« Mad Love | Main | Saddam verdict: Death by hanging »

The True Origins of Totalitarianism

Boy, a little bit of dictatorship sure sounds nice around now. As the midterm elections approach apace, we, the crack young staff of "The Hatemonger's Quarterly," are sufficiently irritated by the rigors of the campaign season that we're almost pining for an American monarchy.

Now, don't get us wrong, dear reader: We're not like so many of our left-wing (and, increasingly, right-wing) pals who dislike our country's desire to promote democracy worldwide. Further, we don't have a hankering for dictatorship due to some love affair with Bush's "imperial presidency," as some of our "progressive" pals might put it.

Frankly, dear reader, it's much simpler than that. The incessant chatter about political minutiae has officially driven us up a wall. The omnipresent partisan muckraking has irked us no end. The constant predictions from moronic talking heads have left us enraged.

We don't know about you, but we'd blithely vote for Charlie Rangel if doing so meant an end to the 24-7 coverage of the Virginia Senate race. Heck, we'd vote for Saddam Hussein if it'd get Ned Lamont to disappear.

And the television commercials? Oh, don't even talk to us about the television commercials.

Nothing's quite as depressing as taking in disingenuous ad after disingenuous ad with lines like: "My opponent supports the killing and eating of babies. She's just not right for New Mexico." Perhaps the only thing worse than these wretched bits of propaganda is all the hand-wringing about negative ads in the first place.

"Negative ads are so horrible, so despicable," say manifold television pundits and shifty party operatives. "They're nasty, they're disgraceful, and they turn people off of politics."

Naturally, this sort of sentiment is just meaningless claptrrap: Every political campaign claims to detest negative advertising, yet nearly every political campaign engages in it. It seems, however, that merely stating that you oppose these noxious ads gives you carte blanche to produce them.

Let us not forget, of course, the manifold accusations of polling irregularities, voter fraud, and the like--all of which, thanks to the Sore-Loserman crowd, have already appeared in advance of the actual voting. Although we're sure this must make life predictable and easy for the likes of Jesse Jackson (he can come up with great rhymes for "Republican theft" well before anyone heads to the polls), it makes it intolerable for us.

So, sure, we love democracy. The worst form of government, excepting all the others--blah, blah, blah. But, to be downright honest, a few more weeks of this wall-to-wall political detritus, and we'll be begging for some sort of a coup. Anything to put us out of our misery.

(Note: The crack young staff normally "weblog" over at "The Hatemonger's Quarterly," where they're happily ruminating on the three seconds of calm in between the 2006 midterm election and the 2008 presidential race.)


Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The True Origins of Totalitarianism:

» Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator linked with Bush hails verdict as milestone for Iraq

Comments (7)

Wait till Hillary runs. You... (Below threshold)
USMC Pilot:

Wait till Hillary runs. Your going to need to move to the moon.

Those three seconds of calm... (Below threshold)

Those three seconds of calm are like the fleeting three seconds between Labor Day Sales and Christmas advertising. Blink and you'll miss them.

I second the sentiment. Th... (Below threshold)

I second the sentiment. This is enough to make you pine for the stability of say, oh I don't know, the Saudi royal family, or maybe Musharraf's Pakistan.

Anyone who watch's TV ad's ... (Below threshold)

Anyone who watch's TV ad's is an idiot in the first place. I have no delusions of placing Aristocracy or Autocracy ahead of Democracy.....In fact all the ad's we're seeing are somewhat a result of Money politics over-riding Democracy.....I say make elections public. Any political donation over $100 dollars is taxed at 100% and funds public elections.

Stated another way the very ad's these guys hate are a result of them defending money in politics as a form of free speech. This is the very thing you defend and it doesn't have to be this way. We are the people...WE make the rules....

Jay, why do you invite thes... (Below threshold)

Jay, why do you invite these people to post articles on here? The content is rambling, and the writing style is juvenile. At least your articles have a point to them.

Well, since Jay Tea doesn't... (Below threshold)

Well, since Jay Tea doesn't own the blog, I'd say your asking a pointless question, Brian.

I rather enjoy the Hatemong... (Below threshold)

I rather enjoy the Hatemongers' pieces, Brian. Besides, as Silver pointed out, I don't own this blog -- Kevin does, and he invited them, not I. Their continued presence is not up to me.

And even if it was, I'd still welcome them.







Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile


Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links


Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login

Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy