"Jack Dunphy" of Pajamas Media, who is actually an incognito LAPD cop, fills us in on what Eric Holder and the Department of Justice are stooping to in their continued quest to foster racial problems in America:
The story popped up on the Los Angeles Times website Saturday night. The headline: "Justice Department warns LAPD to take a stronger stance against racial profiling."
One might assume on reading such a headline that the Justice Department had uncovered some damning evidence that Los Angeles Police Department officers, even after working for years under the terms of a consent decree and the watchful eyes of a federal monitor, were engaging in discriminatory practices. In the print edition, the story was given any newspaper's most prominent placement: above the fold on the front page of the Sunday edition. This, the Times was saying, is a Very Important Story, so important in fact that they followed up with a typically sophomoric editorial in Tuesday's edition, ominously titled "Shades of the 'old' LAPD."
But if you had read Sunday's story in search of the damning evidence you thought had been uncovered, you might have reached the end of it and said to yourself, "Wait a minute, that's ... it?"
The evidence cited by the Justice Department and the Times fell somewhere well short of damning, to wit, a single conversation -- recorded inadvertently and perhaps illegally -- between an LAPD supervisor and two officers, in which the officers were dismissive of allegations of racial profiling.
The incident is detailed at the link and should be passed around.
More evidence that we are led by radicals and that they are attempting to do great harm to this country.
Permalink | Linking Blogs | Sphere: Related Content | Digg this! | FARK It!
Filed under:
WTF?
Comments (8)
Wait... what?Calif... (Below threshold)1. Posted by JLawson | November 19, 2010 7:29 AM | Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Wait... what?
California's rapidly doing a swan dive into the dumpster. The state is beset with problems - and the LA Times most pressing issue is ... this?
Okay, obviously SOMEONE'S perspective is a bit off...
1. Posted by JLawson | November 19, 2010 7:29 AM |
Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on November 19, 2010 07:29
2. Posted by GarandFan | November 19, 2010 10:27 AM | Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
The LA Times is in competition with the NY Times to see which is more worthless.
2. Posted by GarandFan | November 19, 2010 10:27 AM |
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on November 19, 2010 10:27
3. Posted by Les Nessman | November 19, 2010 10:45 AM | Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Whites have the responsibilities of men. They are held accountable for their (real or imagined) actions.
'Minorities' have the responsibilities of boys. In a lot of cases, they are not held accountable for their actions.
At least, that's how our PC society treats the races, by laws, affirmative action rules and customs.
So, how do you guys like being treated as boys?
Do you like being boys?
3. Posted by Les Nessman | November 19, 2010 10:45 AM |
Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on November 19, 2010 10:45
4. Posted by GarandFan | November 19, 2010 2:35 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Deep down it's "Okay, we're letting him off in exchange for screwing Spitball Clyburn. We're even."
4. Posted by GarandFan | November 19, 2010 2:35 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on November 19, 2010 14:35
5. Posted by Steve Crickmore | November 19, 2010 5:04 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Rick:More evidence that we are led by radicals and that they are attempting to do great harm to this country.
Just like the those radicals, the Obama administration bailing out GM and saving 1.4 million American jobs from GM and collateral auto supply jobs, a bailout that you had the vapors over.">http://wizbangblog.com/content/2010/04/27/is-gm-lying-to-the-american-people.php"> Is GM Lying to the Public
5. Posted by Steve Crickmore | November 19, 2010 5:04 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on November 19, 2010 17:04
6. Posted by Steve Crickmore | November 19, 2010 5:13 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
(Continued )Rick:
Rick, how is the bailout going and GM lying to the public with their share offering yesterday. You had better warn all the investors of GM that they are part of the radical America that is causing great harm to our country.
6. Posted by Steve Crickmore | November 19, 2010 5:13 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on November 19, 2010 17:13
7. Posted by GarandFan | November 19, 2010 7:32 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Right on Stevie! The taxpayer only lost a little over $4.3 BILLION in that offering!
7. Posted by GarandFan | November 19, 2010 7:32 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on November 19, 2010 19:32
8. Posted by Steve Crickmore | November 20, 2010 5:57 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
That is s small price to pay and they wouldn't have lost any, if they had waited a year when the stock will be higher but irresponsible right wing crazies were afraid that the government wanted to control GM stock, when the obama administration were just trying to save it from going down the tubes. Any government worth it`s salt would have done the same. Are you aware all the subsdies and tax breaks we give to firms in the aerospace and defense industries and they don't have a fraction of the workers involved as in the auto industry? Even Ford lobbied hard for a temporary government majority control of gm because they knew it would have met a collapse of the US auto industry- not that the tea party lunatic fringe were interested in that.
8. Posted by Steve Crickmore | November 20, 2010 5:57 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on November 20, 2010 17:57