« Setting The Straw Man Afire | Main | The FDA considers revoking its approval for breast cancer drug for cost reasons »

President Obama's mosque comments overwhelm news that mosque planners were "open" to talking about moving away from Ground Zero

According to a report by the New York Daily News, the Ground Zero mosque developers were open to discussing moving the mosque to a location away from Ground Zero:

Sponsors of the proposed mosque near Ground Zero are not slamming the door on Gov. Paterson's idea to build the center someplace else.

"We are open to a conversation to find out more on what the governor has in mind," the center, Park51, said in a Twitterpost yesterday.

While mosque opponents charge the chosen site is insensitive to 9/11 victims, Paterson doesn't oppose the planned location.

He suggested earlier this week it might ease tensions if the center was further away from Ground Zero, and raised the possibility of offering state-owned land.

No one knows if mosque developers were sincere in their claim that they were willing to talk about building their mosque somewhere other than Ground Zero, but still the news could have helped tamp down some of the anger. Whatever traction the mosque planners' comments got in the media and on the internet, however, evaporated instantly upon the news of President Obama's pointed remarks at the White House Iftar dinner Friday night:

Recently, attention has been focused on the construction of mosques in certain communities -- particularly New York. Now, we must all recognize and respect the sensitivities surrounding the development of lower Manhattan. The 9/11 attacks were a deeply traumatic event for our country. And the pain and the experience of suffering by those who lost loved ones is just unimaginable. So I understand the emotions that this issue engenders. And ground zero is, indeed, hallowed ground.

But let me be clear. As a citizen, and as president, I believe that Muslims have the same right to practice their religion as everyone else in this country. And that includes the right to build a place of worship and a community center on private property in lower Manhattan, in accordance with local laws and ordinances. This is America. And our commitment to religious freedom must be unshakeable. The principle that people of all faiths are welcome in this country and that they will not be treated differently by their government is essential to who we are. The writ of the founders must endure.

The president's comments reverberated across the country, turning what was a local problem into a national issue and creating even more angst than had existed before he inserted himself into the debate.

S.E. Cupp was accurate when she argued on Hannity last night that Obama's comments were well thought out and purposeful. However, I disagree with her assessment that they were made in an effort to distract the American people from the economy. Rather, the president made his comments for the benefit of Muslims both here in America and overseas. The problem as Deborah Burlingame, who was also on Hannity last night, pointed out, the American people were also listening. Pat Cadell was on along with Deborah and agreed that Obama's comments were said purposefully, but when Hannity asked him to explain what the president was trying to accomplish with his remarks, Pat was at a loss:

It didn't help that the next day the president attempted to diminish the significance of his comments when he said he wasn't editorializing about wisdom of building a mosque so close to Ground Zero, but that was he just acknowledging that Muslims had the right to do so. This is a point the President and the American people agree on. However, the president's tone gave the American people the distinct impression that he supported the idea of a mosque being built at Ground Zero, which puts him at odds with the vast majority of the American people, once again.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/39873.

Comments (6)

"but when Hannit... (Below threshold)
914:


"but when Hannity asked him to explain what the president was trying to accomplish with his remarks, Pat was at a loss:"


Its easy Pat.

Barry's ego was trying to push him out of the closet and admit where his heart really lie's.


"Whatever traction the mosq... (Below threshold)
Rance:

"Whatever traction the mosque planners' comments got in the media and on the internet, however, evaporated instantly..."

So???

Do you thing the mosque people and the governor's office are going to abandon discussion because it has "lost traction"?

If both sides are serious, they will talk.

"Recently, attention has... (Below threshold)
Oyster:

"Recently, attention has been focused on the construction of mosques in certain communities -- particularly New York."

That's odd, because the only one I've heard about in which people are upset is the one at ground zero. Or was he trying to imply that there's a rash of protesting about mosques so that he could make it sound like there was a wave of intolerance and bigotry against Muslims?

Really. Can someone explain to me what attention has been focused on what communities?

"...the president made his ... (Below threshold)
GarandFan:

"...the president made his comments for the benefit of Muslims...."

No Kim. Barry was making the comments for the benefit of Barry. He's in campaign mode 24/7. He was pandering for votes. Charles Krauthammer had the best take on it. Barry could have commented about the RIGHT and at the same time the WISDOM of building there. He choose not to for a reason. To me, the term "cowardice" comes to mind.

Saw a quote today - <... (Below threshold)
galoob:

Saw a quote today -

"In America, we don't tell people based on their race or religion or ethnicity that they are free in this place, but not in that place."

So true, and so forgotten by the proto-fascists here.

<a href="http://www.google.... (Below threshold)



Advertisements









rightads.gif

beltwaybloggers.gif

insiderslogo.jpg

mba_blue.gif

Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile

Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links

Credits

Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login



Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy