« Charlie Rangel Is Still Blabbing About the Draft | Main | The voice of rage »

Flopping Aces Uncovers the Latest Case of Media Malpractice

Flopping Aces has an investigative piece that is pretty amazing -- not just because of the content, but how comprehensive it is. Curt at Flopping Aces has done an incredible job uncovering something the mainstream media should have caught. Read the entire, exhaustive report, but here is the overview. The story reported breathlessly by all major media outlets about multiple mosques being burned in Iraq, and several people being burned alive not only cannot be confirmed by U.S. officials, but the sole cited source of the information, Capt. Jamil Hussein, has a long history of being the sole source of information about atrocities being reported in Iraq. Read all of Curt's excellent report, including extensive updates, as well as See Dubya's analysis at JunkYardBlog.

Update: Just a few thoughts on this story...anytime I see a story like this, as with the Dan Rather "fake, but accurate" story, I wonder how many more stories out there that have been widely reported and swallowed without question, are suspect as well.

Since the "fauxtography" stories broke earlier this year, you would think that the media would go the extra mile to get multiple sources and extensive confirmation for stories like this.

The thing that really has me perplexed is why so many of the stories, as with the instances of "fauxtography," would be faked, or exaggerated, when there is so much bad news coming out of Iraq right now. Isn't the real news bad enough? Is now the time the opponents of the US mission in Iraq need to be exaggerating or manufacturing bad news? Maybe these propagandists could take a lesson from Dan Rather. Prior to the Rathergate story, many people already believed it likely that George Bush had pulled some strings to stay out of Vietnam. Mapes' and Rather's use of obviously fake documents was not only unethical and unprofessional, but it was also unnecessary. That is how stuff like this strikes me -- absolutely unnecessary. The situation in Iraq is violent. People get that. If the MSM keep running stories like this one without doing a bit more homework, their credibility will suffer as Rather's did. To a great extent it already has.

Update II: Most of the people I know personally, who are not news junkies and blog readers like I am, are unaware of the fauxtography story and other stories about instances when the media has been found to have been wrong. They heard about Dan Rather and the Bush National Guard story, but few are aware of the suspect reporting coming out of Iraq and the rest fo the Middle East. What is worse, though, is that even though I know about the suspect reports, I generally don't question the factual basis of the stories I hear from the Middle East unless someone else raises a question about the facts. I question the context, and the way stories are reported, but even knowing what I know, I don't often consider the possibility that the stories I am reading from the news wires, which then get picked up by all the major news outlets, might be dead wrong.

I guess it is time to change my way of thinking and to start questioning the source for all of these stories. It is a bit disconcerting to think about how many other stories might have been based on the word of one person who now appears likely to be a one man insurgent propaganda factory. How many others like him are feeding news to a media all too willing to swallow anything that fits their storyline?

Update III: I will post more reaction later when I have more time to round it up, but Bruce Kesler has a fine piece to start with.

Update IV: Michelle has an excellent post on this story. Read it all.

Update V:
Curt has opened a new thread for updates at Flopping Aces. He already has quite a bit of new info in it, too.

Jeff Goldstein has some great analysis:

From Curt at Flopping Aces comes the news many of us quietly expected: Centcom has confirmed that Capt. Jamil Hussein, the primary source for the recent kerosene mosque murder reports--and for a whole host of reports of Shia massacres recounted by the AP--is neither an employee of Iraq's Ministry of Interior nor is he a police captain.

In short, the AP has been relying on a bogus source for much of its reporting on Shia violence against Sunnis since at least April.

For those who continue to suggest that the mainstream press has a negligible impact on elections, consider that the majority of Americans who bothered to pay any attention whatsoever to this story will be left with an account of horrific sectarian violence against women and children--and the belief that sectarian strife in Iraq is not only inexorable and savage, but pandemic.

Underlying this reportage, then, is an unseemly subtext: that Arabs in Iraq--and perhaps even Arabs in general--are incapable of working toward a free society, one that, through a series of ratified political documents and elections, has merely pretended to be taking its first tentative steps toward the acceptance of a baby pluralism.

For those who missed it, Patterico uncovered more evidence of the media being used as a terrorist propaganda mouthpiece over the weekend. Read it all if you haven't and add it to the growing list of stories that get broadcast far and wide only to be found to be false later. Where is the big MSM story about how they got duped by a bunch of murderous thugs into misleading the American people? Funny isn't it? (Well, not funny, but you know what I mean.) Many of the "Bush lied" stories have now been shown to be true afterall. The "16 words" comes to mind first. But many of the MSM stories about violence in Iraq have now been shown to have been exaggerated or fabricated. Just start with the great Iraqi museum looting and work forward. As I said earlier in this post, there is plenty of violence and bad news coming from Iraq that it is not necessary to make stuff up. How the heck are they (the terrorist propagandists and the MSM) getting away with this stuff?

Bloggers are just recently catching on and exposing fake stories, but these exposes have not yet reached the people in the form of a story on a primetime network newscast. What the heck will it take to get some serious MSM attention to this problem? Will they wait until their credibility is on par with Rather and Mapes? It would appear that is the course they have chosen. Michelle Malkin sums it up perfectly: "Journalists in the legacy press are too busy trying to write the Bush administration's obituary to notice that they are writing their own...MSM credibility, R.I.P."

Update VI: The Anchoress says much of what I have been thinking, but when I think it, it doesn't sound nearly as good as she does here:

I wonder how many of our troops are being further endangered by the fakery we're discovering here? I wonder how many of their deaths in the coming weeks will be due to this sort of stuff?

As usual with stories like this the fake story - and the impressions it has made on the minds of the public - is out there, damage done. I don't see how alternate media can win against a major media that fabricates crap and puts it out there knowing that even if they correct the story a week later, they've done their damage. It's a sneakly lawyer's trick, actually - like putting an idea in a jury's head and then having the judge tell them to "disregard" it.

I frankly don't know how the president had endured this non-stop game, the incessant lying and leaking, distortion and hate-mongering in the press. I don't know how anyone can endure it and not lose heart. Perhaps he has. The press is literally trying to not simply destroy the man but take down his government and surrender a military action that is important to the survival of our identity, and the West's. And, sadly, they seem to be succeeding.

This cannot end well. The government needs to slap down the press and demand some accountability. They've needed to do it for a couple of years now. They won't.

She chose the perfect analogy in a lawyer that throws something out there knowing that a judge's instruction to disregard it is impossible. I can't go as far as the government enforcement yet, although in some instances a strong case could be made for it. I just hold a small sliver of hope that the truth will win out. It ain't gonna happen by accident though. It will happen when the American public demand accountability from their media. Unfortunately they have been too busy demanding entertainment value from it to pay much attention to the other stuff -- you know, like facts and such. So, it is up to the bloggers at this point. Okay bloggers, let's keep the heat on them. It looks like it's going to be a full time job.


Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Flopping Aces Uncovers the Latest Case of Media Malpractice:

» Michelle Malkin linked with The media fog of war

» Flopping Aces linked with Getting The News From The Enemy, Update

» Pierre Legrand's Pink Flamingo Bar linked with MSM not wrong, just on the otherside. pt 296 War Crimes edition.

» Right Wing News linked with Evidence Is Mounting -- More Fake News

» Flopping Aces linked with Getting The News From The Enemy, Update

Comments (10)

The dirty little secret of ... (Below threshold)
Robin Goodfellow:

The dirty little secret of the MSM is that this is the way the media has ALWAYS worked, for centuries. It is only now with modern communications technology that we're able to see through the BS on a regular basis.

A lie travels around the wo... (Below threshold)
DL From Heidelberg:

A lie travels around the world before the truth gets out of bed. Talk to anyone who has been to Iraq. They will tell you the first story out of the gate is the one that gets believed regardless of whether it true. In a culture (the West) that values facts and investigations as the means of establishing them, the bad guys (Jihadists, MSM) have the distinct advantage.

The most notable point in b... (Below threshold)

The most notable point in both articles is the fact no one knows whom this person is that is feeding the stories to the MSM. The military is even trying to track the guy down.

And then on top of that the MSM runs with stories that are unconfirmed by the U.S. Military. Even stories that the U.S. Military claims never happened, yet in spite of that they use the enemy propaganda instead of facts from our guys.

I hope the bloggers push this story hard for a week or two until it is forced to addressed by the MSM.

THe damage has been done,if... (Below threshold)

THe damage has been done,if GWB had brought charges against the NYT,then some of this may have stuck in the minds of the uninformed but as it is the impressions have been made.

Just look at the Credits on... (Below threshold)

Just look at the Credits on every story. If it is the ASSociated (with terrorists) Press or Roto Reuters there's a 99 44/100 % chance it's anything from a partial truth to a full blown lie, backed with photo shopped pictures.

They have became, or always were, a part of the destroy America by destroying President Bush left wing. Providing support for the enemy, any enemy, has been a habit of the antique MSM for years, long before President Bush came to town.

Anyone that hasn't seen the top leadership of the democratic party doing everything against the country (helping the enemies of the country, through words and deeds) and nothing for it the past six years is blind, deaf, and dum (not dumb). A wounded ego is a dangerous thing, especially in the weak minded dim's.

Why you cant trust the libe... (Below threshold)
spurwing plover:

Why you cant trust the liberal left-wing news media their payed liars

Enough has been said that t... (Below threshold)

Enough has been said that ties AP and Reuters to manufactured or embellished stories putting the U.S. in a poor light, especially the Bush administration. So, who is the AP, Reuters, what names can we demand some retractions and answers from? We need names and we need to hound their asses off. The people in charge, not just some corporate logo, need to be held accountable. They are hiding and we need to expose.

I am not really surprised b... (Below threshold)

I am not really surprised but saddened that the MSM has deliberately accepted questionable reports from possibly fake spokesmen to advance their agenda of hate of America and GWB. He imbedded them in the military to get the truth out. Obviously they can't see the truth when they are blinded by their rage and animosity toward the pres and all things military. I am increasingly discouraged and am ready to surrender in the war on jihadi extremism. I will keep myself prayed up to our Lord and Saviour and expect the worst.

Carol,Pick up the ... (Below threshold)


Pick up the book "Static", and read the first few chapters for more information on this.

A century ago Yellow Journa... (Below threshold)

A century ago Yellow Journalism meant Rupert Murdock - like jingoistic BS promulgating fear and war.

I recommend we turn the term around to describe the cowardly and unethical current state of the MSM promulgating fear of war.






Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile


Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links


Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login

Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy