« Giving Obama Points For Trying | Main | Point Blank: Is Obama Stupid? »

Jay Cost on the House and Health Care

My pessimism meter is pretty much pegged on the health care issue at them moment. While I will readily agree that it is political suicide for many representatives to vote for this bill given the obvious public opposition, I fear they will do so anyway. I was slightly encouraged, however, by a post by Jay Cost over at the Horse Race Blog. Cost breaks down the "undecideds" in the House on the health care bill with his normal interesting analysis. He starts with this:

How many members should we expect to take a hard-and-fast stand on a bill that has not yet been finalized? If I were a Democratic legislator - I would say something like what (at least a few of) these members said: "I believe in quality, affordable health care for all. When there is a final package, I will read it and make a decision." Otherwise, I would look awfully prejudiced. The more interesting story, in my judgment, is that several have said they were already decided against the bill.

I'm compiling an alternative count that is based upon public statements and a few key factors, placing members into several categories - all of which allow for the possibility of a nay-to-yea flip. Even if a member comes out and says no, he/she might still change his/her mind. Marjorie Margolies-Mezvinsky did exactly that in 1993 on the Clinton budget vote.

The rest of his post breaks down people into different categories such as "very hard to persuade" and "persuadable". It is too long to quote here but if you are into that kind of analysis, I highly recommend reading his full post (linked above).

The one thing I think is missing from the analysis is outright vote buying. While the version the House would be voting on can't be modified directly, I wouldn't be surprised to hear about all sorts of "guarantees" of federal monies to specific districts in exchange for support of the bill. Unethical? Yes. But if anything has been made clear to me over the past year it is that concerns of ethics hold no sway over the actions of Pelosi and Reid.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/38406.

Comments (2)

It's already been shown tha... (Below threshold)
GarandFan:

It's already been shown that "ethics" and this Congress have nothing in common. Nancy's problem is that if the Dems succeed in passing this bill, she WON'T be Speaker in 2011. And if she's not Speaker, she sure as hell won't be minority leader. Promises hold value only when their cashed in.

Perhaps if we offered subtl... (Below threshold)

Perhaps if we offered subtle hints. Having voted for the health care bill once, they are unlikely to be returning to Washington next year. Voting for the health care bill a second time could make returning home problematic as well.




Advertisements









rightads.gif

beltwaybloggers.gif

insiderslogo.jpg

mba_blue.gif

Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile

Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links

Credits

Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login



Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy