The Keith Olberman story keeps on giving and giving. This time with video!
Also, Althouse writes: "Think Progress's eagerness to blame a conservative resulted in an elaborate post that is now so studded with backtracking updates as to be unreadable." Indeed. You need to map to make sense of this thing.
1. Posted by
Stan | November 6, 2010 1:43 PM | Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
Stan:
I read on the Think Progress piece that Olby was a highly rated star over at PSMNBC. Sure would like to sample what they are smoking over there.
According to Nielson, he was in sewer -- even by that network standards. So maybe it was a good thing that they let him go. Of course they would back him, because he believed the same way that they believed.
Evil thought here, following up on Jay Tea's earlier post. That Fox News hires him and he turns into a conservative more rabid than Sean Hannity. Oh would the Olby supporters, in the state controlled media, have a hissy fit over that one.
1. Posted by
Stan | November 6, 2010 1:43 PM |
Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
2. Posted by
GarandFan | November 6, 2010 2:20 PM | Score: 4 (4 votes cast)
GarandFan:
Couldn't happen to a nicer guy. Still waiting to see if he'll get a job offer from the same people who hired Dan Rather. Some obscure radio station no one listens to.
2. Posted by
GarandFan | November 6, 2010 2:20 PM |
Score: 4 (4 votes cast)
4. Posted by
Jim Addison | November 7, 2010 1:28 AM | Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Jim Addison:
I can't stand the sight or sound of the jerk and never watch him, but this is just garbage. He's being screwed.
While he describes himself as a "newscaster," no serious-minded person could possibly believe he represents himself and his broadcasting as "news." It's "commentary" - of the wild-eyed anti-American radical left variety, but nonetheless.
Is there anyone that thinks Olby would be biased toward those he donates money to? Well, crapola, amigas, he's biased in EVERYTHING he says. Why would they be any different.
Notice the NBC News restrictions don't apply to executives. 'cause that wouldn't matter, would it? Like if GE (which owns NBC, etc.) gave out a bunch of political donations to get Congress to force America to stop buying regular light bulbs and start buy special, mercury-tainted, expensive new bulbs made by . . . GE and its licensees, NBC News would be all over that story, right?
[/rolleyes]
In fact, such bogus "ethical guidelines" actually serve to fool the public, not enlighten us. The news readers are no less biased if they are not allowed to donate to whoever they wish, but the public is less likely to stumble upon solid proof of that bias if donations are banned.
Leave Olby alone! (Where's that YouTube dude when you really need him)? I don't agree with what he says, but if he can find enough people stupid and/or malicious enough to listen to him so he can make a buck, more power to him. That's freedom, that's America, even if Olby and his ilk hate it, they deserve the same chance to make it as every other citizen - and to be able to exercise their 1st Amendment right to further political speech with their own money.
4. Posted by
Jim Addison | November 7, 2010 1:28 AM |
Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Get Wizbang in your inbox by submitting your email address below.
Fresh Links
The Wizbang® Network
Credits
Section Editor: Maggie Whitton
Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert
Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port
Comments (4)
I read on the Think Progres... (Below threshold)1. Posted by Stan | November 6, 2010 1:43 PM | Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
I read on the Think Progress piece that Olby was a highly rated star over at PSMNBC. Sure would like to sample what they are smoking over there.
According to Nielson, he was in sewer -- even by that network standards. So maybe it was a good thing that they let him go. Of course they would back him, because he believed the same way that they believed.
Evil thought here, following up on Jay Tea's earlier post. That Fox News hires him and he turns into a conservative more rabid than Sean Hannity. Oh would the Olby supporters, in the state controlled media, have a hissy fit over that one.
1. Posted by Stan | November 6, 2010 1:43 PM |
Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
Posted on November 6, 2010 13:43
2. Posted by GarandFan | November 6, 2010 2:20 PM | Score: 4 (4 votes cast)
Couldn't happen to a nicer guy. Still waiting to see if he'll get a job offer from the same people who hired Dan Rather. Some obscure radio station no one listens to.
2. Posted by GarandFan | November 6, 2010 2:20 PM |
Score: 4 (4 votes cast)
Posted on November 6, 2010 14:20
3. Posted by 914 | November 6, 2010 10:32 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
"Still waiting to see if he'll get a job offer from the same people who hired Dan Rather. Some obscure radio station no one listens to."
Air America?
3. Posted by 914 | November 6, 2010 10:32 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on November 6, 2010 22:32
4. Posted by Jim Addison | November 7, 2010 1:28 AM | Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
I can't stand the sight or sound of the jerk and never watch him, but this is just garbage. He's being screwed.
While he describes himself as a "newscaster," no serious-minded person could possibly believe he represents himself and his broadcasting as "news." It's "commentary" - of the wild-eyed anti-American radical left variety, but nonetheless.
Is there anyone that thinks Olby would be biased toward those he donates money to? Well, crapola, amigas, he's biased in EVERYTHING he says. Why would they be any different.
Notice the NBC News restrictions don't apply to executives. 'cause that wouldn't matter, would it? Like if GE (which owns NBC, etc.) gave out a bunch of political donations to get Congress to force America to stop buying regular light bulbs and start buy special, mercury-tainted, expensive new bulbs made by . . . GE and its licensees, NBC News would be all over that story, right?
[/rolleyes]
In fact, such bogus "ethical guidelines" actually serve to fool the public, not enlighten us. The news readers are no less biased if they are not allowed to donate to whoever they wish, but the public is less likely to stumble upon solid proof of that bias if donations are banned.
Leave Olby alone! (Where's that YouTube dude when you really need him)? I don't agree with what he says, but if he can find enough people stupid and/or malicious enough to listen to him so he can make a buck, more power to him. That's freedom, that's America, even if Olby and his ilk hate it, they deserve the same chance to make it as every other citizen - and to be able to exercise their 1st Amendment right to further political speech with their own money.
4. Posted by Jim Addison | November 7, 2010 1:28 AM |
Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on November 7, 2010 01:28