« You Know Kerry's in Trouble When... | Main | Checking In »

The New York (Behind the) Times

Yesterday The New York Times (The Paper Of Record, "All The News That's Fit To Print") published an unsigned editorial calling for the abolition of the Electoral College. The more cynical among you might question the timing of this opinion, as John Kerry's numbers drop lower and lower, but instead I just prefer to think of them to finally catching up on Your Humble Correspondent. I seem to recall writing back in May that in the three and a half years since the last Presidential election, despite all the screams that "Gore won the popular vote," and such, not one credible source had put forth a serious challenge to the Electoral College System. And four weeks ago I posted another piece that took a hard look at just how absurd the rules of the Electoral College could be twisted.

And now here comes the Old Gray Lady of Journalism (not to be confused with Helen Thomas), calling for the abolition of the Electoral College without even taking a single sentence to describe just how that would be done. Because the Electoral College is established in the Constitution (Article II, Section I), it would take a Constitutional amendment to change that. (Note to the Times: unlike gay marriage, you can't get 4/7 of a state supreme court or a rogue mayor or two to overturn it .) And according to the Constitution, an amendment must be proposed by either 2/3 of both houses of Congress or 2/3 of all state legislatures, and then approved by 3/4 of state legislatures or state conventions. No judges allowed.

So, just what does the Times think will happen when their legions of followers hear this clarion call to action? I don't know what they expect, but the cynic in me thinks they're laying the groundwork to challenge the legitimacy of a second Bush term and undermine his effectiveness. But then, I'm just one guy with a copy of the Constitution at hand and a good memory of the Times' shameful history.

Ah, how the mighty have fallen.



Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The New York (Behind the) Times:

» A Stitch in Haste linked with Electoral College: An Update

Comments (4)

Not only do I question thei... (Below threshold)

Not only do I question their timing, but the Times was for it before they were against it.

Question: If Bush was selec... (Below threshold)

Question: If Bush was selected NOT elected, can he run again in 2008?

The Electoral College is on... (Below threshold)

The Electoral College is one of the three best things about the Constitution - it's the cornerstone for protecting minority rights.

Hmm. If anyone is intereste... (Below threshold)

Hmm. If anyone is interested in different ways of doing elections, you might find this interesting: http://proheretic.com/staticpages/index.php/egov1 .

It isn't something you could really implement in the USA, but it's something I came up with when contemplating the problems with various systems.






Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile


Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links


Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login

Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy