« How The Democrats May Have Already Blown It | Main | The War Matters, Katie Couric Does Not »

Fencing with fools

Yesterday, the House passed a measure authorizing the construction of a 700-mile fence along our southern border. And, as expected, the Democrats opposed it. Their major criticisms:

1) It could push illegal aliens to make crossings in more dangerous areas.

2) It does nothing about protecting our northern border.

3) It's a modern-day "Berlin Wall."

Let's take these in turn:

1) A legal action might drive criminals into taking more chances to break our laws. By that logic, we ought to outlaw things like security fences, guards, and the like. They endanger criminals directly, and should not be tolerated, much like these fences.

2) Well, duh. But right now the southern border is the open sieve. If -- IF -- at some point in the future, the flow of illegal aliens increases from Canada, then we can look at doing something about it. But you don't skip fixing one imminent problem just because it doesn't address a potential one.

3) The Berlin Wall was intended to keep people IN. The American southern wall is intended to keep people OUT. If anyone wants out of the United States, they're pretty much free to go whenever they like, as long as they have someplace willing to take them. East Germany had an illegal EMIGRANT problem -- people wanted to get the hell out from under Communist oppression, and their slavemasters didn't want to let them go. So they went to extraordinary measures to get away, and the tyrants went to even more extreme measures to keep them. It's like the walls and fences and other barriers Israel is building. Only the most idiotic or partisan twits could possibly conflate the two types.

The real danger with this wall is that some will view it as the panacea for the illegal alien problem. It's a good first step, but it's only the first step. Another good one would be to make it easier for employers to verify the legality of job-seekers, and toughen the penalties for hiring illegals. But that ain't likely to happen any time soon.

Comments (3)

I was about to make a sarca... (Below threshold)

I was about to make a sarcastic comment relating illegal aliens to voter fraud, but I think I'll let that one slide.

Both issues get me fiery, and I'm too tired to rant.

1) It could push illegal al... (Below threshold)
USMC Pilot:

1) It could push illegal aliens to make crossings in more dangerous areas.

2) It does nothing about protecting our northern border.

3) It's a modern-day "Berlin Wall."

Everytime I think that some politician has said the absolutely stupidest thing posible, one of them proves me wrong.

McCain's statement about the posible future treatment of American prisoners of war was just about in the same vein.

Why does this resemble so m... (Below threshold)
Lurking Observer:

Why does this resemble so many other Democratic/liberal responses?

1. A wall could push illegal aliens to make crossings in more dangerous areas. Fighting our enemies only generates more of them. Whatever you do will only make things worse---therefore do as little as possible, certainly pro-actively.

2. A wall in the south doesn't do anything about the north. Fighting Saddam doesn't end bad regimes elsewhere. Why Mexico and not Canada? Why Iraq and not Sudan/North Korea/Syria? Why Muslims and not Christian fundamentalists?

3. A wall to keep people out is the equivalent of the "Berlin Wall." And Bush is the equivalent of Saddam (I believe McDermott said that), Hitler, Osama. America is no better than Iran (when it comes to owning nukes).

The same message, just with the proper nouns slightly altered. Over and over again.






Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile


Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links


Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login

Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy