« Ted Kennedy And "Youthful Indiscretion" | Main | Wizbang Podcast #4 is up! »

Massachusetts Justice and other oxymorons

Earlier today, I wrote about this story in the Boston Herald. At that point, I focused on the irony of a gang member and twice-acquitted alleged murdere who fled Boston for North Carolina, only to be shot and crippled in a drive-by shooting.

But looking further into the story, we get a few details on Marquis' Nelson's prior history, and boy oh boy is it enlightening about the Massachusetts criminal justice system.

In December 2000, Nelson was acquitted of killing a 21-year-old man for the unforgiveable sin of refusing to surrender his cell phone, despite the testimony of eyewitnesses. And in December 2004, four years to the day of that acquittal, a second jury found him not guilty in a drive-by shooting that missed its target and instead killed a 10-year-old girl. That trial was marked by audience members showing up wearing "STOP SNITCHING" T-shirts and the post-trial discovery that five of the jurors had lied about not having criminal records that would have excluded them from serving -- including one juror who had an outstanding arrest warrant, yet strolled into and out of court every day of the trial.

That little incident started the practice of doing background checks on all jurors in Massachusetts -- something that should have been done years ago.

Once again, I'm reminded that if I ever feel the urge to commit a crime, the smartest thing I could do would be to wander down across the state line and do it there.

And if, by some miracle, I am caught, I'll just claim to be an illegal alien.

Comments (4)

Jay, Were any of t... (Below threshold)
Corky Boyd:


Were any of the jurors who falsified their backgrounds, penalized?

I went to school in Greensb... (Below threshold)

I went to school in Greensboro, NC and all I can say is he must have really pissed somebody off if he got shot in a drive by there. They have crime like all cities, a shooting of that nature is unusual.

"That little incident start... (Below threshold)

"That little incident started the practice of doing background checks on all jurors in Massachusetts -- something that should have been done years ago."

Yes they should do background checks, but they should also call those people to jury duty anyway. Then they should arrest them if they show up.

Sounds like they were just ... (Below threshold)

Sounds like they were just going with the jury of your peers concept.






Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile


Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links


Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login

Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy