07
12. Posted by Justrand
| May 1, 2009 12:14 AM | Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
my bet: Fidel & Raul Castro
I know, I know...it's two people for one SCOTUS position and they're not citizens.
But hey, the Constitution is flexible, and this would be SO HIP...and SO Obama!!!!
12. Posted by Justrand
| May 1, 2009 12:14 AM |
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on May 1, 2009 00:14
13. Posted by 914 | May 1, 2009 12:20 AM | Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
The teleprompter is the most likely candidate..
13. Posted by 914 | May 1, 2009 12:20 AM |
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on May 1, 2009 00:20
14. Posted by Glenn Cassel AMH1(AW) USN Retired | May 1, 2009 12:25 AM | Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Well folks, we are in deep shit now. The obambozo gets to pick a supreme court justice and that pick will be somewhere to the left of Marx/Lenin/Engels/Alinsky.
14. Posted by Glenn Cassel AMH1(AW) USN Retired | May 1, 2009 12:25 AM |
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on May 1, 2009 00:25
15. Posted by bryanD | May 1, 2009 12:31 AM | Score: -2 (2 votes cast)
"So, who do you think Obama will nominate?"
http://images.google.com/images?q=harold%20hongju%20koh&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&hl=en&tab=wi
Just a guess.
15. Posted by bryanD | May 1, 2009 12:31 AM |
Score: -2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on May 1, 2009 00:31
16. Posted by Paul Hooson | May 1, 2009 12:33 AM | Score: -2 (2 votes cast)
This won't change the ideological make-up of the court. Conservatives will still hold a 5-4 majority to strike down the civil liberties of the average citizen and allow police overly broad powers.
16. Posted by Paul Hooson | May 1, 2009 12:33 AM |
Score: -2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on May 1, 2009 00:33
17. Posted by 914 | May 1, 2009 12:50 AM | Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
"Conservatives will still hold a 5-4 majority to strike down civil liberties and allow police overly broad powers."
Thats funny... Because thats what Obamas doing now. And He's not even using the courts.
17. Posted by 914 | May 1, 2009 12:50 AM |
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on May 1, 2009 00:50
18. Posted by Brett | May 1, 2009 12:57 AM | Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Which of your civil liberties have been struck down, and what overly broad police powers have you noted? Please, be specific, you seem to be an expert and I would like to learn something.
18. Posted by Brett | May 1, 2009 12:57 AM |
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on May 1, 2009 00:57