« Who Owns Your Favorite Candidate's Name? | Main | #$#%^$ Taxes! »

Earmarks Database

The Examiner has some good information about a very useful resource.

In a city that lives on rhetorical excess, it's often easy to dismiss grandiose claims by senior federal officials. Not so with this statement last week by U.S. Office of Management and Budget Director Rob Portman: "This database houses more information on earmarks in one place than has ever been publicly available through the federal government." He was referring to the updated version of the Earmarks Database posted April 4 in the OMB section of the White House Web site.

The OMB Earmarks Database offers details on 13,496 earmarks totaling more than $19 billion that were contained in fiscal year 2005 appropriations. OMB staffers have been working for months with officials elsewhere in the executive branch to dig out and verify details of earmarks that "circumvent the merit-based or competitive allocation process." OMB estimates that the number of such earmarks has tripled in the past decade. Virtually all of that increase occurred under Republican majorities in Congress.

A vital precedent has been established by the mere fact the White House has made available such a wealth of data about earmarks in a manner that enables millions of taxpayers to examine it and reach their own conclusions about the propriety of the spending. Public opinion is likely to generate mounting pressure in future years to put more such information on the Internet, especially as citizens groups, nonprofit activists, journalists and bloggers dig into the data and find evidence of wrong-doing, conflicts of interest and corruption. They may also discover programs in which federal spending is inadequate or poorly targeted as a result of distortions created by earmarks.

That is the good news about the database. Follow the link to read about its major flaw.

Comments (1)

Oh, great. You can't use th... (Below threshold)

Oh, great. You can't use this database to determine who proposed the earmark and the listed recipient of the earmark may in fact not be the people that get it eventually.

What a waste of time & money.






Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile


Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links


Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login

Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy