« Wizbang Weekend Caption Contest™ | Main | The Price Of the Emperor's New Clothes »

What 9/11 Means

Eight years ago, a team of terrorists killed three thousand innocent people for the advancement of an evil conspiracy. On the eighth anniversary of the most horrific act of evil deliberately perpetrated against the United States, the man in the White House is arguably the least ready in memory to effectively deal with an enemy who would, if they could, repeat that act on an even greater scale. The Congress of the United States has taken steps to disarm the men and women who protect the nation, while all but apologizing to the colleagues of the murderers for the U.S. getting in their way during the Bush Administration. And the people of America, once united in the face of the crisis, are divided and worn out by petty bickering and farcical mockeries of the duties and obligations of politicians in both major parties.

The nation is at war. It is an obscene fact that many Americans have managed to somehow forget that fact, to take for granted the efforts of our military to secure stable, free nations in Iraq and Afghanistan, or that the war still continues to this day, with all the stakes and risk that existed from the beginning for those who put nation first.

Terrorists are not 'criminals', they are not 'freedom-fighters', they are not 'misunderstood'. They do not have equal standing with the people they attack and kill. They do not have civil rights under any established law. They do not enjoy protection under the Geneva Convention. The Geneva convention was designed to protect combatants serving nations under certain rules of conduct, defined clearly and it's not difficult at all to confirm that people who do not belong to any national army or militia, who do not operate under military protocols, who commits atrocities not in isolated cases but as deliberate strategy, do not enjoy identification as 'combatants' in the sense of that treaty. Terrorists commonly enter foreign countries to perform their murders, so it is not correct to presume that they enjoy the protection of law that is accorded citizens. And the very nature of their conduct and strategy makes it necessary to treat terrorists on a simple means of identification and extermination. Find them and kill them, end of story. If there is doubt, investigate, but if there is no doubt, then there is no quarter to be given. Terrorism by its nature is anathema to humanity, and therefore such groups must be exterminated in total whenever and wherever they are found.

Before 9/11, it was politically sensitive to deal directly against terrorists. This can be seen in the policies of airlines, for example, which told their crews not to resist hijackers, but cooperate in order to save lives. The 9/11 attacks made it clear not only that the old system was not functional, but hopelessly naïve. On the international level, as well, the clear focus and imperatives of the Bush Administration after 9/11 made it clear that informal wink-and-nod arrangements between terrorist groups and certain national political groups would no longer be tolerated. A new U.S. doctrine took effect, which required President Bush to set aside all his original plans and policies in deference to his commitment to defend America from the threat of terrorism.

Before 9/11, religious thought regarding terrorists was sparse, especially among Muslims. Since Islam does not emphasize a separation of Church and State (quite the opposite, the very concept of Dar-al-Islam presumes mutual religious and military conquest of all the world), there was no overt debate on the morality of terrorist actions - those who opposed such actions thought them too incidental to address in the context of the faith as a whole, and those who supported such actions thought it unnecessary to risk dissension by discussing the religious context of the actions. A few Muslim sheiks had observed Koranic prohibitions against killing known innocents, especially women and children, that suicide was permissible in defense of innocents but not in murder of same, even if Dar-al-Harb. After 9/11, Muslims found themselves more compelled to examine their faith in the light of such actions, to decide not only whether terrorism should be part of their faith but also what their response as Muslims should be to terrorism acts by Muslim extremists. Non-Muslims found that they knew little of Islam, and often judged the entire faith by the actions of its most extreme. As with all faiths, prejudice and history have been difficult for people to overcome, both outside of and within the community of faith.

Prior to 9/11, there was a belief in some quarters of the world that supporting a terrorist group could advance a national strategy, and in so doing produce an economic benefit for their country or government. It is now more generally recognized that Terrorism is economic parasitism. By its nature, terrorist groups consume goods and destroy people and materials; it is literally impossible for terrorism to create gain or improve economic conditions. Economics is not, and has never been and never will be, a zero-sum game; any farmer can tell you that his neighbor's misfortune in no way helps his crops or livestock, and in many ways another's loss threatens his own well-being. That fact is now more apparent than ever before, giving regimes pause in considering the results of supporting such groups.

Before 9/11, there was some discussion that American military force was not up to the job in all places, that "lessons" in places like Mogadishu and Haiti showed the limits to U.S. power and influence, and various apologists for defeatism and appeasement pushed to scale back the size and mission of the American military, and to replace pro-American doctrines with policies of retreat and surrender, similar to the British pull-backs following World War 2, on the theory that U.S. interests represented imperial designs. This lie ironically found increased support in the fiction of the "peace dividend" after the fall of the Warsaw Pact, as if the ensuing chaos in a part of the world with more than 50,000 nuclear warheads was of no concern, or that other nations would not rush in to fill the void of power left with the fall of the Soviet Union, with attendant threat to American interests and citizens. While America power was clearly impressive in the first Gulf War of 1990-91, critics charged that things would be far different if the U.S. were committed to a long war, or tried to actually change the political structure of a major Mid-East country.

The long war in Iraq and Afghanistan proved the critics wrong again. The war has been difficult, costly, painful, and if Obama lacks the backbone to stay the course, great damage could still be done to American goals and interests in the region, but at present any objective analysis of the war would conclude that the governments of Iraq and Afghanistan are a vast improvement on their predecessors, in terms of freedom, economic opportunity, and security for their citizens and the region. Whether the war's cause was just or the results worth the cost may be debated, but the U.S. military clearly established an unsurpassed and undeniable ability to assert its power anywhere, anytime. The ramifications of this proof become obvious when the history of the region is examined.

In summary, 9/11 was a horrific atrocity, perpetrated by evil minds who have in some part come to a just yet terrible consequence, and in others deferred their reckoning to when they must stand before God. We have seen valor and heroism from many places, some unexpected, and loathsome hypocrisy and pusillanimity from others, especially those in privileged and public positions of celebrity and the avant-garde. We have seen the Mainstream Media sabotage its own credibility, and grass-roots bloggers rise to a degree of public acclaim and success. Our military has lost thousands of casualties in two campaigns, only to see the new President discount their sacrifice in hopes of gaining political coin for himself from our enemies. Both major political parties have demonstrated a grievous lack of commitment to fundamental American priorities and values, and few of the federal elected officials make themselves available to regular citizens, let alone accountable.

Yet for all of this, eight years after 9/11, our friends and enemies alike understand that there is a core of resolve in America unlike any other country, that there is a well of strength and purpose in this nation which no enemy may hope to overcome and no friend may fear will totally fail. We may be delayed, and we may take losses, but in the end, sooner or later we shall prevail. Not because Americans are better than other nations, but because this nation stands for the best of every nation, and while our methods may falter, our cause is just. No tyrant, no terrorist, no turncoat, no traducer shall win against us.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/36732.

Comments (20)

"I just got married and was... (Below threshold)
cullen:

"I just got married and was waking up to get off to college while finishing my last year in journalism. My wife called and said "turn on the television". I did, and the second plane had not hit yet. When I got to college, as I walked up to the television studio in the Basket Ball Arena my professor walked out, and with the sun reflecting off the domed arena a shadow threw his hands up and hollered, "Go home and turn on the television...This is your Pearl Harbor" That is why I built this site. Joe Burns was his name."

I found this on http://pledgeamerica.org/blog/ pretty cool opinions there...

Cullen

DJ, you are correct that th... (Below threshold)
JC Hammer:

DJ, you are correct that they have no rights. After all the info that can be pried out of them, they should be shot. And if President Bush would have said that to the American people right after 9-11, there wouldn't be this BS with all them.

over at BeJohnGalt we're do... (Below threshold)

over at BeJohnGalt we're doing a day long tribute to a few of the victims in association with "Project 2,996". theme is NEVER FORGET!

And my Cost of Freedom http://bejohngalt.com/2009/09/the-cost-of-freedom-22/
post today touches on the effort of some to "transform" 9/11 into a "National Day of Service".

I wish Obama would have the... (Below threshold)
WildWillie:

I wish Obama would have the fortitude and strength to stand up to an enemy without blinking. He can't even get two women journalists released.

I fear for my country now that Obama is persecuting and trying to prosecute the brave men and women who kept me and my family safe these past 8 years. Obama is an embarassment. ww

WilleI've noticed ... (Below threshold)
SAUD (happily):

Wille

I've noticed that in 2 posts about 9/11 you've managed to drag in Obama's name to score some cheap political point. Are you that full of hatred for the man? How does that fit in with your self-procalimed Christianity? You are indeed a despicable human being 9/11 memories to vent your own brand of hatred.

As usual, a thought provoking and well done post DJ.

Meant to say...."using 9/11... (Below threshold)
SAUD (happily):

Meant to say...."using 9/11"...... in the above comment.

"I've noticed that in 2 pos... (Below threshold)

"I've noticed that in 2 posts about 9/11 you've managed to drag in Obama's name to score some cheap political point." SALID

Is it your assertion that Obama DOES have "the fortitude and strength to stand up to an enemy without blinking"? If so, there are many of us who doubt that highly and, base that assessment upon his own words and actions.

Is it your assertion that Obama is NOT "persecuting and trying to prosecute the brave men and women (CIA) who kept me and my family safe these past 8 years."? If so, how do you explain the PURPOSE of prosecuting the CIA operatives?

I'd be more than happy to d... (Below threshold)
SAUD (happily):

I'd be more than happy to debated those points in another post.

SAUD, my comment on Obama r... (Below threshold)

SAUD, my comment on Obama relative to 9/11 is his, and the Dems, headlone rush to "transform" 9/11 into a "National Day of Service".

There are ~330 or so days of the year with NO significance tied to them. For that matter, there are several WITH significance that would have been excellent candidates for a "National Day of Service"...Martin Luther King Day, for one. And I mean that respectfully towards Dr. King. He DID embody "National Service", if only the Democrats would honor him by treating people as Dr. King wanted:
"I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character."

But instead, Barry Obama seeks to water down 9/11 into a happy face day!

REMEMBER 9/11...and NEVER forget what was done to us, who we lost...and who did it!

Piss on Obama's "National Day of Service". And if you're a fan of the "transformation" of the day, well you can crawl under the yellow stream too, Saud.

Piss on Obama's "Nationa... (Below threshold)
iwogisdead:

Piss on Obama's "National Day of Service".

Hear, hear.

It should be a national holiday, designated for prayer. Why it's not beats me.

"Piss on Obama's "National ... (Below threshold)
GarandFan:

"Piss on Obama's "National Day of Service"."

I agree.

Too bad Barry doesn't have the stones to suggest that Dec 7th be "a national day of service".
No guts Barry? How about Memorial Day? Better yet, how about Labor Day?

No, Barry picked 9/11 for a reason. Just as 'terrorist acts' are now considered "man made disasters" and the War on Terror is now "Overseas Contingency Operations".

Somewhere George Orwell is smiling down at Barry.

No, Barry picked 9/11 fo... (Below threshold)
iwogisdead:

No, Barry picked 9/11 for a reason.

Hmmmmm. Is bowing to King Abdullah related to the reason?

SAUD, as usual you offer yo... (Below threshold)
WildWillie:

SAUD, as usual you offer your cheap, pathetic namecalling. As a Christian, wouldn't I have to be truthful?

The difference in the last eight years in regards to fighting a war to what we have now is staggering. Now we have "man made events" instead of terrorist. We need a national day of service instead of mourning, reliving and not forgetting what a cruel hateful enemy we face. I am living in the real world. You should try it. ww

"Green block day" is what V... (Below threshold)
kathie:

"Green block day" is what Van Jones wanted to call it. Guess Obama thought it was a good idea. Service to your country and all.

Well said DJ.

I have waited quietly for t... (Below threshold)
Upset Old Guy:

I have waited quietly for the timeline of the events of 9/11 to pass.

Now I want to say how I am offended by the President's plan to create a National Day of Service to honor the people murdered on September 11, 2001.

It's not because it's Obama specifically. It's because we (collectively) are not ready for this. It's because this is not the way this should come to pass. It's because it is not the place of the President or the Congress to announce to the people of the United States that it is time for them to "move forward".

When it's time, as surely one day it will be, there will be people petitioning the government to create a national holiday on September 11. When it's time we will have seen major newspapers and broadcast commentators calling upon the government to create a national holiday on September 11. None of these things has happened because people are not ready for a holiday on September 11.

I think it unlikely people in my generation, or the generations older than me will ever be ready for there to be a holiday on September 11. The idea of retailers taking over the day is too offensive for us to consider.

It seems likely to me that there is some unstated reason why Obama is pushing this idea now. For some reason what we are now doing on September 11 does not fit with his needs/desires/plans. In this case it fall upon him to yield, the American people have not shown they are ready for this.

It will always be a day tha... (Below threshold)
kathie:

It will always be a day that you take off your hat and put it over your heart, bow your head and pray that it never happens again.

Well what? Are you trying t... (Below threshold)
BluesHarper:

Well what? Are you trying to piss me off - get me fired up?

Good post!

Spot on !!!

Thank you!

Take a look at Charlie Shhe... (Below threshold)
M Btok:

Take a look at Charlie Shhen's video for Barack Obama below:

We all know 911 was an iside job! It's as obvious as the nose on your face!
Al Qaeda is a close as your Government Rep in the USA!
Much of the administration that was in George Bush's Government is the same administration as is working in Obama's Government! The new Government is looking like the old Government!

Demand a thorough investigation! Don't leave a singke stone unturned! Use the best honest engineers and lawmen and scientests in the world!

This post has been linked f... (Below threshold)
UNRR:

This post has been linked for the HOT5 Daily 9/12/2009, at The Unreligious Right

To me, 9/11 will always be ... (Below threshold)
Madalyn:

To me, 9/11 will always be Patriot Day. Obama can call it what he likes, but since he refers to himself "The One" we all call him "Liar". It is more befitting.
Patriot Day to me is a tribute to those who died in the initial attacks, and the brave who died trying to save them. Obama is an American hater, and can't wait until our country is demolished. How the Dems can possibly defend his actions is beyond me. I was always under the impression that Congress, the Senate, the House, etc, and especially the president were supposed to be pro-America. Boy, have I been misguided.
GOD BLESS AMERICA
Madalyn




Advertisements









rightads.gif

beltwaybloggers.gif

insiderslogo.jpg

mba_blue.gif

Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile

Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links

Credits

Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login



Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy