« Long Overdue Pushback Arrives in Senate | Main | "let's fight against capitalism and make it obey us" »

More True Colors - Subsidies that Vanish

Jay's post on the personal impact of the Senate's current health care reform proposals was an excellent example showing people what they could gain from the current proposals. Lots of people make around $54,000 a year and have a family of four. It's a great snapshot of the effect of subsidies. If you get free money from someone else, what's not to like?

In my mind, the real problem is not just that they are proposing taking from the rich to give to the poor. It's the incentives that this system sets up. Suppose you are a hard working employee in a stable job making $54,000 a year supporting your family of four, just like one in the example. You have a few more dollars in your pocket thanks to passage of this bill. According to the chart, reproduced here, you have either $9,000 or $4500 more in your pocket than if no bill had passed. Now suppose that you have an opportunity to earn more money, say another $30,000, by working harder and smarter, getting a raise, moving to a more challenging but rewarding position, having your spouse go back to work, or otherwise trying to improve your lot in life. What happens to your after tax, after subsidy, take home pay? From what I've heard about the health care bill, the subsidy decreases as your income goes up, disappearing by around $88,000 per year. Are you any better off than you were making $54,000? A little bit, but almost all your increase in earnings is absorbed by the decrease in subsidy, increase in tax rates, and other government takings. Why should you bother to work harder if you get no more money in your pocket? The answer is, for the majority of moderately hard working people, you won't. And American will become a nation of people who have no incentive to work harder. That is a very scary thing to contemplate.

Greg Mankiw recognized this issue two months ago:

Jim Capretta looks at the Baucus healthcare bill and concludes that, because the subsidies phase out as income rises, it imposes an effective marginal tax rate on income of about 30 percent for many families. Add that figure to the income tax, the payroll tax, and the phase-out of the EITC and "the effective, implicit tax rate for workers between 100 and 200 percent of the federal poverty line would quickly approach 70 percent -- not even counting food stamps and housing vouchers."

Indeed, Jim seems to understate matters, as he includes only the employee half of the payroll tax. Including both the employee and employer halves, as economic theory says is appropriate, appears to give a marginal tax rate closer to 80 percent. And, of course, many states impose income and sales taxes as well, and these would further raise the overall marginal tax rate.

Greg goes on to recognize that the marginal tax rate, if you consider the removal of subsidies a tax, reaches 75% on those making the common amount of $54,000 per year for a family of four. If they take advantage of very generous federal higher education subsidies available to them at this level of earnings, the rate can reach 100% with no trouble at all. We will create a permanent underclass of dependent citizens who fear working harder because any additional income will vanish into the air.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/37604.

Comments (7)

"We will create a permanent... (Below threshold)
GarandFan:

"We will create a permanent underclass of dependent citizens who fear working harder because any additional income will vanish into the air."

Which is exactly what the liberal "elites" want. And the stupid shits who support them can't see that those who GIVE can also TAKE AWAY.

"Why should you bother to w... (Below threshold)
astonerii:

"Why should you bother to work harder if you get no more money in your pocket? The answer is, for the majority of moderately hard working people, you won't."

It is a feature, not a flaw. It is part of socialism. Spread the wealth...

"Now suppose that you have ... (Below threshold)
John S:

"Now suppose that you have an opportunity to earn more money, say another $30,000, by working harder and smarter..."

Or say your salary just goes up by $30,000 after a couple of years of 50 percent a year inflation? You don't really think the Obama administration can continue to print up to $30 billion a day indefinitely, do you? Beware any millionaire tax. In 3 years we all will be millionaires and paying a 90 percent income tax rate.

"[America] will become a na... (Below threshold)

"[America] will become a nation of people who have no incentive to work harder. That is a very scary thing to contemplate."

Of course that's exactly what's happened in the socialist paradises of Europe, particularly France. Unemployment has been stuck at 10% for nearly two decades in many nations because the taxes, fees, and regulations associated with hiring new employees are very costly -- not to mention the steep penalties incurred if an employee is fired.

Because there are significant government subsidies available for retirees, the unemployed, or those who earn only a modest income, there are very few incentives for Europeans to work harder and earn more money.

The old saying goes, "Socialism is a great thing until you run out of other people's money." This is why these socialists states are slowly going broke, and why there is a growing demanding among Europeans for less government spending and lower taxes.

"We will create a permanent... (Below threshold)
Fran Mastropaolo:

"We will create a permanent underclass of dependent citizens who fear working harder because any additional income will vanish into the air."

-Who is John Galt?

"Now suppose that you ha... (Below threshold)
914:

"Now suppose that you have an opportunity to earn more money, say another $30,000, by working harder and smarter..."

Sorry, but no matter how I try, I just cant work any harder or get smarter? How does Barry manage to do it?

"Which is exactly what the liberal "elites" want. And the stupid shits who support them can't see that those who GIVE can also TAKE AWAY."

Succinct, yet let Me interject.

"And the stupid shits who support them can't see that those whom deem it necessary to giveth can as well taketh away.."

"Free Money!" has some damn... (Below threshold)
JLawson:

"Free Money!" has some damn nasty attachments to it, doesn't it? Of course, by the time you take the taxes, grab 25% for overhead, and then pass out the goodies - wouldn't it have been more effective to let the money STAY in the taxpayer's pocket in the first place?

It seems there's a point where it's emphatically NOT cost-effective to try and add functions that are duplicated elsewhere, and subsiziding them only makes things worse.

You ever get the feeling the folks in Washington don't have ANY idea what it's like in the real world?




Advertisements









rightads.gif

beltwaybloggers.gif

insiderslogo.jpg

mba_blue.gif

Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile

Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links

Credits

Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login



Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy