« Milbloggers Supporting C.J. Grisham | Main | Global Warming - The new Cold War? »

"if Israel is going to use force, it's going to have to be sooner rather than later"

John Bolton last night on Greta Van Susteren's On the Record:

VAN SUSTEREN: Well, it almost looks to me -- and I hate to be so grim about this -- but that it's a done deal on nuclear weapons for Iran for the simple reason that the country that is most interested in getting rid of those nuclear weapons capability is Israel. And now with this test today or test yesterday, is that if Israel attempts to take out those nuclear facilities, that Iran says that they will use these new missiles and go right back at Israel, and that just starts it -- I mean, I -- I don't even need to -- I mean, you (INAUDIBLE) imagination of what's going to happen at that point.

BOLTON: Well, but I think from the perspective of Israel looking at this test, if you don't like Iran having a ballistic missile capability that can deliver conventional weapons on targets in Israel, imagine how much worse is to have an Iran with nuclear weapons.

So I think this sharpens the decision point for the Israelis. I think it emphasizes that if they are going to use force against the Iran's nuclear program, the window of time that they have to do that is decreasing dramatically. So I think if Israel is going to use force, it's going to have to be sooner rather than later.

VAN SUSTEREN: All right, if nothing is done, then is -- it seems pretty plain Iran will have nuclear weapons, if nothing is done. If something is done -- and I mean, I guess we can increase sanctions. That's something else we could continue to try to do. But if something is done from military standpoint by Israel, that means that that engages everybody in the region, or certainly Iran. What do you foresee as sort of the likely -- how is this going to play out, in your mind?

BOLTON: I think the most likely outcome is that Iran gets nuclear weapons. I think that's the direction we've been pointed in not just in the Obama administration but in the Bush administration. These negotiations, which have now lasted close to seven years, have done nothing except given Iran seven more years to develop its weapons. And I think that is where we're going to end up.

And I think what's becoming more clear from the Obama administration is that people in the White House, people in the State Department are more and more reconciled to Iran having nuclear weapons. They don't like that, but they don't think it'll be the end of the world. They think Iran can be contained and deterred from using the weapons, as we contained and deterred the Soviet Union.

I happen to think that calculation is badly wrong, among other reasons because it doesn't stop with Iran. Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Turkey, others will get nuclear weapons if they see Iran with that capability. But I think underlying a lot of this is the view in the administration that we can live with an Iran with nuclear weapons. As I say, I think that's a mistake, but I think that's really where they're coming out, maybe not Secretary of State Clinton, but I think that's where the weight of opinion seems to be going, and that's bad news.

Crossposted(*).


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/37600.

Comments (5)

The NAtion of Israel is fin... (Below threshold)
OLDPUPPYMAX:

The NAtion of Israel is finished. It's just a matter of time until she has been overrun by Muslims and all Jewish occupants are murdered. Netanyahu sold out his own country, bending to the demands of our own Whitey House thug and Muslim-in-Chief. That effectively ended the continued existence of the Israeli people and nation. A traitor and sell-out from within. Sound familiar?

Benedictine Arnold = Dummyc... (Below threshold)
914:

Benedictine Arnold = Dummycrats.

I wouldn't count the Israel... (Below threshold)
GarandFan:

I wouldn't count the Israeli's out. However, EVERYONE in government thinks that the target will be the Iranian nuclear infrastructure.

Have any of these 'intellectuals' given thought to the idea that the target may well be the people at the head of the Iranian government?

I think it will be both Gar... (Below threshold)
G.:

I think it will be both GarandFan, at least that's what I would do If I were calling the shots in Israel, and very soon at that. The rest of the world could kiss my backside and have a piece of cake if they didn't like it on top of it. Because sooner or later Iran is going to use those weapons on some one or sell one to be used on someone.And gee-whiz, it doesn't take much to imagine who the other target would be.(For the dumbasses on the left...uh..yes, that would be us.) Then the proverbial escalation of sh*it hitting the fan at supersonic speed would be next.

They lack the capability to... (Below threshold)
SillyPuddy:

They lack the capability to do what some of you talk about effectively with any level of certainly about success. Yes they can pull off a strike, even a rather large strike, but all it will be is a shot across the blow and unless they get really lucky it will only slow the Iranian nuke progress while creating an expanded conventional proxy war that already exists. The time to act alone was years ago, to do it right they will need help either from the U.S. or very quietly from SA for a secret desert air stripe for at least their tankers to use, short of that the outcome will not be more then a 'message'.




Advertisements









rightads.gif

beltwaybloggers.gif

insiderslogo.jpg

mba_blue.gif

Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile

Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links

Credits

Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login



Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy