We Support The Troops — So What If We Don't Know What They Look Like

dncvets2.jpg

Michelle Malkin has a hilarious post about the Democrats’ efforts to portray themselves as a party that supports military veterans. What is so funny about it is that along with their “We Support Vets” campaign they ran a picture of a soldier from Canada (in the picture above in the beret).

Michelle also reports that LGF found the source of the photo and it appears that a badge on the beret was removed with Photoshop.

I’m with Blackfive on this one: “how screwed up must you be to post about how much your party supports the troops, but not know who your troops are? ‘Embarassing’ hardly begins to describe this error.”

It is embarrassing to post a picture of another country’s vets as your own, but I think the picture of all the Democrats is almost as strange. The people in the picture pumping their fists in the air look like they just won the lottery (or since they are Democrats, just got some tax cuts repealed), rather than voicing support for their troops and vets. Check out the guy in the bottom left corner. When is the last time you saw a Democrat look that excited about supporting our troops?

Update: Michelle has updated to note the DNC has removed the soldier’s picture and replaced it with an American flag. A few readers noticed that the flag looks like it has been burned. It looks that way to me, too. I don’t know if that is the picture I would have chosen if trying to distract voters from the flag burners supporting my party.

I think I have figured out where the picture of the people above came from — a Democrat audience in a showing of the Bush assassination movie. Actually a commenter, Dave, says that LGF reader Cattt discovered it is a stock photo.

Update II: Hot Air says the DNC didn’t do the photoshopping themselves.

Laura Lee Donoho thought the picture of the people they chose to use was strange, too.

]]>< ![CDATA[

Update III: It just dawned on me that if the Democrats needed to know what a veteran of the U.S. military looked like, they could have just asked me. I pulled this one out of my wedding album:
wedding3.jpg

Whoops!
Bait and switch at the Boston Globe

58 Comments

  1. Jason October 8, 2006
  2. Steve of Norway October 8, 2006
  3. Semanticleo October 8, 2006
  4. 914 October 8, 2006
  5. DaveD October 8, 2006
  6. Semanticleo October 8, 2006
  7. Rory October 8, 2006
  8. John Simpson October 8, 2006
  9. Dave October 8, 2006
  10. Lee October 8, 2006
  11. smartguy October 8, 2006
  12. Rory October 8, 2006
  13. chuck October 8, 2006
  14. Palmateer October 8, 2006
  15. cactusrose October 8, 2006
  16. Jason October 8, 2006
  17. Jason October 8, 2006
  18. Orbit Rain October 8, 2006
  19. Steve of Norway October 8, 2006
  20. Rory October 8, 2006
  21. S.A B. October 8, 2006
  22. Faith+1 October 8, 2006
  23. Scrapiron October 8, 2006
  24. Lee October 8, 2006
  25. epador October 8, 2006
  26. RGM October 8, 2006
  27. SCSIwuzzy October 8, 2006
  28. Lorie Byrd October 8, 2006
  29. Steve of Norway October 8, 2006
  30. jp2 October 8, 2006
  31. Xennady October 8, 2006
  32. muirgeo October 8, 2006
  33. muirgeo October 8, 2006
  34. Xennady October 8, 2006
  35. Zelsdorf Ragshaft III October 8, 2006
  36. gregdn October 8, 2006
  37. Lee October 8, 2006
  38. muirgeo October 8, 2006
  39. Les Nessman October 8, 2006
  40. 914 October 8, 2006
  41. spurwing plover October 8, 2006
  42. 914 October 8, 2006
  43. Lee October 8, 2006
  44. Zelsdorf Ragshaft III October 8, 2006
  45. Syntax October 8, 2006
  46. Lee October 8, 2006
  47. Xennady October 8, 2006
  48. Xennady October 8, 2006
  49. jhow66 October 8, 2006
  50. Mitchell October 8, 2006