« Drug Running For Dummies | Main | "Serious concern" at Utah Army Base (UPDATED) »

Let Them Eat Their Own Dogfood

There's a superb phrase that apparently came out of the software development field that encapsulates a tremendously useful concept -- "eating your own dogfood."  In brief, if you produce something and you expect people to believe in it enough to buy it and use it, you should be willing to use it yourself. The refusal of a group to eat its own dogfood is usually a good sign to stay the hell away from the product.

Which is a concept that we desperately need to apply to ObamaCare. When it was passed, apparently there was a provision that allowed employers to apply for and be granted waivers excluding them from its provisions. (I say "apparently" because it's still not clear that anyone has actually read the whole thing. Certainly not a lot of those who voted for it.)

Well, someone did read that part of ObamaCare. And they've been using that provision quite a bit. In fact, as of last count, over 700 employers, with over 2.2 million employees, have sought and been granted waivers from the provisions of the law. And there are another 93,000 workers whose employers are looking to get out of having to comply with ObamaCare.

If you look over that list, you'll see a lot of unions listed. These aren't unions who are asking that their members be excluded. Oh, no, that isn't the case. No, these unions -- who spent millions and millions of their members money to push for ObamaCare to be passed -- are asking that they not have to provide health care for their own employees.

As they've shown plenty of times in the past, if you want union benefits, join a union -- but for god's sake, don't actually work for one. They tend to treat their employees far worse than any of the employers they deal with. Wouldn't it be fun to unionize union employees? But I digress...

Anyway, back to the whole waiver situation. It speaks volumes that the groups who pushed the hardest to get this bill passed are the first in line to ask to be excluded from it. They are saying, in essence, "this is wonderful and essential for all Americans to be forced to comply with it -- just not us."

This waiver system is clearly broken -- and that's not even mentioning how the Obama administration apparently sat on releasing the latest list of recipients until after the State of the Union address. And it's emblematic of just how screwed-up the whole ObamaCare system is.

Personally, I think that the whole ObamaCare program is so screwed-up that it should be dragged out to the nearest public green and have a catheter driven through its heart, then hanged from a tree with red tape. But that's too much to hope for.

So, instead, let's just look at the waiver program. This piecemeal process, with those who backed the measure being rewarded with being excluded from it, is utterly unacceptable. It's old-fashioned quid pro quo, one of the most basic forms of corruption, coupled with a most stunning form of hypocrisy. So here are two modest proposals to make it if not fair, than at least modestly less heinous:

1) Grant anyone a waiver who asks for it. Make the whole damned thin optional for everyone, not just those who helped pass the thing (mandate and all) in the first place and have curried favor with the powers that be, but those who didn't want anything to do with it in the first place. Think about that -- those who pushed hard for the mandatory nature of this bill are the first to ask -- and get -- permission to be excluded from it, while those who opposed it are the ones who are being forced to comply with it.

2) No waivers for anyone. Period. If it's mandatory for some, it's mandatory for all -- let's start pushing 14th Amendment arguments and all demand to be treated equally under the law. No special treatment, no 2nd-class employees who don't get the "benefits" of being covered by ObamaCare, no favored treatment for Obama administration allies who don't want to have to live under the rules they fought so hard for.

ObamaCare was riddled with fraud and dishonesty from the outset, and it just keeps getting worse and worse and worse. At some point, we have to pass the breaking point and simply say "enough."

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/41002.

Comments (6)

Unfortunately, even the wai... (Below threshold)
Bob:

Unfortunately, even the waivers are only temporary. Within a couple years, even the employers (including Mickey D's, the unions, etc.) will have to comply with the law: provide coverage or pay a federal fine. That's when the rubber will meet the road, so to speak. If nothing is done to revise the law in the meantime, I predict our present 9.4% unemployment will look like the good old days. A lot of employers will cut down on their insurance costs or penalty payments by decreasing the number of employees. Obama doesn't have to follow good sense but he can't repeal the laws of economics.

Few things more permanent t... (Below threshold)
JLawson:

Few things more permanent than something the government calls 'temporary'...

Hey, ask anyone in the military. How many 'temporary' buildings are scattered around, built for WW2, still in use today? Local base demolished one about 5 years back, built in 1943 when it was an army air field - it was still being used as the post office and other offices. That's (counts on fingers quickly...) 62+ years. Not bad for something designed for about 5....

Remember, some groups are m... (Below threshold)
Gmac:

Remember, some groups are more equal than others when it comes to the favor of this regime.

I'm not a lawyer, nor do I ... (Below threshold)
david:

I'm not a lawyer, nor do I play one on TV, but I doubt the waiver system would hold up to a 14th amendment challenge by an employer denied a waiver. In addition, it would be priceless to hear the testimony, in open court, of those who pressed hardest for Obamacare, explaining why it should not apply to THEM.

I still get a chuckle when ... (Below threshold)
GarandFan:

I still get a chuckle when I hear the words "temporary waivers".

Is that like the Medicare fix? You know, the one that gets extended every year? The one Nancy Pelosi said would finally be enforced?

Obamacare is and never was ... (Below threshold)
Morrissimo:

Obamacare is and never was about providing health care, but about opening up a vast new revenue stream with which to kick the federal financial crisis down the road for a few more years. All the Obamacare FUD about its "purpose" is just yet another flavor of bread-and-circuses - the classic magician's trick of "look at this hand, not the hand that's making something disappear".




Advertisements









rightads.gif

beltwaybloggers.gif

insiderslogo.jpg

mba_blue.gif

Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile

Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links

Credits

Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login



Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy