The Anchoress brings us to this InsideCatholic piece righteously titled "Newsflash: Benedict isn't the angry, aloof pope we keep insisting he is":
Deacon Greg linked to an article in the Vancouver Sun this morning that wrapped up the pope's UK visit, and I'm exasperated just from the title:
Pope sheds 'Vatican Rottweiler' image on Britain trip
Really? Are we still acting surprised when, once again, Pope Benedict turns out to be nothing like the angry caricature so often painted of him?
...
I'm curious to know how many state visits it will take -- how many meetings with abuse victims, how many World Youth Days, how many photo ops like this -- before people stop trotting out the Rottweiler line, as if he has suddenly undergone some radical transformation, and state the obvious: Pope Benedict is a "shy," "warm," "lovable, elderly figure." It's not some act he's putting on to win over crowds; anyone who has been paying attention would know that -- as the massive crowds who turned out for his visit can attest.
Yes, Benedict had a reputation (unfair even then) as the Church's watchdog -- ten years ago. He's now been pope for five. It's not like he's been hiding under a rock all that time, and this is some shocking new character development. Can we please come up with some new headlines?
Of course, the answer to that last question is no.
The filtration system used by leftist media and the gullible who take it all in can't allow a positive portrayal of the Pope to get out, for in too many ways he and the church he leads is anathema to their own misguided faith. After all, isn't the Pope anti-women, anti-gay and God forbid, anti-choice? And hasn't he done all he can to cover up the pedophilia scandal? Those are bedrock dogmas of the Religious Left and anyone who stands in the way of those beliefs is Satan to them and so will be portrayed as such... with one key exception.
This same bunch of leftist ideologues will bend over backwards to portray the Islamic faith positively. They will ignore a faith system that truly subjugates women and absolutely persecutes gays. They won't report on the rampant pedophilia engaged in by the faithful or the fact that Muhammad its founder married a 9 year old girl.
It's a juxtaposition that may initially seem puzzling unless viewed through the prism of Veritas. In the end, and this will certainly bust a leftist vein or two, it's about truth or if I might especially offend, The Truth.
A false belief system will never embrace The Truth and in fact will do all it can to prevent its spread to include propping up like belief systems also built on lies.



Comments (12)
I personally believe he sho... (Below threshold)1. Posted by James H | September 22, 2010 8:48 AM | Score: 0 (4 votes cast)
I personally believe he should have kept the "Cardinal Ratzinger" name simply because the name sounds like a villain from Hogan's Heroes.
1. Posted by James H | September 22, 2010 8:48 AM |
Score: 0 (4 votes cast)
Posted on September 22, 2010 08:48
2. Posted by Andrew X | September 22, 2010 9:32 AM | Score: 2 (4 votes cast)
May I propose a better headline for your post?
'The entire world, everything about the human race presently, the past 5,000 years of its history, and it's entire proposed future, isn't what the left says it is.
Today's Chapter: #475,693 -- The Pope.'
I just think it flows much better, don't you?
2. Posted by Andrew X | September 22, 2010 9:32 AM |
Score: 2 (4 votes cast)
Posted on September 22, 2010 09:32
3. Posted by galoob | September 22, 2010 10:23 AM | Score: -7 (11 votes cast)
Mohammed married a nine year old 1400 years ago.
Benedict was covering up for and enabling child molesters a lot more recently, up to 2002 at least.
What's your point, Rick? Catholicism: not as evil as Islam? Priests don't molest as many boys as primitive Pashtun tribesmen in Afghanistan?
Well, that's a pretty low bar, you win.
3. Posted by galoob | September 22, 2010 10:23 AM |
Score: -7 (11 votes cast)
Posted on September 22, 2010 10:23
4. Posted by SCSIwuzzy | September 22, 2010 11:45 AM | Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
galoob, present some actual evidence that the Pope knowingly and purposefully covered up or enabled child molestation.
Seriously, not allegations, proof. Put up or shut up.
4. Posted by SCSIwuzzy | September 22, 2010 11:45 AM |
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on September 22, 2010 11:45
5. Posted by GarandFan | September 22, 2010 11:49 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
"Put up or shut up."
You mean he can't just repeat what he's heard? But that's all he knows.
5. Posted by GarandFan | September 22, 2010 11:49 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 22, 2010 11:49
6. Posted by ODA315 | September 22, 2010 12:02 PM | Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
He'll need to convert to the "religion of peace" to get better press.
6. Posted by ODA315 | September 22, 2010 12:02 PM |
Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on September 22, 2010 12:02
7. Posted by Dane | September 22, 2010 1:34 PM | Score: -2 (4 votes cast)
I don't know, rick. The Catholic church has engaged ins a systematic cover-up of child abuse by catholic clergy.
I guess conservatives like yourself don't care about morality as much as you pretend to.
This is all part of a PR campaign by the vatican to shift blame.
Good cover, Rick. And I'm guessing the Pope didnt' ask about your penis. Big relief there, eh?
7. Posted by Dane | September 22, 2010 1:34 PM |
Score: -2 (4 votes cast)
Posted on September 22, 2010 13:34
8. Posted by Steve Crickmore | September 22, 2010 2:34 PM | Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
It is always difficult arguing with conservatives about religion and the corruption of their temporal representatives.
I`m surprised that Pope Benedict XV1 didn't give the defence of the Jew in one of Boccaccio's stories, who said after returning from Rome to embrace Catholicism, "any organization that can survive such corruption must be the true Church."
8. Posted by Steve Crickmore | September 22, 2010 2:34 PM |
Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on September 22, 2010 14:34
9. Posted by galoob | September 22, 2010 5:29 PM | Score: -1 (1 votes cast)
The Pope's a wanker.
http://www.boston.com/news/local/breaking_news/2010/04/benedict_called.html
http://richarddawkins.net/articles/521113-ratzinger-is-an-enemy-of-humanity
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/02/world/europe/02pope.html
9. Posted by galoob | September 22, 2010 5:29 PM |
Score: -1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on September 22, 2010 17:29
10. Posted by Harmon | September 22, 2010 9:22 PM | Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
For galoob Dane and Crickmore: Lincoln's advice is pertinent to your views on religion in general and the Catholic Church in particular: "Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt."
You all have removed the doubt.
10. Posted by Harmon | September 22, 2010 9:22 PM |
Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on September 22, 2010 21:22
11. Posted by Steve Crickmore | September 22, 2010 11:51 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Harmon, as a student of Johnson, by memory I know it was Dr. Johnson who said "It is better to be thought a fool, than to open one's mouth and remove all doubts". That is more eloquent.
11. Posted by Steve Crickmore | September 22, 2010 11:51 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 22, 2010 23:51
12. Posted by Dane | September 23, 2010 7:05 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
So Harmon got the quote wrong and also who said it?
I wonder if he knows what day of the week it is.
Gawd, these morons are fun to poke and prod. You push them and then watch the hot air escape from their assorted orifices.
12. Posted by Dane | September 23, 2010 7:05 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 23, 2010 19:05