« CNN's Helen Thomas to Obama: Admit Failure in Afghanistan | Main | Maureen Dowd decries Islam's misogyny »

New York Times disses ObamaCare

Say it ain't so:

AMERICANS seem to like the idea of broadening health insurance coverage, but they may not want to be forced to buy it. With health care costs high and rising, such government mandates would make many people worse off.

The proposals now before Congress would require just about everyone to buy health insurance or to get it through their employers -- which would generally result in lower wages. In other words, millions of people would be compelled to spend lots of money on something they previously did not want, at least not at prevailing prices.

Estimates of this burden vary, but for a family of four it could range up to $14,000 a year over the next decade, according to the Congressional Budget Office. Right now, many Americans take the gamble of going without insurance, just as many of us take our chances with how much we drive or how little we exercise.

The paradox is this: Reform advocates start with anecdotes about the underprivileged who are uninsured, then turn around and propose something that would hurt at least some members of that group.

...

The fiscal reality is that not all income groups can receive equal subsidies; as a family earns more, its subsidy would probably decrease, eventually falling to zero. But then we are taking money away from the poor as they climb into higher income categories. This is a disincentive to earn more, and the strength of the disincentive increases with our initial generosity. For many people, the health insurance aid would phase out when food stamps, housing vouchers and the earned income tax credit also end and the personal income tax kicks in.

This structure of incentives would likely discourage many parents from earning a better life for their children. Congress could tweak the subsidies so they don't phase out so quickly, but then we're back to very high fiscal costs and subsidies for many families in the higher income classes.

A surprising bit of truth telling coming from The Old Gray Lady... I now fully expect to see this news, and the AP piece linked to by Michael Laprarie, featured as updates to Sojourner's HealthCare Reform: Check the Facts page... after all, aren't the Religious Left all about doing what's moral and what's in the best interest of the poor?

Just sayin'.

Crossposted(*).


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/37139.

Comments (7)

Generally people are all fo... (Below threshold)
GarandFan:

Generally people are all for 'helping the poor' UNTIL that money starts coming out of their wallet. And especially when someone else is "deciding" how much money that will be.

I predict that tomorrow the... (Below threshold)

I predict that tomorrow the presses stop and the NYT goes out of business because all of its readers will have canceled their subscriptions over this.

Well ... one can have dreams.

If you've lost the NY Times... (Below threshold)
Tim:

If you've lost the NY Times...

"Tyler Cowen is a profes... (Below threshold)
Victory is Ours:

"Tyler Cowen is a professor of economics at George Mason University."

It's an op-ed piece written by an economics professor -- it isn't "The New York Times" dissing Obama. It's just one schmuck's opinion.

"New York Times disses ObamaCare" in your dreams only.

Vic

What's interesting about th... (Below threshold)
Scootsbe:

What's interesting about that article is that it is only healthcare that is seen as a disincentive to earn more. All the other "entitlements" of food stamps, housing vouchers and earned income tax credits are, apparently, not factors that might dissuade someone from earning more. And why not, those things don't cost anything for the recipient.

But make someone pay for their own insurance? I'll be passing up those opportunities to improve my lot in life. Give me a break.

"New York Times... (Below threshold)
914:

"New York Times disses ObamaCare"

Must not have any National Security Secrets to divulge in its myriad of mis-appropriations.


The NYTs losing readers and... (Below threshold)
Flu-Bird:

The NYTs losing readers and not even birds want it on the bottom of their cages anymore




Advertisements









rightads.gif

beltwaybloggers.gif

insiderslogo.jpg

mba_blue.gif

Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile

Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links

Credits

Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login



Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy