« DailyKos Turns On It's Conspiracy-Obsessed Members | Main | That is What Poverty Looks Like »

D.C. Confidential

In today's Washington Post op-ed page, David Ignatius bemoans the poor choice of making a stand for confidential sources in the Plame fight and endorses a federal shield law for members of the media.

His piece is solid, noting that source-journalist privilege has always been about a balancing test -- would releasing a given source's identity serve the public interest? And in conclusion, he calls for journalists to show discretion about when they're going to pick their fights over anonymous sources and journalistic privilege.

But I would go one further: Journalists need to re-evaluate the extension of anonymity to sources. Should anonymity be extended to a government spokesperson? To a group of generals giving a briefing on the upcoming year's defense appropriations? To a political operative who is smearing the other campaign? To a whistleblower? To a whistleblower who just wants revenge for not being promoted?

The question for journalists is not merely whether to defend the privilege, but also whether that privilege should be invoked in the first place.


Listed below are links to weblogs that reference D.C. Confidential:

» Outside The Beltway linked with Daily Kos Purge of the Crazies

Comments (6)

Judging fromm the obsolete ... (Below threshold)

Judging fromm the obsolete press performance for the last several years they do evaluate the importance of the story before using confidential sources. Rathergate, the Plame Blame Game, and all the other instances of attacks on the right show that they decide if there's a chance it'll hurt the right it qualifies. Just one of the many reasons nobody but the left believes them. The reason they are obsolete.

So how do we tell an annony... (Below threshold)

So how do we tell an annonymous source from an imaginary one?

Billl, even the most season... (Below threshold)

Billl, even the most seasoned broadcaster has trouble with this one, just ask Dan Rather.

And how do we tell a journa... (Below threshold)

And how do we tell a journalist from a blogger?

Bloggers admit their mistak... (Below threshold)

Bloggers admit their mistakes on the front page.

In fact, if there were absolutely going to have to be a bloggers' code of ethics, it should consist of only that one rule.

OK, I’m pretty much with yo... (Below threshold)

OK, I’m pretty much with you on that one, McGehee.

But that eliminates people like Kos and Paul.

So should they just not be protected?






Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile


Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links


Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login

Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy