« Haditha Debate To Air On Cable and Internet at 9 p.m. | Main | A historic election? »

Afghan Parliament Demands the Arrest of US Soldiers Involved in Truck Accident


The members of the Afghan parliament seem to have forgotten how they came into their positions - through the sacrifices of the American military who ousted the Taliban, allowing their government to be created. Today, the Afghan parliament has issued a resolution calling for the arrest of the US soldiers involved in the truck accident even though the investigation into what exactly happened isn't complete.

Afghanistan's parliament has passed a resolution demanding the arrest of U.S. soldiers involved in a deadly car crash.

Afghan legislators passed the non-binding resolution late Tuesday, a day after the violent riots swept through the capital.

The parliament's deputy speaker, Mohamamd Arif Noorzai says the people responsible for the deadly accident that sparked the violence should be handedfor firing on over to local authorities and prosecuted.

The riots erupted Monday moments after a U.S. military truck reportedly lost control and slammed into several cars, killing at least one person.

The accident attracted a massive crowd. Within minutes protesters started throwing rocks and hurling abuse at the U.S. soldiers. Shots were fired and at least one person was killed. Rumors soon circulated that the U.S. troops were responsible.

U.S. military spokesman Colonel Tom Collins repeated earlier claims that American forces only fired their weapons in self-defense.

The UK Times Online is also covering the story:

Today, Colonel Tom Collins said a preliminary investigation suggested that the US troops had reacted reasonably: "Our initial investigation ... shows fire came from the crowd, and our soldiers used their weapons to defend themselves," he told journalists in Kabul.

Colonel Collins said that video footage showed US troops firing a mounted machine gun over the heads of the crowd but he could not say whether any other shots were fired at Afghan civilians and who fired first. "Our investigation is still looking into this," he said.

"Just because coalition soldiers weren't hurt or injured doesn't mean there wasn't imminent danger. Deadly intent on the part of the aggressors can be a rock caving in the side of your head. Our soldiers felt threatened."

The American attempt to smooth over the violence differed sharply to a motion passed by a closed session of the Afghan parliament yesterday.

Saleh Mohammed Saljuqi, an assistant to the parliamentary speaker, told the Associated Press today that legislators had asked the Government to prosecute those responsible for the crash and ensuing riots.

"Those responsible for the accident on Monday should be handed over to Afghan legal authorities," Mr Saljuqi cited the motion as saying.

A US military spokeswoman, Lt. Tamara D. Lawrence, said she had not seen the motion and declined to comment. Earlier, Colonel Collins said the lorry driver was not under arrest or suspected of any wrongdoing. He said the likeliest cause of the crash was a failure of the truck's brakes.

Reuters reports:

Afghanistan's parliament has called for the prosecution of any U.S. soldier responsible for a truck crash that killed at least five Afghans on Monday and sparked the worst anti-U.S. riots in Kabul since the fall of the Taliban.

The decision -- reached during a special closed-door session of the lower house on Tuesday -- received overwhelming backing from lawmakers, Mohammad Hasib Noori, a media official in the fledgling parliament told Reuters On Wednesday.

The U.S. military says the accident was caused by brake failure as the truck descended a hill. The driver of the truck is back at his base pending an investigation but is not in custody.

Both the Afghan police and U.S. troops opened fire after a furious crowd gathered around a convoy of which the runaway truck had been part. At least seven more people were killed in unrest after the accident.

Update: Bill Roggio of the Counterterrorism Blog is in Kabul reporting on the aftermath of the riots. In his report, he stated this interesting bit of information. It seems that the rioters were ripe for something to riot about:

I spoke to several aid workers, contractors and Afghanis about the violence, and their conclusion was the demonstrations were organized, and the traffic accident was merely a catalyst. While there is frustration with driving habits of Western contractors and the military (particularly with the aggressive driving of some security company employees), the subsequent violence was primarily directed at the Karzai administration The neighborhood was targeted because of its relatively light security and the high-profile institutions that are housed there. There is concern among the community about the current security situation in Afghanistan, particularly with the increase in violence in southeastern Iraq and the murder of eight aid workers...

...There have been questions about the performance of the police during the riots. Jawed Ludin, President Hamid Karzai's Chief of Staff, described the police's performance as "shameful" and stated "we have to strengthen our police." There have been reports that some police joined in the violence. But their performance was not a complete failure. Subduing a violent riot within eight hours is no small feat (see the past and current riots in France), particularly for a relatively new police and military. There has been no follow-on violence two days after the accident. And the American woman who escaped the riots in her neighborhood grudgingly gave credit to the police, which she is critical of for being heavy handed at times.

So why is the parliament focusing only on the US soldiers if there are questions surrounding the behavior of some of the Afghan police?

Note: I included a second paragraph from Roggio's piece.

Comments (11)

How long do you suppose it ... (Below threshold)
Lorie Byrd:

How long do you suppose it will be before John Murtha calls for us to cut and run from Afghanistan?

How long will it be before ... (Below threshold)

How long will it be before we are chased out of Iraq?


U.S. troops kill pregnant woman in Iraq
BAGHDAD, Iraq - U.S. forces killed two Iraqi women -- one of them about to give birth -- when the troops shot at a car that failed to stop at an observation post in a city north of Baghdad, Iraqi officials and relatives said Wednesday. Nabiha Nisaif Jassim, 35, was being raced to the maternity hospital in Samarra by her brother when the shooting occurred Tuesday.

The dirty bastards! may the... (Below threshold)

The dirty bastards! may their blood sucking sand fleas double in size.

My comment was not directed... (Below threshold)

My comment was not directed at Lees entry!

So my blood sucking sand fl... (Below threshold)

So my blood sucking sand fleas can stay normal sized?

No Lee they can disappear a... (Below threshold)

No Lee they can disappear altogether.haha

I don't think your premise ... (Below threshold)

I don't think your premise is a fair one. People get arrested long before investigations are completed, at least in the USA.

The more pertinant question is, do our armed forces fall under the jurisdiction of the Afghani govt? I hope they don't.

In a third-world or semi-fr... (Below threshold)

In a third-world or semi-friendly country where an active duty service member is stationed, you are trained not to stop at an accident and get back to base ASAP. Once the locals have you in their hands, it is difficult if not impossible to get you out. If you are DUI, for example, getting busted down to E-1 and discharged is better than several years in an Islamic jail after corporal punishment.

This accident is being described as a mechanical failure (not unheard of) and if it was a deuce and a half rolling at even a slow speed, it could do considerable damage, as described. As this was part of a large convoy, it attracted a lot of attention. The riot is sadly not surprising considering the current state of affairs. It's regrettable to say, but it is amazing more folks weren't hurt or killed in the riot.

The Parliament is doing what it is supposed to do - represent the people who are pissed off. Its done so in a way that allows some face saving, as their resolution isn't binding or enforceable. So I don't think its appropriate to belittle them (at least any more than we belittle our own elected officials). Would it be better for them to just tell their constituents to buzz off and leave the Americans alone (and then lose their credibility with the electorate)?

Same thing happens in Germa... (Below threshold)

Same thing happens in Germany, South Korea and Japan couple of times a year, usually with a small protest, sometimes even a small riot and with lots of calls for us to leave those countries.

Haven't seen the Murthas of the world calling for us to pull out of those countries. How much longer do we need to "win the peace" in Germany and Japan?

Answer to Parliment.<... (Below threshold)
USMC Pilot:

Answer to Parliment.

NO! But thanks for asking.

Who can blame them? They ar... (Below threshold)

Who can blame them? They are simply taking a que from U.S. Democrats.






Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile


Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links


Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login

Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy