Come on, this is so preposterous that it has to be the brainchild of the Onion, right? Nope, the feds really did threaten to sue the universities that allowed students to use Kindles for textbooks. Byron York wrote about it last week
Did you know the Justice Department threatened several universities with legal action because they took part in an experimental program to allow students to use the Amazon Kindle for textbooks?Last year, the schools -- among them Princeton, Arizona State and Case Western Reserve -- wanted to know if e-book readers would be more convenient and less costly than traditional textbooks. The environmentally conscious educators also wanted to reduce the huge amount of paper students use to print files from their laptops.
It seemed like a promising idea until the universities got a letter from the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division, now under an aggressive new chief, Thomas Perez, telling them they were under investigation for possible violations of the Americans With Disabilities Act.
Why would the federal government get so upset about something as innocuous as the Kindle? It goes to the heart of what makes the Obama administration tick:
The Civil Rights Division informed the schools they were under investigation. In subsequent talks, the Justice Department demanded the universities stop distributing the Kindle; if blind students couldn't use the device, then nobody could. The Federation made the same demand in a separate lawsuit against Arizona State.
This is what drives the Obama administration's redistributionist policies. If the poor don't have money, then the feds will just take it from the rich and give it to them. Same thing with votes for felons. However, since the feds can't seize the eyes from the sighted and hand them over to the blind, then the feds will just make sure the sighted are denied products the blind can't use. It's all done in the name of "fairness."
But as York noted, the market was at work and solved that problem on its own:
One obvious solution to the problem, of course, was to fix the Kindle. Early on, Amazon told federation officials it would apply text-to-speech technology to the Kindle's menu and function keys. And sure enough, last week the company announced a new generation of Kindles that are fully accessible to the blind. While the Justice Department was making demands, and Perez was making speeches, the market was working.
But don't worry, the feds under the Obama administration will find some way to punish the haves in the name of delivering justice to the have-nots.
Cross-posted at KimPriestap



Comments (26)
Let's ban marching bands to... (Below threshold)1. Posted by GianiD | August 10, 2010 8:20 PM | Score: 5 (5 votes cast)
Let's ban marching bands too, as, if the deaf can't hear them, and the blind cant see them, no one should.
1. Posted by GianiD | August 10, 2010 8:20 PM |
Score: 5 (5 votes cast)
Posted on August 10, 2010 20:20
2. Posted by GarandFan | August 10, 2010 8:31 PM | Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Part of Alinsky's rules. Use the system against the system. Whether it makes sense or not. Holder is at DOJ for a reason, no of it actually having to do with "justice".
2. Posted by GarandFan | August 10, 2010 8:31 PM |
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on August 10, 2010 20:31
3. Posted by pgg | August 10, 2010 8:47 PM | Score: 4 (4 votes cast)
Uh...
books?
3. Posted by pgg | August 10, 2010 8:47 PM |
Score: 4 (4 votes cast)
Posted on August 10, 2010 20:47
4. Posted by James H | August 10, 2010 8:56 PM | Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
I'm generally in favor of the Americans with Disabilities Act, but ...
... Isn't figuring out whether blind students can use the Kindle part of the process of TESTING it?
4. Posted by James H | August 10, 2010 8:56 PM |
Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
Posted on August 10, 2010 20:56
5. Posted by Jeff Blogworthy | August 10, 2010 9:06 PM | Score: 5 (5 votes cast)
Call me crazy, but I think the whole thing is a pretense to cover the real reason. Namely, protecting the companies behind textbook printing and distribution. E-readers have the potential to sink them.
5. Posted by Jeff Blogworthy | August 10, 2010 9:06 PM |
Score: 5 (5 votes cast)
Posted on August 10, 2010 21:06
6. Posted by JLawson | August 10, 2010 9:38 PM | Score: 5 (5 votes cast)
And Kindles have the capability to read the text aloud...
I do believe it's something in the DC water. It might be best to quarantine that entire area, and wait for the madness to subside.
6. Posted by JLawson | August 10, 2010 9:38 PM |
Score: 5 (5 votes cast)
Posted on August 10, 2010 21:38
7. Posted by John S | August 10, 2010 9:49 PM | Score: 7 (7 votes cast)
"E-readers have the potential to sink them..."
Having just been laid off from the textbook industry (to make room for an Indian making 30 cents a day): The books still need to be written, edited, and proofread. And the pages still need to be composed and proofread. The only thing that is eliminated is printing. But the EPA regulations forced all textbook printing to China years ago. And almost all of the pre-press work has gone to India. So Kindles at worst put some Chinese out of work.
7. Posted by John S | August 10, 2010 9:49 PM |
Score: 7 (7 votes cast)
Posted on August 10, 2010 21:49
8. Posted by JLawson | August 10, 2010 9:51 PM | Score: 6 (6 votes cast)
James H -
".. Isn't figuring out whether blind students can use the Kindle part of the process of TESTING it?"
You'd think so, wouldn't you? Personally, I find the presumption that the blind can't figure out how to use buttons on the thing offensive. Hell, I'm a golden retriever with a custom keyboard - I don't have any problems with using a keyboard and I think most humans have better thumbs and tactile abilities than I do.
Do have problems with colors though...
Well, think I'll go take myself for a walk and go to bed.
Woof.
8. Posted by JLawson | August 10, 2010 9:51 PM |
Score: 6 (6 votes cast)
Posted on August 10, 2010 21:51
9. Posted by Corky Boyd | August 10, 2010 9:57 PM | Score: 4 (4 votes cast)
As you point out Kindles have a voice to speech feature that makes them far more helpful than paper books.
Come to think of it, why should DOJ allow paper books?
9. Posted by Corky Boyd | August 10, 2010 9:57 PM |
Score: 4 (4 votes cast)
Posted on August 10, 2010 21:57
10. Posted by James H | August 10, 2010 10:04 PM | Score: 9 (9 votes cast)
I think we should ban marching bands b/c the deaf have an advantage in that they can't hear them.
10. Posted by James H | August 10, 2010 10:04 PM |
Score: 9 (9 votes cast)
Posted on August 10, 2010 22:04
11. Posted by JLawson | August 10, 2010 10:19 PM | Score: 5 (5 votes cast)
LOL @ 10.
Weapons-grade music?
11. Posted by JLawson | August 10, 2010 10:19 PM |
Score: 5 (5 votes cast)
Posted on August 10, 2010 22:19
12. Posted by Roy | August 10, 2010 10:19 PM | Score: 5 (5 votes cast)
It's pretty simple. The liberals can burn books, but not Kindles.
12. Posted by Roy | August 10, 2010 10:19 PM |
Score: 5 (5 votes cast)
Posted on August 10, 2010 22:19
13. Posted by SCSIwuzzy | August 10, 2010 10:19 PM | Score: 5 (5 votes cast)
And next up... the RIAA will sue/lobby to stop this to prevent the damgage to sales of audio books...
13. Posted by SCSIwuzzy | August 10, 2010 10:19 PM |
Score: 5 (5 votes cast)
Posted on August 10, 2010 22:19
14. Posted by James H | August 10, 2010 10:31 PM | Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
JLaw:
Why, yes.
14. Posted by James H | August 10, 2010 10:31 PM |
Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on August 10, 2010 22:31
15. Posted by 914 | August 10, 2010 10:34 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
"if blind students couldn't use the device, then nobody could."
I will now pluck my eyes out so I can get special treatment from Barry n Holder ltd.
Cause I know they care.
15. Posted by 914 | August 10, 2010 10:34 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 10, 2010 22:34
16. Posted by JSchuler | August 10, 2010 11:11 PM | Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Nice to hear the union members admit that their performances are as talentless as a real-time computer generated voice, though.
16. Posted by JSchuler | August 10, 2010 11:11 PM |
Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on August 10, 2010 23:11
17. Posted by James H | August 11, 2010 7:13 AM | Score: -1 (1 votes cast)
JSchuler:
I have some sympathy for voice actors there. If a consortium of voice actors has with Publisher X an exclusive contract to provide voice acting for all of Publisher X's novels, then a lawsuit to stop text-to-speech strikes me as an acceptable defense of the voice actors' contractual rights.
17. Posted by James H | August 11, 2010 7:13 AM |
Score: -1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on August 11, 2010 07:13
18. Posted by JLawson | August 11, 2010 7:54 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
You've got a point re audiobooks, James H - but that doesn't seem to be what is happening here.
Maybe we've reached critial mass re some sectors of government - in order to justify the resources it's taking, it has to find new 'problems' to rectify, which will require more resources, which will require more problems, and more resources, and more problems....
Death spiral, anyone?
18. Posted by JLawson | August 11, 2010 7:54 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 11, 2010 07:54
19. Posted by Mark L | August 11, 2010 8:57 AM | Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Pretty typical of the cur dog philosophy of the ADA. I was living in a small town in Texas in the 1990s. The library was in a building that had been put up in the 1920s. It had a drinking fountain in an alcove that was not wheelchair accessible. It could not be made wheelchair accessible because the alcove was formed by marble pillars. So, in the interest of ADA "fairness" the library had to remove the drinking fountain. Now everyone can go without drinking water, not just the wheelchair-bound.
19. Posted by Mark L | August 11, 2010 8:57 AM |
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on August 11, 2010 08:57
20. Posted by epador | August 11, 2010 9:07 AM | Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
The problem with the text to speech thing is the computers don't offer the interpretation verbally that the actors do - its an entirely different presentation of the material, but in audible form. It sounds to me that their contracts might be in violation of the ADA, and Holder et al ought to look into that. Oops, wrong idea because I'd bet the voice actors UNION all votes Obama.
20. Posted by epador | August 11, 2010 9:07 AM |
Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on August 11, 2010 09:07
21. Posted by WildWillie | August 11, 2010 11:11 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I have a Kindle and absolutely love it. I access the blogs and keep up on the latest books at a fraction of the cost. Why would a liberal NOT want to save trees? I smell a rat in the form of publishing and printing houses. I encourage students to use Kindle. Text books are expensive and if students (parents) can purchase them at a much lower price, that would be great. Not to mention the lack of carrying around all that weight. ww
21. Posted by WildWillie | August 11, 2010 11:11 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 11, 2010 11:11
22. Posted by James H | August 11, 2010 12:26 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
WW:
I, personally, dislike the Kindle. I'm old-fashioned and prefer to hold books in my hand.
22. Posted by James H | August 11, 2010 12:26 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 11, 2010 12:26
23. Posted by Rance | August 11, 2010 2:07 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I have questions which aren't answered in the cited text. Since there are Kindle users here, they probably can answer most of them.
Since not all textbooks are available for the Kindle, were the ones that the university selected also available in braille?
What does the Kindle text-to-speech do when it encounters a table of numbers, a graph, or an equation?
Does the Kindle text-to-speech allow you to easily reread a paragraph or skim through section headers to locate a specific area that you want to access?
23. Posted by Rance | August 11, 2010 2:07 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 11, 2010 14:07
24. Posted by daniel noe | August 11, 2010 8:09 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Not all of us can afford vacations and not all of us are any good at golf. Someone should tell Barry.
24. Posted by daniel noe | August 11, 2010 8:09 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 11, 2010 20:09
25. Posted by JLawson | August 11, 2010 9:08 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
"What does the Kindle text-to-speech do when it encounters a table of numbers, a graph, or an equation?"
Haven't a clue. Don't have a Kindle - like James H I prefer paper.
How do they manage the same items in braille books?
Big deal anyway - just have a braille printed addendum available that goes with the e-text with applicable embossed images. Seems to me to be a non-problem that can be solved with five minutes of thought.
25. Posted by JLawson | August 11, 2010 9:08 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 11, 2010 21:08
26. Posted by Rance | August 12, 2010 5:31 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
JLawson,
The question is not whether those problems can be fixed, it is whether they are already fixed before the Kindle is adopted as the standard.
26. Posted by Rance | August 12, 2010 5:31 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 12, 2010 05:31