« Runaway Bride Could Have Been Looking For Old Flame | Main | A quick parenting quiz »

Bipartisan asshattery

There have been a lot of allegations tossed around of voter fraud, voter suppression, and all sorts of irregularities from last November's presidential election. But while all the verified cases have gotten short shrift in the media (here's a hint: when there have been guilty pleas, there might be a story there), the unfounded ones have gotten all the attention. And oddly enough, it's Democrats who are currently facing jail time, while those who accuse the Republicans are using statistics, exit polls, and anecdotes to buttress their charges.

But that's not to say the GOP's hands are clean. We have a bit of a voting scandal unraveling here in New Hampshire, and it's heading for court. But this one is a bit older -- it's from the 2002 election.

Every election, both parties set up phone banks to call up voters and remind them to go vote, even offering them rides if necessary. Such "get out the vote" programs are an old and honored tradition.

But back in 2002, a couple bigwigs in the state GOP got the clever idea of jamming the Democrats' phone lines to keep their vote total down. They hired a telemarketing company to repeatedly call their lines, tying them up.

Only problem was that it's illegal.

Now the former Northeast political director of the national Republican Senatorial Committee, one James Tobin, is going on trial in Concord. And his lawyer is trying out a novel tactic of his own: He wants all jurors screened for their political beliefs, and Democrats excluded. His theory is that since Democrats were the intended victims of the alleged crime, they would be prejudiced against his client.

Presumably, if he gets his way, the prosecution will ask for all Republicans to be excluded as well, as they were the intended beneficiaries of the act. If that's the case, then only registered Independents will sit on the jury. And lucky for them Independents outnumber both Democrats and Republicans in New Hampshire.

But that's a dangerous fallacy. That's the same sort of misguided logic that has people up in arms over Diebold behind some grand conspiracy, simply because 1) they make most of the voting machines, and 2) their leaders are Republicans. It's presuming that simply because one belongs to a party, and even might be active in it, that one's political leanings will win out over everything else -- including principles and respect for the law.

I can see excluding Democratic activists, elected officials, and employees of the party from the jury pool. But I have enough faith in New Hampshire Democrats (of whom I was one until last December) that they can and will put that aside and see this is not a partisan issue. What Mr. Tobin allegedly did was not an assault on the Democratic party, but the (small-d) democratic system. And that must not be tolerated.

Comments (6)

Well said.... (Below threshold)

Well said.

"But while all the verif... (Below threshold)

"But while all the verified cases have gotten short shrift in the media (here's a hint: when there have been guilty pleas, there might be a story there), the unfounded ones have gotten all the attention."

Exactimundo! I've been keeping track of charges, convictions, and findings. Here's the latest, with links to older posts. In 2004, every verified instance of vote fraud or election shenanigans has been by Democrats.

Let him rot.Of cou... (Below threshold)
I'm completely with you on ... (Below threshold)
Cousin Dave:

I'm completely with you on this, Jay. If we are going to accuse the other side of operating a house of ill repute, we'd better keep our own house in order. Everybody hates a hypocrite.

AUUUGH MY BROTHER >> COME ... (Below threshold)
spelling assassin:

AUUUGH MY BROTHER >> COME BACK TO THE DEMACRATIC FOLD>> NO NO >> COME BACK>> WE NEED YOU>> OH wait.. I'm an independant anyway.. .. (with reguards to Gilda Radner.. "NEVER MIND")

Old news.Anybody w... (Below threshold)

Old news.

Anybody who paid any attention at all to the election knew the democrats were purposely thwarting voters from having more than two choices in the election. They filed one frivilous lawsuit after another in most of the states trying to prevent Ralph Nader from getting on the ballot.

They are the Anti-Democratic party.

It should be noted however that the 2000 election was the first time in the history of this nation that the electoral ignored the majority of voters and chose Bush.

Both patsies (I mean parties) are equally guilty of election and voter manipulation. It is a well documented fact that Governor Jeb Bush decided to arbitrarilly throw thousands of registered voters off the rolls to help secure the Florida Electorate. And I'm not referring to the ones questioned during the two weeks following the election.

The responsibility for fraud and deception lies with both parties equally.






Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile


Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links


Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login

Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy