The woman is giving it to Obama time and time again. She's a one person opposition party:
As Governor I fought the Obama Administration's plans to cut funds for missile defense in Alaska. So imagine how appalled and surprised I was to read this article by former Clinton CIA Director James Woolsey, appropriately titled "Giving Away the Farm," concerning President Obama's latest bizarre actions relating to missile defense.
President Obama wants to give Russia our missile defense secrets because he believes that we can buy their friendship and cooperation with this taxpayer-funded gift. But giving military secrets and technologies to a rival or competitor like Russia is just plain dumb. You can't buy off Russia. And giving them advanced military technology will not create stability. What happens if Russia gives this technology (or sells it!) to other countries like Iran or China? After all, as Woolsey points out, Russia helped Iran with its missile and nuclear programs. Or what happens if an even more hardline leader comes to power in the Kremlin?
We tried buying off the Kremlin with technologies in the 1970s. That policy was a component of "detente," and the hope was that if we would share our technologies with them, they would become more peaceful. Things, of course, didn't work out that way. The Kremlin took western technologies and embarked on a massive military building program. History teaches that peace comes from American military strength. And a central component of that has always been technological superiority. Why would President Obama even dream of giving this away?
...
Why is it that President Obama seems to work so hard to give things to our enemies, while at the same time asking friends and allies like Israel to make sacrifices?
During these tough economic times when we are facing massive deficits and a competitive global economy, does President Obama really want to give away technologies that the American taxpayer paid lots of money to develop? Giving away our missile defense secrets won't make us safer. What it will do is create a situation where we are facing an arms race with ourselves. Russia gets access to our technologies, and we are forced to spend even more money because of the need to stay ahead. Does this make sense to you? Me neither. File this under "WTF."
- Sarah Palin
Some might say she's not Presidential material and I believe we'll be debating that fully soon enough but I'm telling you it's hard to find anybody that's bopping Obama upside his big-eared head as hard and as often as she is.
More power to her. Quite literally.
Permalink | Linking Blogs | Sphere: Related Content | Digg this! | FARK It!
Filed under:
Sarah Palin, WTF?
Comments (13)
one person oppo... (Below threshold)1. Posted by McGehee | June 9, 2011 1:09 PM | Score: 4 (6 votes cast)
1. Posted by McGehee | June 9, 2011 1:09 PM |
Score: 4 (6 votes cast)
Posted on June 9, 2011 13:09
2. Posted by GarandFan | June 9, 2011 1:13 PM | Score: 7 (7 votes cast)
But...but...but....Barry is "The Smartest Man in the World"! He's accomplished sooooooooo much in foreign affairs in the last two years. Like, ah....ummmmmmmm.......er......uh......
2. Posted by GarandFan | June 9, 2011 1:13 PM |
Score: 7 (7 votes cast)
Posted on June 9, 2011 13:13
3. Posted by TexBob | June 9, 2011 1:13 PM | Score: 8 (8 votes cast)
Treason. No other word for it.
3. Posted by TexBob | June 9, 2011 1:13 PM |
Score: 8 (8 votes cast)
Posted on June 9, 2011 13:13
4. Posted by ODA315 | June 9, 2011 1:25 PM | Score: 7 (7 votes cast)
Looks like a beauty queen,sounds like Reagan.
Ummmm, Ummmmm, Ummmm
Todd, you are a lucky boy indedd.
4. Posted by ODA315 | June 9, 2011 1:25 PM |
Score: 7 (7 votes cast)
Posted on June 9, 2011 13:25
5. Posted by Gladius | June 9, 2011 1:30 PM | Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
Ya, I'll bet Obama is one lib. that dosen't get a boner from her.
5. Posted by Gladius | June 9, 2011 1:30 PM |
Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
Posted on June 9, 2011 13:30
6. Posted by Sep14 | June 9, 2011 1:36 PM | Score: 8 (8 votes cast)
Impeachment is to good for this clown.
6. Posted by Sep14 | June 9, 2011 1:36 PM |
Score: 8 (8 votes cast)
Posted on June 9, 2011 13:36
7. Posted by DaveD | June 9, 2011 1:36 PM | Score: 6 (6 votes cast)
Julius and Ethel Rosenberg.
7. Posted by DaveD | June 9, 2011 1:36 PM |
Score: 6 (6 votes cast)
Posted on June 9, 2011 13:36
8. Posted by recovered liberal democrat | June 9, 2011 1:59 PM | Score: 8 (8 votes cast)
I'm waiting for Romney to agree with Paddy O'bamalala on this also.
8. Posted by recovered liberal democrat | June 9, 2011 1:59 PM |
Score: 8 (8 votes cast)
Posted on June 9, 2011 13:59
9. Posted by jim m | June 9, 2011 2:54 PM | Score: 9 (9 votes cast)
The difference between obama and Carter?
Carter only kissed our enemy, Brezhnev, whereas obama bends over for our enemies.
9. Posted by jim m | June 9, 2011 2:54 PM |
Score: 9 (9 votes cast)
Posted on June 9, 2011 14:54
10. Posted by epador | June 9, 2011 4:22 PM | Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
I am (un)impressed by the number of elite flaming her on Facebook for using WTF. 'Course they don't realize it really stands for Where's Todd's FAMAS62?
10. Posted by epador | June 9, 2011 4:22 PM |
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on June 9, 2011 16:22
11. Posted by Jeff Blogworthy | June 9, 2011 7:44 PM | Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
I'm disappointed. Where are all the dickheads to defend the indefensible?
11. Posted by Jeff Blogworthy | June 9, 2011 7:44 PM |
Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on June 9, 2011 19:44
12. Posted by Idahoser | June 10, 2011 2:49 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
"She's a one person opposition party"
'bout time we had one.
12. Posted by Idahoser | June 10, 2011 2:49 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on June 10, 2011 14:49
13. Posted by Jolene | June 11, 2011 5:25 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
hmmm not an ordinary article, i have found it interesting to myself. thank you so much!!! have met same info ">ставки футбол an this iste, think it would be interesting for you.
13. Posted by Jolene | June 11, 2011 5:25 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on June 11, 2011 05:25