« From Motor City To Mullah City | Main | Weekend Caption Contest™ Winners »

The Resurrection: Myth and folly or factual cornerstone?

Coming our way via Fr. Longenecker who calls it a humdinger, Mark Shea has put up a defense of the event Christians are celebrating today the world over:

emptytomb.jpg"Jesus came to give us moral guidance, and to prove he meant business, he let himself be killed and seen after death, so we would listen and be good." Not being raised in any particular religion myself, it wasn't until later that I discovered that this view of Jesus' death and resurrection (which I heard from my grandmother) had more in common with The Day the Earth Stood Still than it did with the historic faith of Christianity. But this view of Jesus-as-Klaatu, impressing the yokels with spiritualist stunts to wow them into listening to His preachments, is but one of many "alternative" views of the resurrection of Christ. In this view, it isn't particularly important whether Jesus was raised bodily, just so long as His disciples knew He was "really alive" -- more likely as a particularly impressive ghost.

To others, it isn't important whether Jesus is alive even as a ghost so long as He "lives in the hearts of his countrymen." This is more or less the position of alleged "Christian theologians" like John Dominic Crossan, who cheerfully relates this happy news in Jesus: A Revolutionary Biography (1994):
 
What actually and historically happened to the body of Jesus can best be judged from watching how later Christian accounts slowly but steadily increased the reverential dignity of their burial accounts. But what was there at the beginning that necessitated such an intensive volume of apologetic insistence? If the Romans did not observe the Deuteronomic decree, Jesus' body would have been left on the cross for the wild beasts. And his followers, who had fled, would know that. If the Romans did observe the decree, the soldiers would have made certain Jesus was dead and then buried him themselves as part of their job. In either case, his body left on the cross or in a shallow grave barely covered with dirt and stones, the dogs were waiting. And his followers, who had fled, would know that too. Watch, then, how the horror of that brutal truth is sublimated through hope and imagination into its opposite.
 
In other words, Jesus' corpse was dog food long ago, but since the idiot-savant apostles were particularly adept at religious psychosis and making lemonade out of lemons, then we can say the Resurrection is full of "hope" in a sense intelligible only to extremely advanced theologians like Crossan.
 
Then again, there are others who solve the problem of the Resurrection by not letting Jesus die. In this view, somebody else was crucified on Good Friday (somebody who really deserved it, like Judas Iscariot), while Jesus went off to a well-earned pension someplace else. Depending on which legend or Shocking Book (e.g., Holy Blood, Holy Grail by Michael Baigent) you choose, "someplace else" could be anywhere from Japan to France. Frequently, "Jesus didn't die" scenarios go for the hearts-and-flowers conclusion favored by Hollywood, in which the retired Son of Man finally gets the girl, like Clark Kent in Superman II, and no longer has to pursue His unrewarding task of proclaiming platitudes. Typically, they pack Him off to some vineyard with Mary Magdalene, there to found a dynasty of Merovingians or something. Instead of having Him escape crucifixion entirely, some scenarios grant that He was crucified but insist that He only swooned (possibly with the help of some drugged wine) and regained consciousness later. But the central claim of all such scenarios is that Jesus didn't really die on the Cross.

There's much more and it's excellent stuff.

Read the entire piece and be better prepared to defend that which you believe or... if you're one who sits on the fence about this at all or have come to believe the mythology, read it and begin your trek toward Truth.  It's a journey many have taken.  Now may just be your time to embark.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/41468.

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Resurrection: Myth and folly or factual cornerstone?:

Comments (9)

One either believes or does... (Below threshold)
TexBob:

One either believes or does not. No need to defend either position, just pray for those who don't.

Happy Easter!

For nonbeleivers Jesus coul... (Below threshold)
retired military:

For nonbeleivers Jesus could return at Home plate in the middle of the 7th game at the world series and they would still not believe.

FOr believers no proof is required.

Believe or not. The choice ... (Below threshold)
Jeff Blogworthy:

Believe or not. The choice is yours. Either way, I will not cut your head off. This I promise.

Happy resurrection day.

Myth and folly? No, thats t... (Below threshold)
914:

Myth and folly? No, thats the last 2 and a half years.

Factual cornerstone for sure. Lets just say Jesus cannot be proven false and therefore must be considered a factual truth.

Faith is not "provable" (i.... (Below threshold)
Don L:

Faith is not "provable" (i.e.measurable) by science because it transcends the spatial temperal world (Phiolosophy 110) that's why it's called faith. That, however, in no way detracts from its truth. Those that ignore the many thousands (Fulton Sheen claims 46,000) of predictive elements in the Old Testament, are welcome to live with their rejection. Christ tells us we are either with Him or we are against Him.

The ressurection,is not to be argued, for that is surely man's greatest folly. As Christ said when His apostles asked Him to do a miracle for the non-believers - all the miracles in the world won't convince them.

As it is with the professional atheists who spend their lives fighting a God they claim doesn't exist -it really is more about "I will not serve" than it is about, "I do not believe" Even Satan belived in Christ as God and tried to get Peter to stop Him from accepting the cross.

Someday, we shall all know.

I don't necessarily believe... (Below threshold)
Timmer:

I don't necessarily believe myth and folly go hand in hand. Myth is much stronger than fact will ever be. Faith is not in wrapping your head around something, but your whole being.

I lost my faith in the Church long ago and they've done nothing over the past three decades to change that. But there is a God, Tao, Buddha, The Force, whatever you want to call It, Him, Her. And I'll take my hope and faith where ever I can find it.

Atheism is a non-prophet or... (Below threshold)
retired military:

Atheism is a non-prophet organization.

TimmerYou may have... (Below threshold)
retired military:

Timmer

You may have lost your faith in the church (or people in the church) but you kept your faith in God. That really is all that matters.

Well, okay.So you ... (Below threshold)
Verbalpaintball:

Well, okay.

So you don't believe the story. Yet, you still rely on an examination of it that was developed, what, hundreds - even thousands - of years later?

The best source we have is from the apostles - and the first one was written 25 years after the resurrection - 1 Corinthians 15.

And, while I'm a practical person and I'm not apt to believe that everything in the bible is word for word accurate (or sometimes even close), I trust in the basics. The man was possibly the son of God (and that's good enough for me), he lived by a good philosophy, and life after death would be pretty sweet.

Even though we can make predictions, even scientific one's about all of this, nobody knows for absolute certainty.

So, hey. Believe what you believe. I'll believe what I believe. And that's just fine and dandy. But don't ever assume your version of an unknown is smarter, more believable or less naive then that of someone elses.




Advertisements









rightads.gif

beltwaybloggers.gif

insiderslogo.jpg

mba_blue.gif

Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile

Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links

Credits

Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login



Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy