« UPDATE: Trials by Courts Martial Moved to Iraq | Main | Obama Proposes A Spending Freeze On What? »

Acclaimed super-genius laying the groundwork for unceremoneous exit

There are many ways to govern at the executive level. When we're talking about the POTUS, axioms about bucks stopping are the daily reality. Often times, you'll see a leader praised for ignoring widespread public sentiment and pressing forward in the face of growing protests. At least you'll see that leader praised by people who agree with the policy matter in question. President Bush and the utter and complete reversal of fortunes in Iraq are an obvious, glaring example.

I'd like to point out at this juncture that had W heeded public sentiment and a certain junior Senator from Illinois said junior Senator would have a whole heap more on his plate in the form of distracting-from-his-domestic-agenda war questions as Iraq continued its descent into a radically Islamisized Iranian proxy and breeding ground for terror. See there? I agreed with W's call at the time and now can point to our success in Iraq as Exhibit A when arguing the US foreign policy would be best served by doing the exact opposite of what Barack Obama suggests.

Kind of like betting against a team or horse that Al Bundy bets on.

Back in 2008 Candidate Obama promised voters the moon while presenting them a facade of post-partisan, post-racial harmony. President Obama rolled into the White House with - pending a recount in Minnesota which subsequently installed a 60th Democrat and begat the Franken Curse (Minnesota sports fans shall taste only disappointment for as long as Al Franken is in the Senate) - a filibuster-proof majority and his media fluffers proclaiming the death of Conservatism and a prolonged new Liberal Democratic progressive majority era. So Captain Bullshit ordered "Hard to port!" and set about the hard work of turning America into the socially-engineered redistributionist paradise he's always dreamed of but kept absolutely f$%^ing secret from voters because they wouldn't have put the "real" President Obama anywhere near the Oval Office in a million years.

What's the old gag? Folks, this is the greatest country in the world! And if you elect me president I promise to go to Washington and change everything about it!

Presented without any underlying context...

President Obama, buffeted by criticism of his massive health care reform bill and election setbacks, said today he remained determined to tackle health care and other big problems despite the political dangers to his presidency.

"I'd rather be a really good one-term president than a mediocre two-term president," he told ABC's "World News" anchor Diane Sawyer in an exclusive interview today.

This is the new, tough, Fightin' Obama. Doggone it, he's fighting...well, somebody who isn't focus-grouping well right now...for you. Throw in a dash of Principled Obama, too. Popularity be damned, he's going to show some backbone and cram this monstrous, unpopular health care bill down our throats.

If you're of a sort who wants Congress to pass a health care bill no matter how grotesquely it abducts, tortures, sodomizes, eviscerates, dismembers, burns, buries, and urinates on factual accounting principals and legislative transparency you're probably jumping out of your chair cheering on Obama as he sticks to his guns in the face of partisan opposition. As Dr. Egon Spengler so aptly put it, the door swings both ways.

But I come not today to speak of "policy" or "polls", I come to speak of "history". Specifically the historical possibility of being a "really good" one-term President. It seems to me that something pretty unusual would have to happen for a one-termer to be considered "really good". I'm not a presidential historian, but I'm hard pressed to recall a one-termer that could be considered even mediocre. Unless.

Historians (like most professional academics) are largely Liberal. Academia is even more p.c. than the media, right? So I'd wager that most "history" is popularly interpreted through a left-leaning lens. So through their eyes something that has squandered trillions and had disastrous effect like LBJ's "War on Poverty" is "significant" ergo "really good". Less a matter of effectiveness than magnitude. Medicare got seniors - the most reliable voters - on the gravy train. Now the big enchilada is almost within reach. The federal government assuming control of America's health care system and ensuring it's distributed fairly.

Think historians would consider that "really good"? Save a few years in the Illinois statehouse and 18 months in the US Senate professional academics are all Professor Obama has ever known. He's hiding behind the curtain of history. How can you rate a presidency until you've had time to examine it from afar? Snap judgments of George W. Bush aside, a presidency must be aged like fine wine before it is judged.

Rather than a mediocre two-term president is a nice backhanded slap too. You're thinking Bush but you're way off, Kimosabe - that jewel is aimed at Clinton. Obama figures he's the guy that's going to get the health care ball over the goal line where Clinton and Clinton failed. It's just that big of a deal to the left. As much as you want to keep our insurance if you like it, they want to control just exactly how much health care you're permitted purchase and at what price. Plus about 50% off the top, but that's a whole other column.

Barring a tragedy like JFK (and I'm not saying he was "really good") it's hard to see any one-termer being rated a "better" president than any two-termer. Now of course someone's out there right now talking about how honest to God Jimmy Carter ranks higher as a president than Andrew Jackson. Barring some seismic shift in the overall trajectory of the country - and socializing our medical system would qualify to those who write history - Barack would be considered a failed president. Frankly, I'm happy to see him take on an "It's better to burn out than fade away" mentality and supernova quickly. Dishonesty and duplicity will only get you so far when you're in a popularity contest. Once you start deliberately ignoring public opinion you'd better be sure you can actually win the battle.

W had the greatest fighting force in the history of mankind leading his surge in Iraq. Obama has Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Rahm Emanuel, and the Davids. Only history will tell us if they were both lame ducks when they dug in their heels.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/38031.

Comments (11)

This guy couldn't fight his... (Below threshold)
Jeff:

This guy couldn't fight his way out of a wet paper bag ...

He's the Milli Vanilli President ...

O-3bama soon to be O-4bama and O-5bama

"I'd rather be a really goo... (Below threshold)
GarandFan:

"I'd rather be a really good one-term president than a mediocre two-term president,"

And we're going to do our best to see that you get just that one term. As for 'really good one-term president' - isn't that an oxymoron? If your 'really good', wouldn't you get a 2nd term?

Really good one term Presid... (Below threshold)
Jeff Medcalf:

Really good one term President: Polk.

You could also argue Lincoln since he didn't serve his second term.

I thought our choices were ... (Below threshold)

I thought our choices were limited to a really lousy incompetent term or two really lousy incompetent terms in office. I guess it is progress on his narcissism. A month or so ago he was telling Oprah he deserved a B+ for his first year.

Another thought is he has always been a guy who was more concerned about his next position than actually fulfilling the requirements of his present position. Maybe he is just in a hurry to get to his next position - ex-president. Also, unlike his current job, ex-presidenting is something he is ready to go do.

As an expresident he can go... (Below threshold)
retired military:

As an expresident he can go around and give speeches with his teleprompters and tell everyone how the world would have been better if he had been reelected. I sincerely believe Hillary will be the dem nominee in 2012 and she will lose due to the minority vote feeling slighted.

Obama is the poster child for the antiquota and anti affirmative action crowd.

BTW where are Steve Green, ... (Below threshold)
retired military:

BTW where are Steve Green, and all the other lefties who normally carry Obama's water.

I think they are still writ... (Below threshold)
epador:

I think they are still writing Ellie letters.

"I'd rather be a really ... (Below threshold)
Speller:

"I'd rather be a really good one-term president than a mediocre two-term president."~Obama

I've got to hand it to him, he isn't mediocre.
Exceptionally bad, yes, mediocre, no.

Why?
Because he wants to lead America out of it's crises.

That's good right?
No, that's bad.

It's bad because the crises he wants to lead America out of are the health care crisis, the Climate crisis, and the economic crisis.

But the health care crisis and the Climate crisis aren't real.
They aren't crises.
America has good health care that the vast majority of citizens are happy with and the Climate crisis doesn't even exist.
The Climate crisis is a hoax.

The economic crisis IS real.
The problem is that Obama's perception of the economic crisis is false.

Obama doesn't think that the economic crisis is about the loss of jobs in America.
He thinks the economic crisis is about race and that some people, because of their race, aren't getting to take part in the American Dream and have the things that other Americans have, because of their race.

So to solve the economic crisis that Obama perceives, he is going to take the jobs and possessions that some Americans have worked for and give them to other Americans who haven't worked for those things.

Now fewer people get to have the American Dream, but come one come all and share in the American Nightmare.

The result is that people are afraid to invest in America because Obama has shown disdain for capital investment, increases the risk factor, and this will cause greater job loss and greater economic crisis.

No, Obama isn't mediocre at all.

"I'm good enough, I'm smart... (Below threshold)
bobdog:

"I'm good enough, I'm smart enough, and doggone it, people LIKE me."

Obama is the single, most d... (Below threshold)
olsoljer:

Obama is the single, most dangerous threat to this country I have ever seen, and he is the President. Talk about domestic enemies.

This President was the wors... (Below threshold)
Btok:

This President was the worst choice for America! He is just a puppet president with obligations to the Global Elite and soon they will kick him to the curb, saying bad, bad president low polls people don't like you and they will plant another joe boy puppet president maybe Republican! America is not run by president but by the off-shore foreign banks eg. World Central Bank in England, owned by for one Rothschild, by Edmund de Rothschild! If we keep allowing these Globalists to chart their course the next president won't be any better than either Bush or Obama, whether he be green, orange pink, purple or red with white polka-dots he or she would be a puppet for the banksters! Look at the fleecing Iceland is getting from the International Monetary Fund! At least there the citizens are standing up to these world mafia thugs!
What about Canada? Are things on the level there? Or are Elitists melting into your mosaic society and gathering the reins of control? Better check the foundation to see if there are termites in the wood!




Advertisements









rightads.gif

beltwaybloggers.gif

insiderslogo.jpg

mba_blue.gif

Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile

Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links

Credits

Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login



Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy