« Weekend Caption Contest™ Winners | Main | Crazy from the heat »

Making a Palestinian omelet

Recently, the Arab News featured a story where the Palestinian Authority's Foreign Minister, Nasser Al-Kidwa (who used to be the Palestinians' "Permanent Observer" to the United Nations and, I am told, is Yassir Arafat's nephew and a virulent anti-Semite, who used to regularly spew vile anti-Jewish screeds there), said that the PA will not be disarming the various and sundry armed groups currently waging their terrorist war against Israel.

This should put the final nail into the coffin of the Road Map to Peace. Those agreements laid out a process for the end of the Israel-Palestine conflict and the eventual creation of an independent state, and were welcomed by all parties back in 2002. And three years later, Israel has made strides to every single obligation upon it, while the Palestinians have hemmed and hawed, cheated and retreated, and now are openly renouncing the one key element of the first phase: an end to violence.

A lot of people have given up hope (or never had any hope) for a truly free, independent, and peaceful Palestinian state. While I understand that, and am often tempted to agree with them, I don't want to give up hope just yet. I want so much to see the conflict end, and the poor, suffering people of the Middle East to finally live free.

With that in mind, I think it's time someone gave the Palestinians a history lesson.

What they are trying to do is something that is very rare in history, but has happened before. They are trying to create a free nation out of an occupied territory by the use of diverse militia groups loosely united in a common cause. The problem with that is while these groups have a general agreement on getting the other guys out, they each have their own ideas about what sort of government should replace it -- and what part each of their groups will play in setting it up and running it.

Ironically, from a historical perspective, the results (if they are successful) are pretty good. Two nations today came from such roots, and things worked out pretty well for them.

In the late 18th century, the United States won its independence from Great Britain. The initial government -- the Articles of Confederation -- were the result. They resulted in a very weak central government, and no standing military. Several militias and veterans' groups didn't agree with some of the way the government was doing things, and took up arms as a result. It wasn't until Shays' Rebellion and the Whiskey Rebellion were put down that the notion that the federal government of the United States of America was here to stay.

In the middle of the 20th Century, Jews fought fiercely for the re-creation of the ancient Jewish homeland against the British occupation (I'm sensing a theme here). Numerous groups, gangs, militias, and other movements each fought their own battles against the British, sometimes cooperating, sometimes competing. But when the British finally did pull out and the modern state of Israel was created, several of those groups did not agree with the government that was created. They posed a credible threat to the stability of the nascent state, a threat that was finally ended when Jew indeed took up arms against Jew and put down the dissidents, culminating in the attack on the Altalena.

The first obligation of any nation is to be responsible for the events that occur within its borders. Dissent is to be tolerated, even embraced, but armed dissent must be suppressed. The existence of private military forces are a grave threat to any nation, especially one newly born from violence. The United States Constitution even makes it clear -- "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed." The right of the people to keep and bear arms is critical to freedom from tyranny, but they must not organize into private armies without government regulation. A well-armed populace is a sheathed sword against tyranny, but a private military is a knife to the throat of a government.

The Palestinians, if they are truly interested in becoming a free and independent state, need to look at these two examples and realize that Hamas, Islamic Jihad, the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade (whom I thought had renamed themselves the "Yassir Arafat Martyrs Brigade") have long outlived their usefulness (granting them that they ever had any, which I don't think they did) and must be disarmed at the least, most likely disbanded, and crushed if necessary.

It all boils down to a simple question: what do the Palestinians want more -- to create a nation of their own, or to destroy Israel? Golda Meir once sadly predicted that "peace will come when the Arabs love their children more than they hate us." Despite all the evidence to the contrary, I still hope that time is near.

(Thanks to Laurence Simon for some key tidbits that helped me firm up the Israeli history and the background on Nasser Al-Kidwa. He gave me the key info I needed to track down the full details.)

Comments (10)

I always assume that that t... (Below threshold)

I always assume that that the civilian Palestinian population serves as a convenient bulwark behind which these jihadist organizations can launch their attacks against Israel. I also assume that a significant number of Palestinians do love their children more than they hate Israel. But I am not so sure that is true of the children themselves who have even less and no apparent future ahead of them. The restlessness of youth can be channeled for good or bad - and in the Middle East it is being used by the jihadist organizations to recruit the martyrs of anti-Zionism and anti-Western ideology. They cannot see that people like Arafat have robbed them blind of most of the material welfare which has been passed their way by a number of countries including the United States. Maybe I am naive but the Palestinians sit directly shoulder to shoulder real estate-wise with the Israelis. The Israelis have taken a desert and turned in into a productive peace of land. The rest of the Arab world will make sure the Palestinians never achieve that. They are serving their purpose for the pan-Arab anti-Israel agenda.

The touchy feely among us d... (Below threshold)
Just Me:

The touchy feely among us don't want to hear it, but sadly I think the Palestinians woudl rather destroy Israel than to have a valid self supporting State.

There are plenty of Palesti... (Below threshold)

There are plenty of Palestinians that wanted to work towards peace and end the war, it is just that they tend to get executed as collaberators keeping the Palestinians with only the corrupt and the violent leadership.

I really do not think the war can end because the so called Islamic states will not let it. Iraq is out of Palestine but Iran wants it to remain a front line against Israel and even if it stopped, Saudi Arabia will still be donating money for bombs and the Palestinian terrorist family package.

Without going after the money and support like we go after Al Queda, it can't end.

The Palestinians as well as... (Below threshold)

The Palestinians as well as the rest of the Arab world will never want peace with Israel. They have been taught since day one to hate and despise their Jewish neighbors which have every right to exist as they do. Read your Bible and see that is has been that way since the beginning of time. As long as this world allows the Palestinians to teach their children that is a-ok to blow yourself up and take a few Israelis with you and all Arab nations to support the breeding of terrorists than their will never be peace, just pieces.

Not only do they get killed... (Below threshold)

Not only do they get killed as collaborators, but they get the charges altered on them so the lefties think that a few murderers have been killed. Just like this past weekend when four got rubbed out.

But they KNOW it's a bunch of collaborators being offed.

Responsibility comes with b... (Below threshold)

Responsibility comes with being a recognized state. Responsibility they don't want. What these militants want is a closed society, free from prying eyes and ears when human rights are called into question. That's what most of the Middle East had for centuries. Remember how we used to call Middle Eastern countries "mysterious" a long time ago? Most of us thought it was just because they enjoyed privacy and valued traditon. Little did we know exactly why. The oppression, babarism and abuses reigned freely as a result. The Palestinian militants as well as the Middle Eastern dictators, big and small, long for those days and they want them restored.

So yes, "force" is all they'll understand.

"Force is all they'll under... (Below threshold)

"Force is all they'll understand"
You're beginning to sound like the jihadists you claim to despise.
This comes right out of the OBL handbook, Florida Oyster.

Don't put words in my mouth... (Below threshold)

Don't put words in my mouth, Gordon. When I say force, I do not mean blasting away with machine guns or blowing one's self to smithereens. Give me a break.

As Golda Meir (Israeli Prim... (Below threshold)
Jameel Rashid:

As Golda Meir (Israeli Primie Minister in early 70's) once said:

"We'll only have peace with the Arabs when the love their children more than they hate us."

The Altelena was a tragic incident in Israel's history, which showed Menachem Begin's moral superiority over Yitzchak Rabin. The Israeli left sides with Rabin, and believe that the "Altelena" solution is the best for everyone.

The moral superiority of the Israeli right, doesn't mean that they know how to rule...which has always been their big undoing.


Jameel...hanging out at the Muqata.

The reason that the state s... (Below threshold)
Sabba Hillel:

The reason that the state survived was that Menachem Begin refused to allow his militia to retaliate for the Altalena and insisted on joining the state. Only when such moral courage is shown will a state survive.






Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile


Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links


Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login

Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy