« Obama's not 'progressive' enough | Main | The White House's Mao-y Christmas »

This needs wider play

Steve Schippert of ThreatsWatch is now covering the INTERPOL Executive Order:

In light of what we know and can observe, it is our logical conclusion that President Obama's Executive Order amending President Ronald Reagans' 1983 EO 12425 and placing INTERPOL above the United States Constitution and beyond the legal reach of our own top law enforcement is a precursor to more damaging moves.

The pre-requisite conditions regarding the Iraq withdrawal and the Guantanamo Bay terrorist detention facility closure will continue their course. meanwhile, the next move from President Obama is likely an attempt to dissolve the agreements made between President Bush and other states preventing them from turning over American military forces to the ICC (via INTERPOL) for war crimes or any other prosecutions.

When the paths on the road map converge - Iraq withdrawal, Guantánamo closure, perceived American image improved internationally, and an empowered INTERPOL in the United States - it is probable that President Barack Obama will once again make America a signatory to the International Criminal Court. It will be a move that surrenders American sovereignty to an international body who's INTERPOL enforcement arm has already been elevated above the Constitution and American domestic law enforcement.

For an added and disturbing wrinkle, INTERPOL's central operations office in the United States is within our own Justice Department offices. They are American law enforcement officers working under the aegis of INTERPOL within our own Justice Department. That they now operate with full diplomatic immunity and with "inviolable archives" from within our own buildings should send red flags soaring into the clouds.

This is the disturbing context for President Obama's quiet release of an amended Executive Order 12425. American sovereignty hangs in the balance if these actions are not prevented through public outcry and political pressure. Some Americans are paying attention, as can be seen from some of the earliest recognitions of this troubling development here, here and here. But the discussion must extend well beyond the Internet and social media.

Pass this on. Have your circle of influence do the same.

This kind of radicalism must be stopped.

Crossposted(*).


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/37654.

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference This needs wider play:

» Big Dogs House linked with Obama Gives Away Just A Little More

Comments (6)

And how are you going to st... (Below threshold)

And how are you going to stop it? The public hates Obamacare and is unable to stop it, so why think that something like this, which most of the public knows little and cares less, is something that can be reversed?

Steve, I agree. However, wh... (Below threshold)
DaveD:

Steve, I agree. However, when the next presidential campaign rolls around Obama will have to face the results of his three years in office. This story may not burn up the media today, but it is the type of action that is nice to bring up in a debate. The query can be offered as a simple, easily understandable question and it would be interesting to see how Barry would answer. Bringing up something the majority of people may not have been aware of might have an impact compared to rehashing discussions on policy decisions that had already had wide exposure. If at the point of the next election he is vulnerable, this is a nice little item that would add to the doubts anyone would have that Barry is serving in the best interests of the United States.

"Stroke of the pen, law of ... (Below threshold)
Gmac:

"Stroke of the pen, law of the land..."

What a quick way of install... (Below threshold)

What a quick way of installing your own Secret Police, who can arrest you and prosecute you without worrying about that silly Constitution and those so-called "Rights" you thought were intrinsic.

Silly humans. Obama smash puny humans.

So these Executive Orders can be reversed by a new Executive, no? How fast can we get a new Chief Executive?

Oh. Well, that sucks.

Ah, well, I guess I'll see you in the concentration camps, guys. Too bad there's no America to flee to this time.


Can't we impeach the Marxis... (Below threshold)
Constitution First:

Can't we impeach the Marxist POS yet?

They can ALL be replaced VE... (Below threshold)
LUCIFER:

They can ALL be replaced VERY quickly.




Advertisements









rightads.gif

beltwaybloggers.gif

insiderslogo.jpg

mba_blue.gif

Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile

Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links

Credits

Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login



Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy