« Wizbang Weekend Caption Contest™ | Main | President Obama Kills Immigration Reform »

From His Lips To Our Ears

Poor, poor Joe Biden. He thought he had the title of "Chief Gaffer" sewn up, with his seemingly-endless stream of stupid that comes out of his mouth. But now it seems that he's being pushed aside -- by President Obama.

But that's because Joe forgot that in politics, "gaffe" doesn't simply mean "saying something dumb." In politics, there's a special meaning -- "when a politician inadvertently says something far more honest than intended.

And President Obama, especially when he goes off-TelePrompTer, has a remarkable habit of telling us not what he thinks we want to hear, but what he really thinks.

For example, his remarks about Wall Street:

We're not, we're not trying to push financial reform because we begrudge success that's fairly earned. I mean, I do think at a certain point you've made enough money. But, you know, part of the American way is, you know, you can just keep on making it if you're providing a good product or providing good service. We don't want people to stop, ah, fulfilling the core responsibilities of the financial system to help grow our economy.

This has been spun by his apologists into how he meant that it's bad to earn money dishonestly, that you should try to play fair, that you shouldn't be deceptive and exploit those who have trusted you to be honest and honorable. But that simply isn't what he said.

From my reading, those who work in the financial business are entitled to do well -- but up to a certain point. Once they've made however much President Obama thinks is "enough," they simply shouldn't make any more.

Further, the purpose of the whole financial field is not to make money, to benefit themselves, to be as successful as they can. You know, like every other business in the country. No, the financial industry has a special responsibility: to make the overall economy better. Even, apparently, if it comes at their own detriment.

It's an unpleasant fact of life, but there are businesses that do better when the economy tanks. Pawn shops, for one. Debt collectors and repo men. Auctioneers. Are they bad people because they gain when others lose?

In the financial world, most of them prefer a healthy economy. It's generally a good thing for them -- a growing economy presents more opportunities.

But they can't just count on that happening, even though they can sway the general direction of the economy to some extent. Sometimes things go bad. And they've got to be prepared for those eventualities.

For financiers, it's even worse. They are, by and large, publicly traded companies. And they have a legal and moral obligation to do well by their owners and investors. If they are presented with a choice between making money and helping the general economy, they damned well better not choose to lose their company's money for the "common good." They can be sued and fired for such actions -- and have been.

But back to Obama. He seems to believe -- as shown by this off-the-cuff remark -- that there ought to be limits on success. That after a certain level of achievement, individuals ought to set aside further personal gain and instead devote themselves to the common good.

I happen to share that belief.

Where I differ with him, though, are in the details. I think that how they advance "the common good" ought to be left up to the individuals involved -- after all, it's their money and their efforts. If they think that the public is best served by them continuing to make big bucks and living lavish lifestyles, so be it. They gotta pay someone for all that champagne and fine clothes and fast cars and fancy toys, which means that money goes right back into the economy.

But the one thing about Obama's "made enough money" remark that struck me was its familiarity. It was not in his prepared remarks, but it was entirely consistent with another off-the-TelePrompTer moment from the campaign, where once before Obama had let his mask slip and revealed more about his true beliefs than he intended: during the infamous "Joe The Plumber" incident.

Remember these words?

"My attitude is that if the economy's good for folks from the bottom up, it's gonna be good for everybody. If you've got a plumbing business, you're gonna be better off if you're gonna be better off if you've got a whole bunch of customers who can afford to hire you, and right now everybody's so pinched that business is bad for everybody and I think when you spread the wealth around, it's good for everybody."

Again, I agree absolutely with Obama's statement. It's dead-on accurate. As President Kennedy once said, "a rising tide raises all boats."

Where I differ with him is how that principle should be applied. I think that the most ethical way to "spread the wealth around" is to allow people to keep as much of their own money as possible, and let them distribute it as they see fit. Even if they piss it away, as so many of us would, that's still pumped back in the economy -- if I decide to buy a gold toilet seat lined with mink, that's incredibly stupid. But I have to pay someone to make it, and that takes a hunk of money out of my idiotic hands and into the hands of people smart enough to give the customer what he wants.

Obama, though, seems to think that the best arbiter on how to spend our money is the federal government. He believes that politicians and bureaucrats are better equipped to disburse whatever money we have that goes beyond "enough" by their standards than we are. After, of course, they take their cut as "overhead."

There are circumstances that they're right. There are things that really ought to get funded that we can't depend upon the general public to support adequately. National defense, for one. Certain sections of infrastructure, for another. Research into areas that don't lend themselves to immediate commercial exploitation.

But that only covers a small fraction of federal spending. And there's one point that is so blindingly obvious that it's often overlooked:

The federal government has no money of its own. Every single penny that it has, is money it has taken from us.

President Obama seems to believe that the best way to improve the economy is for the federal government to decide who has "too much" money (based on factors such as how much they have, how they acquired it, and how they intend to spend it), take what the government deems as "excessive" as to how much they "need," take their cut, and then distribute it in ways that they think "fairest." And that is entirely consistent with his words and deeds.

I disagree.

I've mentioned before that I have a pretty wretched gene pool. I've got several medical issues that are related to bad genes. I think another sign of that is that I lack an "envy" gene. I don't resent other people's success. I don't get angry when I see others prosper while I struggle. And I don't want the government to "help" me or others by taking things from people who've done well.

Of all the pithy quotes I've heard or read over the years, the one that is almost always at the forefront of my mind is one from Gerald Ford:

"A government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take from you everything you have."

That truism has been proven over and over again, around the world. It seems that President Obama has never heard it.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/38919.

Comments (16)

Obviously he doesn't think ... (Below threshold)
hermie:

Obviously he doesn't think HE earned enough money.

Does he think LeBron James made enough? Or Michael Moore? How about a customer service rep in a plumbing supply company? How much does Obama believe is enough for that person to earn?

From joes mouth to Obamas e... (Below threshold)
914:

From joes mouth to Obamas ears is a dead zone.

Hey I am all for grabbing h... (Below threshold)
mpw280:

Hey I am all for grabbing his 5 mil and Oprahs 100 mil as they have earned enough for a lifetime already and anything more should be confiscated. Hell lets go after any liberal/democrat who earns more than congressmen and take their money back down that level. If democrats don't think we pay enough taxes, let them lead by example. I also believe that it should apply to global warming people, take their private jets and expansive homes and bring them down to the level that they want us to all live in. mpw

Does that include Oprah, So... (Below threshold)
mag:

Does that include Oprah, Soros, and liberal hollywood people????

I've got dibs on Soros' mon... (Below threshold)

I've got dibs on Soros' money. I keep sending him e-mails from Nigeria but he hasn't replied yet.

"I've got dibs on Soros'... (Below threshold)
914:

"I've got dibs on Soros' money. I keep sending him e-mails from Nigeria but he hasn't replied yet."


Try sending them from Kenya instead

I wonder what John Kerry's ... (Below threshold)
Hank:

I wonder what John Kerry's thoughts are, on this.

Has anyone asked Nancy Pelo... (Below threshold)
GarandFan:

Has anyone asked Nancy Pelosi, Diane Feinstein, or Maxine Waters how they fell about "earning too much money"? Seeing as all of them qualify as "millionaires", just curious.

"Has anyone asked Nancy ... (Below threshold)
914:

"Has anyone asked Nancy Pelosi, Diane Feinstein, or Maxine Waters how they fell about "earning too much money"? Seeing as all of them qualify as "millionaires", just curious."


They dont have to answer that cause they did not earn it!! Just like Lurch the golddigger.

I gotta tell ya, everytime ... (Below threshold)
Oyster:

I gotta tell ya, everytime Obama pops off with a new one it's a pleasure to watch my formerly don't-care-about-politics husband blow a gasket. He said he's beginning to see that I'm not the kook he thought I was. In the past he would always say, "Yes, dear," just to humor me when I ranted. Now every time he rants to me I call him a right-wing nut-job.

It's fun!

Oyster, wait til he finds o... (Below threshold)
Hank:

Oyster, wait til he finds out he's a racist.

This is such a love-hate re... (Below threshold)
DaveD:

This is such a love-hate relationship for Barry - being forced to work with a TeleprompTer that is politically more moderate than he.

..."you can just keep on ma... (Below threshold)
Jer:

..."you can just keep on making [money] if you're providing a good product or providing good service."

Congress: bad product, poor service.

"..."you can just keep o... (Below threshold)
914:

"..."you can just keep on making [money] if you're providing a good product or providing good service."

Congress: bad product, poor service."

Barry = bad product, poor service, big ego, fatally flawed, an engineer of our destruction, a lousy bowler, an under overachiever, gets paid for nothing, would be a good reason to start drinking if I already did not, is a pox on all of us, cant unite, cant add, cant create, cant associate with taxpayers, cant stop the Tea Parties, rushes to the defense of foreign enemies, stabs us in the back repeatedly, thinks hes smart, he is not, would be whipped by Michell in arm wresting, cant play ball (I'd school his ass), cant work, cant fake a recovery, cant pull out wins in Nov, matter of fact, cant do one damn thing right accept go away.

Hey this is good news.... (Below threshold)
hcddbz:

Hey this is good news.

"There will be time for them to make profits, and there will be time for them to get bonuses. Now is not that time. And that's a message that I intend to send directly to them, I expect Secretary Geithner to send to them,"

I guess Tim has told people that they can make a profit again.

You must remember BHO father thought we should get taxed at 100% for anyone earning over 1 million Nigerian.

I wonder why no one ever says At some point government confiscates too much of countries wealth?

I want to know what cave pe... (Below threshold)
Ryan:

I want to know what cave people have been living in where they believe money passing through the hands of a politician makes it MORE moral?




Advertisements









rightads.gif

beltwaybloggers.gif

insiderslogo.jpg

mba_blue.gif

Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile

Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links

Credits

Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login



Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy