« W(h)ither Democracy? | Main | Could Nancy Pelosi have been right? »

If this is a "truce," gimme war

Every now and then, I find myself thinking that certain people who decry an anti-Israel bias in the media are just being a little hysterical and whiny and paranoid. But just when I'm about to really believe it, I stumble across some evidence that they just might be dead right.

This morning's Boston Globe carries a story from a Los Angeles Times reporter titled "Palestinians say attack broke cease-fire." And the author, Richard Boudreaux, doesn't even try very hard to hide it.

But reporters don't always get to write their headlines. It's the story that counts. So, what's his lead? "An Israeli helicopter attack in the Gaza Strip yesterday that killed a member of a militant squad was one of the most serious breaches yet of the four-month-old cease-fire, Palestinian officials said."

You know, I'm going to pull the lazy thing here. I'll just quote the whole story.

GAZA CITY -- An Israeli helicopter attack in the Gaza Strip yesterday that killed a member of a militant squad was one of the most serious breaches yet of the four-month-old cease-fire, Palestinian officials said.

The Israeli military said the air attack was aimed at militants planting a bomb along the border fence and did not amount to a cease-fire violation.

Israel denied sending ground forces into the coastal territory. But Palestinian officials who monitor the border said fighting erupted before dawn when plainclothes Israeli special forces slipped past the fence and were discovered by a squad of fighters from two small militant groups that refuse to honor the Nov. 26 truce. (1)

The helicopter attack was apparently aimed at covering the retreat of the special forces. In the last two weeks, Israel has staged an airstrike and a brief ground incursion against Palestinian gunmen, killing one in each operation.(2)

Palestinian witnesses who described yesterday's 90-minute battle said the Israeli helicopter fired at least four missiles between the border fence and the Jabaliya refugee camp in northern Gaza Strip, wounding three Palestinians.

One of them, Fuad Maruf, 22, of the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine, was killed.

That group and Islamic Jihad said they had been firing rocket-propelled grenades and automatic weapons at the Israeli special forces and setting off explosives along the fence (3).

Israeli officials say militant groups in Gaza, including Hamas, which shares power in the Palestinian Authority government, have been exploiting the cease-fire to smuggle explosives, missiles, and other weapons into Gaza through tunnels from Egypt.

During the truce, Palestinians have continued to fire crude Kassam rockets into Israel, although at a slower rate.(4)

Israel withdrew its military bases and settlers from Gaza in September 2005. After militants seized an Israeli soldier from his post along the Gaza border, Israeli troops frequently reentered the territory.(5)

1) "Two small militant groups that refuse to honor the Nov. 26 truce." Sounds to me like that the Palestinians aren't that interested in the truce, if they're willing to tolerate these groups violating it from their territory, in their names, on a regular basis.

2) "Gunmen" doesn't mean "guys with guns." It means "guys with guns shooting at Israelis." Palestinians shooting at Israelis doesn't violate a truce; Israelis shooting back does. Remember this principle.

3) Note that the DFLP and IJ are using military-grade weapons, and the Palestinian Authority has no problems with that. The Palestinian Authority unilaterally declared the "truce," but doesn't bother to even make a token gesture at enforcing it.

4) Here's another interesting definition of "truce" -- "you stop fighting, we'll cut back a little."

5) Note the slurring of facts here. Gilad Shalit was "seized," not "captured" or "kidnapped." That several of his comrades were killed in the same raid is not mentioned. And that Israeli troops might have "frequently reentered the territory" is couched as a tit-for-tat move, a retaliation, and not presented as possible rescue operations -- because the Palestinians don't have a great record of hospitality for Israeli soldiers.

Well done, Mr. Boudreaux.

Comments (5)

Arafat got away with this c... (Below threshold)
Robert the original:

Arafat got away with this crap for decades: "It was that military wing of the PLO, we can't do a thing with them, no control."

The IRA did the same thing for years.

The Junjaweed is doing it now in Darfur.

And the media & libs buy it every time: "Arafat? Oh him, that man of peace. What a good guy, too bad he has no control over those militant terrorist splinter groups. Let's invite him back to the White House and give him some money. Gerry Adams? What a man of peace - send him some money - he's got nothing to do with Sinn Fein."

Probably the most twisted event in recent history was the Nobel for Arafat.

The continued launching of ... (Below threshold)

The continued launching of the missiles means one of two things; either the leadership condones it or hey have no control of those who are doing it.

Neither is acceptable.

Israel, just the US, doesn't understand that you need to get the ass's attention. You find someone of someTHING that they really value highly and you kill it.

Then you do it again.

And again.

Until they release your guy.

It just grates me that each time this happens- each time there is a transgression- the media is focused on how "properly" must be the response of Israel (or recently, Britain) and the plight of those committing the crimes is fully explored to generate the greatest sympathies against the big bad Democracies.

How many "Palestinians" doe... (Below threshold)

How many "Palestinians" does it take to equal one IDF soldier? At least 1400

Maybe more ...

Information Minister Mustafa Barghouti did not say how many prisoners are on the list. In the past, Hamas-allied militants demanded the release of 1,400 prisoners held by Israel in exchange for freeing Israeli Cpl. Gilad Shalit, abducted 10 months ago. In all, Israel holds some 9,300 Palestinians.

Fact of the matter is, the "Palestinians" are not interested in peace.

I teach a college class in ... (Below threshold)

I teach a college class in Information Literacy. Among the things I like to do is collect examples of media bias like this to use as a clue-bat.

Thanks for yet another example.

how more Palestinians???How... (Below threshold)

how more Palestinians???How much more??????????






Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile


Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links


Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login

Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy