So sayeth Barack Obama. Those poignant words were uttered on ABC's This Week two weeks after Hurricane Katrina struck the Gulf coast. Pretty good sauce for the gander in light of the current administration's refusal to suspend regulatory burdens and enlist foreign assistance after the Horizon rig blew up and left oil spewing into the Gulf of Mexico. Now let's consider the context:
"Whoever was in charge of planning was so detached from the realities of inner city life in New Orleans...that they couldn't conceive of the notion that they couldn't load up their SUV's, put $100 dollars worth of gas in there, put some sparkling water and drive off to a hotel and check in with a credit card," Obama said.I guess the insinuation is that George Bush should have personally seen to it that the black residents of New Orleans who ended up stranded after Katrina hit had been evacuated. And he didn't, in large part, because he was detached from the reality of life in inner city New Orleans.There seemed to be a sense that this other America was somehow not on people's radar screen. And that, I think, does have to do with historic indifference on the part of government to the plight of those who are historically African-American."
Things might have turned out much differently if Bush could have conceived that inner city residents couldn't just pack up and leave like suburban residents. Such indifference to the plight of those who are historically African-American! Unlike New Orleans' African-American mayor Ray Nagin, who issued a mandatory evacuation order less than 24 hours before the storm struck. And left hundreds of buses sitting parked to be flooded along with the rest of the city. Or Kathleen Blanco, who asked Bush to declare a federal state of emergency in Louisiana less than 48 hours before the storm struck.
I'm no expert in disaster response, so maybe less than two days is a realistic amount of time to expect the federal government to execute a full-scale evacuation of the entire city of New Orleans. Or maybe the problem is a culture of dependency that requires an army of federal agents removing residents at gunpoint to enforce a mandatory evacuation. Or maybe, considering the magnitude of the disaster, a chaotic and disjointed response is the only possible outcome.
Here's a timeline courtesy of Think Progress. These words from President Bush on September 13, the day after Obama's words above, caught my eye:
"Katrina exposed serious problems in our response capability at all levels of government," Mr. Bush said. "And to the extent that the federal government didn't fully do its job right, I take responsibility."
I wonder if Obama will make a similar declaration tomorrow night when he speaks to the nation about the on-going oil spill. Especially since responding to off-shore drilling disasters is entirely the responsibility of the federal government. Somehow I get the feeling Mr. "I Can't Suck It Up With A Straw" has suddenly found a new respect for the limits of presidential power when responding to emergencies.
Besides, this issue is different because of the complexities and number of agencies involved. Just ask Senator James Clyburn:
I really believe that when you have so many entities involved in this, then it becomes a problem of trying to get everybody on to the same page and focus on to a process that seems sometimes to be contradictory if you go from one agency to another.The "We didn't understand the extent" defense didn't work well for Bush in the aftermath of Katrina, is it supposed to be a convincing argument now? Federal emergencies are by their very nature events of such a magnitude that multiple agencies - local, state, and federal - are involved in the response. Why is it with a Democrat in the White House "we miscalculated the impact and coordinating the response is difficult and convoluted" suddenly becomes a viable excuse?If this were only one or two agencies involved in this process, that would be one thing. But there must be 12, 14, almost 20 entities involved, and so managing that gets clumsy sometimes. But I do believe that the president is much more hands-on at this point than he was at the beginning.
I don't think any of us knew the real extent of the spill, because we were getting information from BP that now we find out was not quite true, in fact, was far from the truth.
Passive indifference is as bad as active malice. I eagerly await Think Progress' timeline of the Horizon spill to help us determine if Obama was acting maliciously or incompetently. Either way, we can be reasonably sure it will have no record of Obama saying, "To the extent that the federal government didn't fully do its job right, I take responsibility."



Comments (14)
I believe Obama will defini... (Below threshold)1. Posted by JLawson | June 14, 2010 10:57 PM | Score: 5 (5 votes cast)
I believe Obama will definitely be a historical President - one that will be studied for decades to come. He will not be a virtual non-entity like some of our past Presidents - a name on the list with little attached to it, either good or bad...
But by the time he hits 60 he may well want to be.
1. Posted by JLawson | June 14, 2010 10:57 PM |
Score: 5 (5 votes cast)
Posted on June 14, 2010 22:57
2. Posted by Jay Guevara | June 14, 2010 11:07 PM | Score: 10 (10 votes cast)
God, I'm sick of hearing about how something or other affects blacks specifically. How about considering how it affects Americans, generally speaking?
2. Posted by Jay Guevara | June 14, 2010 11:07 PM |
Score: 10 (10 votes cast)
Posted on June 14, 2010 23:07
3. Posted by GarandFan | June 14, 2010 11:14 PM | Score: 9 (9 votes cast)
"...the problem is a culture of dependency...."
Nailed it. The Dem's got just what they wanted. A populace that needs to be told to what to do. Couple it with an ineffective mayor and governor, stir well, and you've got a great recipe for disaster.
Now compare that with the flooding going on in Tennessee. I don't hear major screams of despair and "where's the government?".
3. Posted by GarandFan | June 14, 2010 11:14 PM |
Score: 9 (9 votes cast)
Posted on June 14, 2010 23:14
4. Posted by 914 | June 14, 2010 11:33 PM | Score: 5 (5 votes cast)
His fro grows "whiter" ( I know "racist" ) with every panicked see im really here but dont give a shit blow fest he gives lately.
4. Posted by 914 | June 14, 2010 11:33 PM |
Score: 5 (5 votes cast)
Posted on June 14, 2010 23:33
5. Posted by Zelsdorf Ragshaft III | June 14, 2010 11:37 PM | Score: 7 (7 votes cast)
What if the idea was to set up a scenario where something that could happen if you did not take certain precautions, did happen. Then rather than do the obvious thing and act both quickly and productively to curb the damage the mentioned scenario caused but instead allowed the incident grow into a magnitude that it becomes a disaster which creats a crisis to allow the passage of a energy bill which if passed will so damage our economy that it might fail allowing the failure of our current system and be replaced with something far, far more sinister.
5. Posted by Zelsdorf Ragshaft III | June 14, 2010 11:37 PM |
Score: 7 (7 votes cast)
Posted on June 14, 2010 23:37
6. Posted by 914 | June 14, 2010 11:39 PM | Score: 4 (4 votes cast)
By august Barrys hair is gonna look like Moses in the 10 commandments parting the sea.
Come to think of it, maybe it would be easier to plug that damned hole if he did.
6. Posted by 914 | June 14, 2010 11:39 PM |
Score: 4 (4 votes cast)
Posted on June 14, 2010 23:39
7. Posted by Gmac | June 14, 2010 11:54 PM | Score: 7 (7 votes cast)
"I wonder if Obama will make a similar declaration tomorrow night when he speaks to the nation about the on-going oil spill."
It would be a first...I'll bet he doesn't and sticks it to BP, again.
Z III is close to whats going on in the House and Senate right now. IMHO the (P)resident can't wait to shackle the public with higher taxes to pay for his rainbows and unicorn farts that will drive the economic engine of this country when he replaces petroleum.
7. Posted by Gmac | June 14, 2010 11:54 PM |
Score: 7 (7 votes cast)
Posted on June 14, 2010 23:54
8. Posted by 914 | June 14, 2010 11:56 PM | Score: 5 (5 votes cast)
Barry is neither malicious or passively indifferent. He just wants to vote 'present" as President and get credit without doing the job.
8. Posted by 914 | June 14, 2010 11:56 PM |
Score: 5 (5 votes cast)
Posted on June 14, 2010 23:56
9. Posted by epador | June 15, 2010 12:26 AM | Score: 4 (4 votes cast)
FORE!
9. Posted by epador | June 15, 2010 12:26 AM |
Score: 4 (4 votes cast)
Posted on June 15, 2010 00:26
10. Posted by SillyPuddy | June 15, 2010 12:32 AM | Score: 7 (7 votes cast)
"I don't think any of us knew the real extent of the spill, because we were getting information from BP that now we find out was not quite true, in fact, was far from the truth."
---
Oh jesus H... What? Are they now going to start in with "BP lied the gulf died"?
Even assuming the intelligence the administration gathered turned out to be wrong it's not an excuse, least according to the left's playbook for the last administration, according to them it's a lie.
10. Posted by SillyPuddy | June 15, 2010 12:32 AM |
Score: 7 (7 votes cast)
Posted on June 15, 2010 00:32
11. Posted by SillyPuddy | June 15, 2010 12:36 AM | Score: 6 (6 votes cast)
Besides he doesn't really care about the disaster, he just want's the issue to use to ram whatever else though he thinks he can get, using whatever means necessary prior to January. Cap&Tax (or some variation) just like HC here we come.
11. Posted by SillyPuddy | June 15, 2010 12:36 AM |
Score: 6 (6 votes cast)
Posted on June 15, 2010 00:36
12. Posted by retired military | June 15, 2010 6:44 AM | Score: 6 (6 votes cast)
Here Lee Ward let me save you the trouble.
Republicans were for white haired Presidents before a black man became President.
Also we know that 914 and Jay have pegged the top of your racist meter.
12. Posted by retired military | June 15, 2010 6:44 AM |
Score: 6 (6 votes cast)
Posted on June 15, 2010 06:44
13. Posted by OLDPUPPYMAX | June 15, 2010 11:13 AM | Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Hussein is an EXPERT in "active malice."
13. Posted by OLDPUPPYMAX | June 15, 2010 11:13 AM |
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on June 15, 2010 11:13
14. Posted by Brian Richard Allen | June 15, 2010 11:04 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
So.
We observe and are duly alarmed to note that as a responder to a leaky pipe, product of some (American contractor provided) piss-poor Pommy plumbing, 0zero is a sail-eared simpleton, an absolute incompetent - but a moronically-marijuana-mumbling Mussolini-modeled modified-Marxist mother's-milquetoast two-bit suburban-street agitating rabble-rouser.
But just you wait until America and the world -- whose very functioning we facilitate -- needs an actual "preident!"
Sad to say but we ain't seen nothing yet.
14. Posted by Brian Richard Allen | June 15, 2010 11:04 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on June 15, 2010 23:04