Going out on a limb here, but I'm pretty sure the readers of Wizbang are politically savvy enough to already know how to tell the party affiliation of any candidate is by using their website. I just wonder if you would agree with me on these two points:
- If the site has "Republican" plastered all over everywhere (or even has the bonus "Tea Party endorsement"), the guy/gal is a Republican.
- If the site has absolutely no mention of the candidate's political party, then the gal/guy/guygal is Democratic.
Am I makin' any sense here?
Permalink | Linking Blogs | Sphere: Related Content | Digg this! | FARK It!
Filed under:
Democrats, Elections, Politicians, Republicans
Comments (9)
This applies to MSM "news" ... (Below threshold)1. Posted by Sheik Yur Bouty | October 31, 2010 1:14 AM | Score: 7 (7 votes cast)
This applies to MSM "news" stories also...
1. Posted by Sheik Yur Bouty | October 31, 2010 1:14 AM |
Score: 7 (7 votes cast)
Posted on October 31, 2010 01:14
2. Posted by proof | October 31, 2010 1:31 AM | Score: 6 (6 votes cast)
Stealth: It's not just for the military anymore!
2. Posted by proof | October 31, 2010 1:31 AM |
Score: 6 (6 votes cast)
Posted on October 31, 2010 01:31
3. Posted by MichaelC | October 31, 2010 4:57 AM | Score: 5 (5 votes cast)
I have noticed that precise phenomena on a good deal of the campaign literature that shows up in my snail mailbox every day.
3. Posted by MichaelC | October 31, 2010 4:57 AM |
Score: 5 (5 votes cast)
Posted on October 31, 2010 04:57
4. Posted by Gmac | October 31, 2010 6:31 AM | Score: 5 (5 votes cast)
Its the funniest damn thing I've ever seen.
It's almost like they were ashamed of being one or something.
4. Posted by Gmac | October 31, 2010 6:31 AM |
Score: 5 (5 votes cast)
Posted on October 31, 2010 06:31
5. Posted by MunDane68 | October 31, 2010 9:31 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
For what it's worth, Loretta Sanchez's signs in Santa Ana identify her as a Democrat.
5. Posted by MunDane68 | October 31, 2010 9:31 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 31, 2010 09:31
6. Posted by Rich | October 31, 2010 11:27 AM | Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Thats because they know if you see its from a democrat it will go straight to the trash. Leaving it unidentified allows at least an extra minute or so in the hand before you toss it.
6. Posted by Rich | October 31, 2010 11:27 AM |
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on October 31, 2010 11:27
7. Posted by epador | October 31, 2010 11:54 AM | Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
Well, I received an interesting flyer in the mail titled The Oregon Democrat (or something like that). It was written by AFP-like folks and very carefully documented all the votes for increased spending and taxes, early release of criminals, etc., foisted by elected Democrats in the fine State of Oregon.
7. Posted by epador | October 31, 2010 11:54 AM |
Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
Posted on October 31, 2010 11:54
8. Posted by Maddox | October 31, 2010 2:04 PM | Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Also, if the ad or site uses the words "conservative independent" you can be sure the candidate is a Democrat seeking re-election. Bobby Bright in Alabama is one of pond sucking scum that has supported Nancy Pelosi but has come home to conservatism just in time for the election.
8. Posted by Maddox | October 31, 2010 2:04 PM |
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on October 31, 2010 14:04
9. Posted by DaveK | November 1, 2010 9:34 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
That is something that I have noticed, too. Which makes me wonder- with all these "conservatives" running for reelection, how did ObamaCare get passed in the first place?
9. Posted by DaveK | November 1, 2010 9:34 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on November 1, 2010 09:34