« "if he'd been a black writer; his prose would stand unassailed" | Main | Another Day Older And Deeper In Debt »

The Maltheists


Most people, including many who call themselves Christians, Muslims, and so on, are actually atheists in practice.  Think about it.  If you really, truly, believed that God is real and exists, then you would weigh your decisions and choose your actions with some serious interest in aligning things with His will, either out of love and evotion, or from fear of punishment or retribution.  That does not match up well with the way people really act, including a disappointingly large number of mullahs, priests, ministers and so on.  Let's be honest - we all spend a lot of our energy, time, and focus thinking about how to get what we want for ourselves, and to prevent bad things from happening to ourselves.  Some of that is biology (self-preservation) and some of it is cultural, but from what I see, pretty much everybody spends at least 85% of their time and effort on themselves.  The use of religion, therefore, as an excuse to get what you want while pretending you're a great guy, must therefore be considered early on as a popular human hobby.

 

I suspect this false devotion bothers a certain number of people, but what else is interesting is that hatred of religious practice and beliefs is very broad and has a very long history.  And not just by Nazis, Cossacks and West Coast lawyers, either.  A great many 'regular' people have found it, hmm, kosher to insult and deride people for their religious beliefs and practices.  For every person who finds they cannot live without a reference to God on our coins, there seem to be as many or more who cannot live with any reference to God, no matter how vague.  A sizable demographic has always found it not only reasonable to reject religion, but fashionable to attack and harass anyone who practices their faith, especially if that faith requires standards of dress or behavior which do not match popular social behavior.  As a result, while it is not only illegal to discriminate against someone on the basis of their race or gender, but is also strongly disapproved by the public in general, and there is strong emotional support for perceived victims of discrimination because of sexual orientation or certain niche demographics, there is a common sense that insulting and harassing people for overt expressions of faith is not only acceptable but expected.  Hence the consistent derision in popular dramas of anyone who displays their faith in public, and the same in many business practices - pray all you like, as long as it's not where anyone else can see it.  Come to that, many businesses have policies regarding religious expression which are similar to their policy regarding sexual harassment; if you get caught showing faith, expect the hammer to come down hard, albeit in unofficial form.  To put it plainly, there are quite a few people who, whether they believe in God or not, hate Him, anyone who believes in Him, and even mention of Him.  These are the maltheists.

 

The best-known maltheist, of course, is Satan, a being who rebelled against God, then when he realized that course was futile, set about hurting God the most effective way he could, by attacking, polluting, and subverting God's children on earth.  There are a lot of people who have no trouble trying to eradicate people whose religion offends them; the Russian then Soviet progroms against Jews, for example, the 'ethnic cleansing' in the Balkans, not only now but also back before World War I, and Muslim suppression of non-Islamic beliefs in any country they control.  Maltheism in practice ranges from sneering condescension of anyone who practices a faith all to the way to genocide. 

 

Let's look at that for a moment.  'Genocide' is a word often used in exaggerated in discussing alleged abuse of various groups.  But when a writer speaks against a perceived reluctance to spend more tax money on AIDS research, calling it 'genocide of gays' is not only inaccurate and a false indictment of the intentions of the relevant parties, it cheapens and insults the memory of real victims of genocide, like Buchenwald or Rwanda, Darfur or Bosnia.  It ignores the history of the Genocide Convention, which at its inception in 1948 recognized that many people have been killed, in history and in contemporary days, simply for their religious identity and beliefs.  Maltheists therefore, not only exist and in both significant numbers and power, but also practice hatred of faith to a degree that includes deliberate, premeditated murder.  Most malthesists, of course, are not violent but merely advocate a lower-level hatred against people of faith, and imagine as a result that their hatred is not only excusable but a reasonable practice of free speech.  A State Department briefing paper published in 1996, however, notes that this sort of speech can be a step on the road to advocation of violence, in "The 8 Stages of Genocide" :

 

Stage 1:  Division into 'us' and 'them'

 

Stage 2:  Symbolism used to demean and insult target groups

 

Stage 3:  Dehumanization

 

Stage 4:  Organization of programs to oppress target group

 

Stage 5:  Polarization, especially using the media

 

Stage 6:  Preparation, target groups singled out by religious/ethnic identity

 

Stage 7:  Mass Killing

 

Stage 8:  Denial

 

The active conditions in many countries where differing stages exist should be obvious to the reader.  And going back to the idea that most people look out for themselves most of all, it should be easy to understand why people who practice religious beliefs would be seen as irritating minorities and obvious targets for exclusion and reprisals.  Religious people may seem to be trying to show off a superior personal morality, even when they only hold themselves to a personal code of ethics based on their religion.  That a few high-profile religious figureheads try to hijack faith for their personal benefit only adds gasoline to the fire, as maltheists use the offenses of the few to condemn the many. 

 

I am not saying that most maltheists would like to commit violence against people of faith, nor even that they would approve of violence against religion.  The problem is that the opinion and character of  maltheists is consistent, from insults against God and the people who believe in Him, all the way through to those who try to kill in the name of that hate.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/40876.

Comments (6)

I am an atheist but am comp... (Below threshold)
Bob:

I am an atheist but am completely tolerant of the religious observance of my fellow citizens. (This does not include tolerance of any type of violence against others carried out in the name of Allah, God or religion.) This country was founded and built by men and women of faith - mostly but not exclusively Christian.

The First Amendment protects against the establishment of religion and the abridgment of the free exercise of religion, but it was not designed to protect against the use of religious symbols (crosses, stars of David and crescents) in military cemeteries, the opening of Congress with prayers, employment of chaplains, the adoption of "In God We Trust" as the national motto, or the words "under God" in the pledge of allegiance.

When atheists or others actively try to suppress public religious expression of others, they generally generate only a backlash against themselves and their own beliefs. While it sounds unduly liberal, tolerance really is the right posture when it comes to religion. (Liberals are tolerant of some religious expression but are intolerant of deviations from their idea of "mainstream" political thought, as illustrated by NPR's firing of Juan Williams, overtly for expressing fear of muslims in airports dressed as muslims but really for his frequent appearances on the Fox News Channel.)

Original sin would dictate ... (Below threshold)
Roy:

Original sin would dictate that everyone is a "fallen" maltheist, until converted (i.e. justified).

I would point out a well ar... (Below threshold)
Jeff:

I would point out a well armed population has never been the victim of genocide ...

good fences make good neighbors ...

I would argue that the Esta... (Below threshold)
James H:

I would argue that the Establishment Clause provides ample basis to bar "In God We Trust" from coins, "Under God" from the Pledge of Allegiance, and so forth ...

... However, I also think that atheists who sue over those sorts of things, quite frankly, need to get a hobby, perhaps something involving bottlecaps, rather than pester the court system over what amount to de minimis bits of deism that offend no one.

"Peace through superior fir... (Below threshold)
Gmac:

"Peace through superior firepower"

When a single state, MI, can field 700,000 hunters I seriously doubt any maltheists would want to annoy the general population with such fantasies.

I have said for years that ... (Below threshold)
Pile of Pooh:

I have said for years that moral atheism is the most difficult of life paths. It requires that one gaze into oblivion, accept it, and then choose to act in a moral and ethical fashion of one's own accord, out of a simple conviction that is best for society. I won't say that I've always succeeded in that ideal, but I have always tried.

So when a religious zealot calls me an immoral heathen or some other stripe of insult, I simply laugh it off. There is a difference between an atheist and a hedonist, though most self-declared religious types (and more than a few self-declared atheists) cannot fathom that difference. I also realized at an early age that Pascal's Wager is the last refuge of cowards and opportunists.

I do not think that the 96%+ of people who believe in a deity and/or afterlife are wrong, I simply don't think it matters a fig damn. Beliefs are irrelevant; only actions matter.




Advertisements









rightads.gif

beltwaybloggers.gif

insiderslogo.jpg

mba_blue.gif

Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile

Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links

Credits

Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login



Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy