« So much for "straight from the horse's..." | Main | Dhimmitude Marches on in Britain »

The Iranian Plan

It's fun but foolish to stereotype one's enemies. It leaves you open to missing a critical perspective, or worse it can lead you into bad mistakes. While it is comforting to believe that the men running Iran have blundered into a minefield of bad options, in actual fact they have a strong hand in some ways, and we would be well advised to consider their intentions on different levels.

Mahmoud Ahmedinijad has often been colored as a puppet of the mullahs, and a zealous fanatic bent on bring about the end of the world in hopes of producing the "Hidden Imam". While there is some substance to this charge, it is not completely true, and fails to credit Mr. Ahmedinijad's intelligence. The reason this mistake is important, is because Adolf Hitler was similarly underestimated during the 1930s. This does not mean that Iran will be able to start a World War the way the Nazis did, but long before Ahmedinijad, or even before the mullahs came to power, Iran has been hungry for power.

The Soviets looked at their maps, and they noticed that Iran was a logical juncture for controlling the whole Mid-East. During World War 2, both the allies and the axis powers wanted to control Iran, because having it would deny control of the Middle East to the other side. Ever wonder why one of the mid-war summits was held in Teheran?

During the late 1960s and early 1970s, the Shah and his generals took eager note of Western withdrawal from Southwest, then Southeast Asia. They accordingly ramped up demands not only from the West, but from their neighbors. The oil revenues were enticing enough, but centuries-old disputes were also revived. The bloody wahhabist thirst for Jihad and sectarian feuds was also born in the cowardice of diplomats trained at Eton but not Sandhurst, and the type who thought Foggy Bottom a proper training ground rather than Quantico.


This plan is long in its planning, and truly Iranian in its origin. Had the Shah held on to power in 1978, one of his sons would be behind the plan now. That is the bad news, but also the good. What is popular in Iran is not often a winner everywhere else, no matter how the conjured street protests appear. Iran is hoping to challenge American resolve, the one great weakness in our power. To do that, the Jihadists (led by Iran) have worked to strip away our allies. England is our greatest and oldest ally (France does not count, having abandoned their friendship long ago), and so separating the UK from the US is seen as a crucial blow to the Eagle. Not least because the whole world would see it.

Iran is long acquainted with long-term strategy. The Persian Empire ruled the region until Alexander shattered it, and that classic game of strategy, Chess, is generally accepted to have been created in Persia; 'Checkmate' is the English translation of the Persian phrase "Shah Mat", signaling not only the end of the game but regime change in general. Even during the Ottoman Empire, the various potentates in Iran fancied themselves kingmakers and men of significant influence. It surprises no one to understand that Iran uses Oil as a weapon (although those foolish mannequins who protest a fictional Western 'War for Oil' never seem to notice this fact), but the greater strategy in which supply and price manipulation are used is not often considered. During the years when OPEC was coming into its power, Iran directly made, then broke, dozens of commitments and agreements, with an eye to deliberately destabilizing the oil market. Some observant individuals have noted that the present crisis has already benefited Iran by raising the price of oil simply by creating instability; it must be understood that this condition was not spontaneous, but planned.

The humiliation of hostages by Iran is another traditional tactic, a favorite in no small measure because there never seems to be an effective resistance to it. The media is only too happy to air video which has been crafted and produced to the precise intentions of propagandists, without a moment's consideration about whether a company based in the United States should so act against her interests and safety. For here, it is salient to understand that Iran knows enough about media to play it to its advantage, an effective and common use of unconventional and asymmetrical warfare.

I should be careful to avoid drifting off into discussions of tactics, where the strategy is so important for our focus. It is enough for here to understand that Iran has carefully considered that it must avoid direct confrontation against our main military force, and so it does as it has for the past three decades, seeking incremental gains through asymmetrical attacks against targets of opportunity. Through such actions, Iran hopes to gradually gain the upper hand and approach a 'tipping point' beyond which it would be ruinous for the United States to initiate overt hostilities, and futile to ask our erstwhile allies to join the effort. The cultivation of timidity in Western diplomats and the continued threat of economic impact have borne fruit for Iran, and may be expected to continue in that manner.

When Iran reaches that tipping point, its modernized and expanded military will then be able to pursue its regional goals, which I expect will manifest initially by consolidation of controlling the Wahabbist effort. Therefore, seizure of Mecca and Medina under the pretext of protecting those cities from the West will be the most visible signs, although the replacement of OPEC by a Teheran-based entity is also likely. Promises to respect the remaining territory in Saudi Arabia, accompanied by veiled threats of military responses to any action from the West, and economic punishment for any nation(s) which refuse to sign on to the conquest, will be sufficient to fuel the next stage. The intention is not outright invasion, but control through economic and religious influence, of the Middle East. At some point a symbolic military strike against Israel may also be expected, though that will wait for a clearly deficient Western leader in the mold of Carter, along with a pretext and indecision by Israel. The chief plan for now in those lines is highlighted by the Muslim special interest effort in Congress to drastically reduce support for Israel, especially military aid.

Street protests, already carefully manufactured by political wings of terrorist groups, will become even more common in Europe and the East and West coasts of the United States. Savvy Wahhabists are learning to play up alleged 'Civil Rights' abuses against Islamists, with an eye to blurring the distinction between honest Muslims who assimilate into American communities and those who actively disrupt the government and legitimate American interests and security concerns. Financial warfare may also be expected in the future, with web transactions a weak-link target of online attacks, and web fraud an easy and effective means to disrupt the U.S. economy, which in turn would disrupt the European and Asian economies. Conversely, the Nikkei and Shanghai bourses have shown an alarming susceptibility to manipulation, especially when the aggressor wants to create volatility, and a crash in Asia would be certain to affect the rest of the world as well. This avenue of attack must be anticipated and defenses prepared.

The kidnapping and mistreatment of the fifteen British sailors is an outrage, but it is the butter-willed response from London which bears the worse omen for the future.


Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Iranian Plan:

» The Crimson Blog linked with Iran - Nuclear in 2009

» The Thunder Run linked with Web Reconnaissance for 04/03/2007

Comments (11)

Ok, so if the long term str... (Below threshold)

Ok, so if the long term strategy plays out as such, shouldn't something STRONG be done NOW to keep that SCALE from slowly tipping?

If the analogy of chess is used, WE/West need to go on offense and stop reacting to Iranian strategy.

To me, if world economy is going to be in jeopardy with future Iran issues be it nuclear or regional oil control, I say ravage that country NOW, NO troops..just flatten them.

Let the world cry we are mean and bad...who's gonna cry if they are allowed to destroy the region and The West?

Think it through, KB. What... (Below threshold)
DJ Drummond:

Think it through, KB. What would be the response if we, without discretion, ahem, "flattened them"?

There are only three ways to do so "without troops" as you desire. All of them would be impeachable acts, would cost us every ally we have left, and still leave China and other threats unaddressed.

Force is an option, and I agree we should act forcefully. Lashing out, however, is foolhardy and frankly would hurt us more than you imagine.

While I agree with the over... (Below threshold)
Brian The Adequate:

While I agree with the overall premise that Iran is playing a strategic power game, the tipping point will not be a co-opting of the Wahabbist movement.

Wahabbi is religiously a Sunni and ethnically Arab led movement, Iran is a Shite land ethnically Persian and anti-Arab.

To state that Iran will coopt the Wahabbi movement is analogous to thinking that the KKK could coopt the NAACP.

The tipping point IMHO comes when the Mullahs sucessfully test a nuke or two. Hopefully not using Tel Aviv as the test site.

DJ- I understand t... (Below threshold)


I understand that consequences of extreme force would be BAD.
My point is if the consequences are going to be BAD in the (long) term if WE/West don't do something, then why not DO something meaningful now.

Meaningful-- as in besides (talking) and looking useless like the U.N.
I think it's better to survive and lose allies, then to be destroyed and keep allies.

B. the A. -- beat me to it ... (Below threshold)

B. the A. -- beat me to it w.r.t. the "Wahabbi cooption"... I have a long way to go before I feel I have a good understanding of the machinations underlying the Arab and Persian parts of the equation, but it would seem (from my very limited perspective) a far from likely and incredible feat were they to accomplish such a thing.

DJ D. -- Thanks -- much to mull over.

Iran is in deep crap for a ... (Below threshold)

Iran is in deep crap for a number of reasons and Ahmed needed something to distract the malcontents from his oppressive reforms.

A red herring.

This fits the bill beautifully.

You haven't read anything about internal strife in Iran in two weeks, have you?

I take issue with most of t... (Below threshold)
dr lava:

I take issue with most of this post. Scott Ritter, who has spent a lot of time in Iran lately, and who was 100% correct on this entire Iraq debacle, has written a very informative book on the subject that clears up a lot of the malarky in the original post. "Target Iran" is the most up to date take on what is happening inside the country. Ritter paints a pretty grim picture of a Bush managed conflict with Iran and the missed opportunities to solve the problems we may or may not face.

The Iranian peoples support for the current government is at about 30%...about what Bushs is. Bush knows how to boost that to 90% and he is ignorant enough to try it.

You lost my vote when you c... (Below threshold)
DJ Drummond:

You lost my vote when you chose Ritter for your authority.

Ritter told the Senate unde... (Below threshold)

Ritter told the Senate under oath that Saddam was six months away from being able to make a nuclear bomb. That was shortly after UNSCOM inspectors, for whom Ritter supplied security, were withdrawn prior to Clinton's 1998 strikes against Iraq.

Trying to make a date with a 14 year old on the internet doesn't enhance his credibility, either. His view of Iraq changed right about the time he received a $500,000 contract from a pro-Saddam Iraqi-American businessman to make a "documentary" on Iraq (despite his lack of film making experience).

However, the radical Islamism which infects the Mad Mullahs is not Wahhabism, which is a fringe Sunni sect. The Iranian regime is composed of radical Shi'ites. While they embrace terrorism and hate the West and moderate Muslims with equal fervor, and have been cooperating in many areas in the last decade or so, they are of completely different theologies.

dr lava, you give away that... (Below threshold)

dr lava, you give away that you erupt by some firey swamp. Ritter was wrong because he was corrupt. What is your problem?

DJ, why bother to learn to ... (Below threshold)

DJ, why bother to learn to manipulate the web when flying a plane into a skyscraper puts a trillion dollar hit on the economy? I maintain that without the artificial influence of 'found' wealth, these societies, in denial of the liberating and strengthening principles of the enlightenment, would not stand a chance against free people. I'm not so pessimistic as you; both Wahabbi and radical Shia are doomed.

That doesn't mean they won't go without a fight. Their armor, though, is not Allah, it's Oilah.






Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile


Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links


Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login

Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy