« Little New Under The Sun | Main | Palate Cleanser: Is It Local? »

"Make me a fisher of women"

Does that title grab ya?  Good... it should... it's a nice setup for an entertainingly funny piece put up at Pathos by Max Lindenman:

Here's one little-observed fact about nice Catholic girls--by which I mean girls who are Catholic, who have sunny dispositions, and who use Humanae Vitae as a dating guide: they absolutely love to cuddle.

Granted, I've dated exactly two specimens as of this writing, so there's every chance my study suffers from sampling error. Still, it's striking that these two women, who had little in common save approximate age, niceness, Catholicism, and a predilection for the author, were both so stunningly tactile. Did they like to hold hands? Please. Walking down the street with either meant entwining your arm with hers in a way that would seem impossible for anyone with actual bones.

Lying on the couch watching Song of Bernadette on DVD, you'd find yourself wearing a head on your chest or shoulder, and fragrant tendrils of hair in your nose, before Jennifer Jones goes into her first trance. By the time she leaves Lourdes for the convent, you'd be absorbed in the type of footsie match that surely inspired Anne Sexton to write: "And I'll be your barefoot wench/For a whole week."

And because they were nice and Catholic, it would go no further.

In an essay for Slate, Tom Perrotta posits an archetype that he dubs the Sexy Puritan. This is a woman both socially conservative and attractive--ostentatiously so. He recalls attending a Silver Ring Thing event and meeting "a slender young blond woman in tight jeans and a form-fitting T-shirt" who "bragged about all the college boys who'd tried and failed to talk her into their beds." In other words, the Sexy Puritan is a god-fearing, godawful tease. Come the revolution, I assure you, Sexy Puritans will be hunted from helicopters.

Thank God she seems to be a mainly a non-Catholic type. I'm betting her kind first evolved in Dixie--where coquetry defines the culture as much as ancestor worship or red velvet cake--and migrated north with the emergence of the glitzy megachurch. My nice Catholic girls were completely different animals. Straightforward and unaffected, they sent no mixed signals, crowned their bedposts with no negative notches. In their orgies of chaste snuggle-wuggles I see evidence for a startling truth: where sexuality decreases, tenderness and sensuality increase.

Too facile? Bear with me here. I'm still trying to figure all this out.

Read the whole thing and you'll eventually stumble across the quoted title. 

It's worth it.  Especially if you're an unattached male.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/41180.

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference "Make me a fisher of women":

» Brutally Honest linked with "Make me a fisher of women"

Comments (4)

My sample size was even sma... (Below threshold)
Clancy:

My sample size was even smaller (1) and the cuddle pre-occupation holds up. But my final conclusion was the exact opposite: Pure nympho. So... i might not be the woman. Just sayin.

You know what's really grea... (Below threshold)
PIle of Pooh:

You know what's really great about nice girls? Let me know if you figure it out, because the best girlfriend I ever had was the half-psychotic stripper I dated for five years after my first divorce.

But, if you're young and still haven't figured out that it's all just a big genetic whirlpool with a double-plot gravesite at the bottom, I suppose it retains its magic for you.

Still, I'd rather not read about your "playing footsie," thanks. It's downright nauseating.

Chastity - it once was a de... (Below threshold)
Don L:

Chastity - it once was a desired virtue - today, it is loathed as an evil by the unchaste and those females who think being "in touch with their inner bitch" gives them more dignity.

I see evidence for... (Below threshold)
I see evidence for a startling truth: where sexuality decreases, tenderness and sensuality increase.

So, a clueless liberal discovers the "startling truth" that sexual restraint actually makes sex more enjoyable. I'm sure he thinks he's the first person in human history to discover this. The only question is, will he change his mind once all the cool kids find out and start calling him a prude and a hater?




Advertisements









rightads.gif

beltwaybloggers.gif

insiderslogo.jpg

mba_blue.gif

Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile

Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

tips@wizbangblog.com

Fresh Links

Credits

Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login



Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy