« Going deeper into the hole | Main | Almost as Bad as Dead Voters »

Time for a little R&R: A contractual obligation piece (4 of 7)

(This is the 4th in a series of postings "bought and paid for" by contributors to tsunami relief, as proffered here. This one is for Scott, who really, REALLY made me work for it. Thanks heaps, Scott.)

I recently had some major computer problems, and had to do a restore on my system. Somehow in the process, I managed to "recover" a posting I won't write until the summer of 2008. It's an interesting peek into the future, so I thought I'd share it here.


Well, Rummie did it to me AGAIN. You'd think I'd get tired of being wrong when it comes to predicting his actions, but apparently I don't. Let's see just how well I've done tracking the progress of the Republican nominee for president:

1) When he survived the terrorist attack back in 2005 that claimed the life of his wife, I said he'd stay on as Secretary of Defense, out of the feeling of duty and the need to "get back" at the terrorists. Instead, he resigned.

2) When he resigned and went into seclusion, I said we'd seen the last of him and wrote a glowing send-off to "this man who has paid for his public service with his dearest blood." I was actually writing a first draft of his obituary, which I expected I'd need within a year or so.

3) When he emerged from his "exile" and announced he was running for president, I said the American people would never vote for a man in his 70's, especially one who was making the "war on terror" a personal crusade. But apparently his quiet appeal for "one last chance to serve his country" and "keep more Americans from suffering the kind of personal loss I have felt" touched a lot of people.

4) I said that the other candidates (McCain, Frist, Guiliani, etc.) would fight to the bitter end for the nomination. In my defense, I don't think any other pundits foresaw the mass concession of last April that left Rumsfeld the only serious candidate in the field.

And now we come to my latest prediction. I said that Rumsfeld would tap Condoleezza Rice (to reach outside the "white male" demographic that has held the Executive branch from day one) or Guiliani (another "victim" of terrorism who has shown a willingness and ability to fight back). But once again Rumsfeld made me look stupid.

Who the hell would have thought, after Ted Kennedy, Michael Dukakis, Paul Tsongas, and (most recently) John Kerry, the Republicans would pick ANOTHER Massachusetts politician for the national ticket? But, in retrospect, Mitt Romney is a fantastic complement to Rumsfeld. His youthful appearance, his social moderation (bordering on liberalism), his genteel manner, all serve to counterbalance Rumsfeld. On the other hand, both come with that certain "gravitas" and quiet integrity. Romney has actually managed to do some pretty good things in Massachusetts, despite their legislature being completely owned lock, stock, and barrel by the Democrats.

Rumsfeld and Romney. Damn, I never saw that coming. But I can hear the chants already.

"R for Rumsfeld! R for Romney! R for Republican! R for right now!"

I still worry, though. I don't think this is the right ticket to beat the Clinton/Obama juggernaut. But, as I said above, I'm getting used to being wrong.


Comments (6)

Wow, Rumsfeld is in for a r... (Below threshold)

Wow, Rumsfeld is in for a rough future...

OK, then, wise guy, let's s... (Below threshold)
Jay Tea:

OK, then, wise guy, let's see YOU come up with a scenario that makes a Rumsfeld candidacy even remotely plausible.

Seriously, ou really made me work for that donation, Scott, and it was actually fun. Thanks for the donation and the topic.

Three more to go... and damn, I've used up the easy ones.


Good try, but I still don't... (Below threshold)
Just Me:

Good try, but I still don't buy Rumsfeld for president or VP anytime soon (okay never).

Bite your blogging tounge, ... (Below threshold)

Bite your blogging tounge, man!!

- Even if 3/4's of the elec... (Below threshold)

- Even if 3/4's of the electorate went to sleep for that election cycle and he somehow got the nomination he'd get slaughtered.... Why you ask... simple.... wait for it.....

(He'd go with too few precinct workers on election day.....)

Hey, sometimes you have to ... (Below threshold)

Hey, sometimes you have to go to vote not with the precinct workers you wish you had, but with the precinct workers you do have...

I think I'll take you up on that J. Assuming of course that life lets up for a second or three.






Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile


Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links


Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login

Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy