« Rage Like An Egyptian | Main | Obama pushes for a more litigious society »

Unexpectedly ... unemployment actually DROPS


Well, I guess the recent insanely stupid efforts by liberals to spin unemployment numbers weren't necessary after all:

Today's employment report shows that the unemployment rate fell sharply to 9.0 percent and private sector payrolls increased by 50,000 in January. Revisions to private sector payroll data show that 1.1 million jobs were added during 2010, the strongest private sector job growth since 2006. The 0.8 percentage point decline in the unemployment rate over the past two months is a welcome development; however, the rate remains unacceptably high.

... Overall payroll employment rose by 36,000 last month. Among the sectors with the largest payroll employment growth were manufacturing (+49,000), retail and wholesale trade (+36,700), and professional and business services (+31,000). Transportation and warehousing (-38,000), construction (-32,000), finance (-10,000), and local government (-10,000) were among the sectors that subtracted from the total. Severe weather in some parts of the country may have impacted employment and hours in some industries.

The 0.4 percentage point decline in the unemployment rate to 9.0 percent in January was accounted for by a large increase in employment as measured by the household survey (which is separate from the payroll survey). The labor force participation rate was unchanged.

This was truly unexpected, given that the Gallup Unemployment Survey, which was released a day before the official White House unemployment numbers, put the January unemployment rate at 9.8%, with an underemployment rate measured at 18.9%.

Although the labor force participation rate remains relatively unchanged between December 2010 and January 2011, comparing the January 2010 and January 2011 numbers reveals a drastic decline.  We are currently at a 26 year low in labor force participation (if you recall, 1984 was when America was just beginning to fully recover from the massive 1981-1982 recession and the period of crippling stagflation that immediately preceded it) with little immediate improvement in sight. 

In other words, we may have added 1.1 million jobs in 2010, but at the same time we had over 2.2 million Americans drop out of the labor force, which is hardly anything to be excited about. 

____________________________

PS - if you really want to compare employment during 2009-2010 with employment during the Bush presidency, the overall labor force participation rate is a good place to start.  There was a decline of 1% between 2001 and 2004 (which was the inspiration for Nancy Pelosi's famous "where are the jobs, Mr. President" speech), but the rate remained relatively steady at 66% from 2004 until the end of 2008.  Since that time, the rate has declined nearly to 64%, with no up-trend visible.  Ms. Pelosi, I believe that's your cue ... 

Enhanced by Zemanta

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/41058.

Comments (4)

Don't worry, next week ther... (Below threshold)
Gmac:

Don't worry, next week there will "Unexpectedly" be an upward correction in unemployment and a downward correction in the number of new jobs created.

Let's face it, Barry has no... (Below threshold)
GarandFan:

Let's face it, Barry has no prospects for turning the economy around, so he's just going to flat out lie. My guess is that he actually believes the MSM drove the "Bush economy" into the ground with it's constant 2004-2008 drum beat of a 'faltering economy' - so by repeating Barry's lies, the MSM can push the economy up.

With an 18.9% underemployment figure, the economy isn't growing. It's stagnating.

Actually the unemployment R... (Below threshold)
Upset Old Guy:

Actually the unemployment RATE did drop, but 36,000 job hirings can't even keep up to the growth of the labor pool. So were did those tenths of a percent go? Look a little deeper, 2.8 MILLION dropped out. They just stopped looking for a job, and therefore were no longer counted against the unemployment rate.

Now, this is my question: Is that the HOPE or the CHANGE?

The "discouraged worker" wa... (Below threshold)
Jim Addison:

The "discouraged worker" was first counted in the Reagan years, and typically considered to be of critical importance when Republicans are in office. Since they started counting, the rate has always stayed within a fairly narrow range, roughly 1.3 - 1.8% of the labor force.

They don't quote the numbers in the legacy media anymore, which tells me they must be at all-time highs.




Advertisements









rightads.gif

beltwaybloggers.gif

insiderslogo.jpg

mba_blue.gif

Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile

Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links

Credits

Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login



Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy