« What's Your Favorite Unix/Linux Server Distro? And why? | Main | Morning Notes »

The perpetual victims

In the wake of the London bombings, there has been yet more talk about identifying and fighting terrorism. And one of the places I went to get some perspective was Arab News.

Over there, I found an opinion piece by one Hassan Yassin.

I lack the knowledge, resources, and time to give this load of codswallop the full Fisking it deserves, but a few things come to mind:

From the dawn of the 20th century Arab dreams and promises have been betrayed. The Franco-British division of the Middle East, the crushing of Arab independence movements, the creation of the State of Israel and the ensuing wars and occupation are only some of the impossible circumstances that Arabs had to face. Arab land, it seems, has been occupied ever since the collapse of the Ottoman Empire. The authoritarian regimes that emerged after independence were as much a reaction to as a continuation of these injustices.

Boo freaking hoo. The 20th Century wasn't exactly days of wine and roses for anyone. Here's a little hint: life is tough. You can deal with it, or you can get hung up and bitch about it. And blaming the West for first coming in, then leaving? What the hell do you want?

The conditions which Arabs, especially Iraqis and Palestinians, face are often desperate and extreme. Every day they are confronted with humiliating images, whether from Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo or from Israeli-occupied Palestine. Not only are their lives threatened by extremists, they are also aware that every day they may die by the nervous trigger-finger of a soldier who has learned little about their culture or by what Americans so perfunctorily call "collateral damage."

Every day Arabs do far worse things to other Arabs than Westerners do to them in Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo, or "Israeli-occupied Palestine." The only difference is that we have a free press and an open society, where people are free to speak about such things. Are you saying that if we merely kept such things quiet, like Arab governments do, it'd be OK?

And note how Mr. Yassin blends together those who are killed deliberately with those who are killed by accident. While he has a point -- to those killed, it really doesn't matter who killed them -- the lumping together of terrorists and non-terrorists is a grave insult to our troops, and a tacit sanction of the terrorists.

We must bring an end to these injustices, to these endless and senseless conflicts. What is more, the solutions have been there all the while. On the Arab-Israeli conflict, agreed documents outlining a just peace already exist. In the case of the Taba agreement there was 99 percent agreement between parties, along with the support of a US president.

The only problem is that the Taba Agreement is dead. DEAD. Clinton attempted to force it down the throats of both sides. Israel's Ehud Barak accepted it, but the Israeli people were so upset they voted him out of office. Yassir Arafat also rejected it, and the Palestinian people were so upset about it, they voted him out of office, too.

Whoops, my mistake. Arafat, once elected 1997, never held a followup election, as required by law (his term was supposed to be 2 years). He kept finding excuses and rationales for holding on to power, in perfect accord with the Cold War Communist tactic of "one man, one vote, one time."

One of the main reasons that the Taba deal fell apart was that they had no explicit language regarding terrorism. Both sides made vague pledges to "stop terrorism," but there was nothing concrete. That's why Bush put forward the Road Map, which had specific conditions and requirements for stopping terrorism. The Palestinians eagerly signed on to it, and then blithely ignored that little provision.

OK, now I see it. The core of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is that the Palestinians simply want to be free to live their lives the way that they wish, and the Israelis are brutally preventing them from living out their dream. And that dream is to kill more and more Israelis until they are all dead or leave the region.

How insensitive of them.

Comments (6)

A fine job.... (Below threshold)

A fine job.

Hmmm.It's evident ... (Below threshold)


It's evident that one of the main problems for both muslims *and* western liberals is a desire to treat muslims as if they were children. Adults tolerate behavior in children that would result in a bloody nose if an adult tried it.

Frankly it's past time to treat these people as adults. If anybody advocates killing Americans, assassinate him. If anybody advocates attacking America, assassinate him. If anybody successfully attacks America, kill him and his family to three generations in every direction.

Tell you what. If you told the tribal elders that if they have a terrorist in their tribe that attacks America, and that would result in the utter extinction of that tribe. You'd see this terrorism shit end toot-F-ing-sweet.

"Arab land, it seems, ha... (Below threshold)

"Arab land, it seems, has been occupied ever since the collapse of the Ottoman Empire. "

Since the collapse of the Ottoman Empire?

If Yassin wants to call the Turks "Arabs", he's perfectly free to do so. But I'd prefer that he didn't do it whilst I'm around; I don't want his blood spattered on my clothes.

If I wanted to be snide, I ... (Below threshold)

If I wanted to be snide, I would say that most of the Arab world's problems stem from the fact that they haven't even reached the 12th century yet, much less the 21st.

But I don't want to be snide....today.

besides which, how the hell... (Below threshold)

besides which, how the hell does he think the ottomans got their empire? a good portion of it was taken from *drumroll*... europeans!

As Dr. Phil would ask, "... (Below threshold)
Ron Wright:

As Dr. Phil would ask, "Now how is that working out for you?"

Perhaps their ideology just plain sucks -


Now let me get this correctly. Who started the who victim shackdown bus in the first place. Was it Ara the rat who was taking money from both us and the Sadis, pocketed the money and never really passed it to his pals, and used Islmaofascism to have the slum dwellers in the refugee camps to become bombs? Or perhaps it was Jessie Jackson and Al Sharpton they seem to do a good job hustling around the country shaking down industry under the guise of victims and diversity?

My answer is why have the Israelis been able to prosper in the same area. Could it be their ideology just plain sucks.

Gee as Dr. Phil would say, "how's that working out for you?" Perhaps a change of tactics would help and get all the thieves out of the gov't who pocket all the money.

If you to win this war go over to Roger L. Simon's for these two pieces:

RLS Link


RLS Link






Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile


Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links


Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login

Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy